Episode 171 - Marks on the Markets: Data, History, and Insight with Matt Monson
Subscribe to the Podcast:
In this episode of Marks on the Markets, Richard Cunningham and John Coleman interview Matt Monson, a public equities investor from Sovereign Capital.
The three of them discuss various topics related to the markets, including the performance of large cap stocks compared to small cap stocks, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on businesses, the current state of interest rates, and the implications of international conflicts on the markets.
They also touch on the importance of corporate engagement and proxy voting for faith-driven investors. The conversation concludes with personal reflections on the significance of Passover and the lessons learned from Scripture.
All opinions expressed on this podcast, including the team and guests, are solely their opinions. Host and guests may maintain positions in the companies and securities discussed. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as specific investment advice for any individual or organization.
Episode Transcript
Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it.
Rusty Rueff: Hey everyone! All opinions expressed on this podcast, including the team and guests, are solely their opinions. Host and guests may maintain positions in the companies and securities discussed, and this podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as specific investment advice for any individual or organization. Thanks for listening.
Richard Cunningham: Well welcome everybody and hello. And it's episode 171 of the Faith Driven Investor podcast. We are grateful you're here. My name is Richard Cunningham. You find this recording this at the end of April 2024. John Coleman, as always, one of our mainstays is here in the studio with us from Atlanta, Georgia. And John, we've got a great one today is it's a marks on the markets episode. And one of our guests is someone we admire greatly. A Denver, Colorado native, Matt Monson. Someone you get to work pretty closely with. Matt, we are so overjoyed to have you in the podcast studio.
Matt Monson: Yeah, thanks for having me.
John Coleman: Oh, man, it's so great. We haven't had Matt on since 2022, I think was what we said. And look, I just have a ton of respect for this guy. I've gotten to work for him, with him for the last three years and just towering intellect in the public equity markets in particular, Matt, and always well prepared. So I can't wait to hear your thoughts on what's happening right now.
Richard Cunningham: Oh man, I'm equally excited. Let's see that intellect on full display today here on this marks on the markets episode. And so without further ado gents, let's dive in. Equity markets have just made a monumental run. We saw last week a pretty tough week in terms of drawbacks for the equity markets, specifically The Magnificent Seven. But Matt, maybe how did we end up here? How has there been such a soft landing? Is there still upside in these markets. And just kind of orient our listeners as to where we are currently?
Matt Monson: Yeah, that's a good question. You know, I would say the greatest opportunity for sure is in small and mid-caps and then some select large caps. So remember that seven stocks are driving a lot of the move in the stock market today. So the other 793 stocks in the S&P 500 are not actually all that expensive. So many people know that when they buy the S&P 500, that 34% of their dollars are actually just going into ten companies. Many of those companies were up 50 to 200% last year in 2023. And they're up significantly again in 2024. So this type of concentration is in these top ten companies is actually the same across many different large cap indexes. So one of my thoughts is just that, you know the labor market here has been surprisingly strong, especially after these monumental rate hikes have taken place. I mean, this was the third largest set of rate hikes in the last ten tightening cycles ever since the 50s. And it could have broken the economy, but it didn't. And one of my thoughts just share on why that might be is you see it in the surveys. The Small Business Survey for NFIB shows that 40% of small businesses weren't able to fill the seats that they had open. So even if that tightening reduced demand and someone lost a job along the way, there were so many unfilled jobs just waiting for them that we didn't end up seeing it result in unemployment rates ticking up.
John Coleman: Hey Matt, I want to dig into this soft landing topic. But before we do, can we pause on this magnificent seven kind of top ten topic for a moment? Because I've been trying to think this through, because it's been a historic run for the last couple of years with those seven stocks in particular, particularly things like Nvidia, Apple, Amazon, Tesla, it's obviously pulled back quite a lot of those Magnificent seven. And I've been trying to understand, you know, how much of this is momentum, how much of this is a flight to quality in those stocks. Because whatever we'd say about them, you know, they are seven of the most successful companies in the world in terms of growth, in terms of profitability. So it doesn't look like the.com era where there's this completely inexplicable rise in certain stocks. I mean, these I get why people want to invest in Alphabet or Meta or Amazon or Apple, because the structural growth in those companies and financial stability, those companies actually has been very positive over the last several years. So help me think through just how to read those Magnificent Seven, because I keep thinking there will be a reversion to the mean, and that small caps will catch up to those large caps. Or frankly, 99% of the market will catch up to that 1% of the market. And yet that 1% continues to kind of outpace. So how do you think about the success of those seven stocks, and how much of that is legitimate and sustainable versus how much of that is kind of momentum driven?
Matt Monson: Yeah, I think if you unpack the business models for the seven, they all end up with one common theme in place. They have a technology based monopoly, and we can walk through each one one by one. But for the most part, the business models are really good and they don't have a lot of competition. And so when we look at companies that have done. Really well over time. Limited competition was always a key factor. And so I don't think when we looked at them last in, you know, call it months ago, I don't think the valuations look incredibly stretched even across the Magnificent Seven. And so you're seeing a lot of the stock price performance being driven by earnings growth and a combination of earnings growth and valuation expansion. But you know that multiple expansion isn't the standalone reason for stock price performance on those seven.
John Coleman: Yeah that's my read is they're actually fundamentally healthy stocks. They may be overvalued relative to some of the competition. But what I wouldn't expect from them, given what we're discussing is a dramatic pullback or it doesn't feel like the same type of bubble atmosphere that you would have gotten during the.com era, right? So you may see a drawback, but my impression is that's on the order of kind of a ten, 20, 30% reversion to small caps in mid-caps or other large caps rather than, you know, some sort of dramatic, collapse in those securities.
Matt Monson: Yeah, that's why I see it. And, you know, there's another theme there, too, is that AI is driving a lot of the growth that we're seeing in The Magnificent Seven. And, you know, we all maybe have a different view on what I could be, but if it's going to be the next penicillin and an airplane and the internet, then you've got something much bigger on your hands. It's, you know, at best in the beginning of the first inning here for AI. And so if that's the case, it's going to be market size expansion. I mean, it's really an arms race, right? Because you have so many different CEOs right now that will get fired if they don't invest in and explore AI. And I'm not talking about the people who are selling it to the rest of us. I'm talking every business is looking into it, and we don't even know what the financial ROI is going to be from that yet. But no one's going to be penalized for overspending. People are only going to be penalized for not diving in headfirst at this point.
John Coleman: You know, in the last craze in technology like this that I remember was blockchain, obviously, because cryptocurrencies were linked to that. And there was this distributed ledger technology that was for use in other things. And there was a period of time, maybe 5 or 6 years ago, where everybody was like putting blockchain in their latest earnings release, and they were getting huge bumps for that. If they talked about it. To me, the AI thing seems a lot more legitimate. You know, we had a pullback in that blockchain craze a few years ago. The difference here is that blockchain really required fundamental shifts in the infrastructure of business. And it was almost like the fax machine. A lot of use cases for it required every single counterparty to get on the same blockchain so that they could operate together. AI is interesting because the computing power is obviously much greater than with something like blockchain, which is one of the bottlenecks right now. But it doesn't require all the counterparties to operate. And we're seeing tons of interesting use cases come up for that, whether that's diagnosis in health care, whether it's cybersecurity applications where you've got artificial intelligence, you know, enabling those, you know, just this host of use cases that are springing out of these large language models. And my biggest question is whether those, you know, can continue on pace and whether we can move past the large language models, indeed, to something more like artificial general intelligence, which is, you know, and people stand in different areas. Obviously, Sam Altman is very optimistic about the continued progress of those. I recently saw a podcast, I think it was with Mark Zuckerberg, who was much more skeptical about the near-term movement into AGI. So I'm with you. I think the AI thing is quite interesting, and figuring out how it fits into the way that companies do business is a big part of how they're likely to succeed financially moving forward.
Richard Cunningham: Well, you guys can already tell we're off to a fast start. Matt Monson is on full display, and what a joy it is to kind of listen to you guys riff on this. You know, Matt, let's back up for a second just to kind of remind everyone. So you are a public equities investor. You run a couple of really neat funds at Sovereign Capital, the Omega Fund and an ETF that maybe you can tell us more about later on. And you're kind of distinct approach. But as we look at this disconnect between the run up of large cap stocks compared to small cap stocks, you guys have gotten into the AI conversation already. You know, how are you maybe responding to this as you kind of evaluate markets in your role specifically?
Matt Monson: Yeah, that's a great question. So we actually just ran a bunch of data last week. So I've got a fresh off the top of my mind. You know, we're all cap investors, which means that we are one third large cap, one third mid one third small caps. And so we don't have a bias towards talking up anything specifically. And we can kind of move between them. But what I'll bring to the conversation is that large caps right now are trading at a 33% premium to their 18 year pre-COVID forward earnings multiple. And so right now they're trading at 20.7 times forward earnings. Small caps, however, are trading at a 20% discount to their historical multiple. And they're only trading at 15 times forward earnings, say small caps, for reference, have typically traded at a small premium to where the large caps have traded. But right now, at a 25% discount, it's a historically wide discount. And so let me remind folks of a few different things from 2000 to 2016. Small caps were up 410%. Mid-caps were up 370%, both of which significantly outperform large caps, which only rose 112% during that time period from 2000 to 2016. And then the tables turned so 2017 through present. Large caps are up 152% versus small up only 67 and mid up 92. So the recency bias inherent in all of us over the last seven years has shown that large caps have won. So I run into clients all the time who only want to own large caps, and they're forgetting about that 16 year stretch before that, that small caps and mid-caps absolutely dramatically outperformed large caps. So I just find that to be interesting. And so we love being in the all cap space because we're able to access all of them, not knowing when and to what degree one cap will turn and will be the leader for the next 16 years.
Richard Cunningham: Wow, that's some good data. I worked for a premium investor that sought out specifically small cap and value premiums for a number of years prior to move it over to faith driven investor. And it was in the midst of that, you know, kind of unprecedented large cap outperformance and growth, outperformance of small in value. And so it was a tough couple of years for the firm, to say the least. But there is so much reference back to the historical basis for small cap and everything like that. So gentlemen, any closing comments. Kind of as we look at the public equities market and everything, as before, we get into kind of the interest rate conversation and go that way.
John Coleman: Well, I would say my overall comment and perhaps Matt hasn't been surprised, but he just listed those numbers. You know, 2001 I think was through 2016 and then 2016 to present. And what continues to surprise me is just the incredible momentum and resiliency of US equity markets. I would have expected a dramatic slowdown in the current environment. I would have expected much more fear in the equity markets because of all the instability, inflation, etc. and yet US equities have just proven remarkably resilient in this environment. You know, that's one of the things I continue to be curious about, because it several times over the last 3 or 4 years, I would have guessed that we were in for a prolonged pull down in markets because of Covid, which came back very quickly because of the fear of recession, because of rising interest rates and inflation. And yet US equities have continued to plow forward. And so I'm cautiously optimistic that they'll continue to improve because of the fundamentals in the economy. And I know we're going to get to some of those here in a moment. Matt mentioned those, but it's been such a curiosity to me that they have been so resilient and we've had such a soft landing, despite all the moves of the last couple of years.
Richard Cunningham: Good comments, John. So maybe let's do this before interest rates. I think this is key to go into as well. Matt, any thoughts on maybe how what you're seeing play out in the public equities markets, how it's affecting things in the venture and PE space, and then also kind of that big question of, you know, what is it going to take to open IPO markets back up now that equities kind of have improved stabilized. Yes there's been the pullbacks. But let's go venture in PE markets maybe IPO markets. Prior to us commenting on just the interest rate environment and things like inflation.
Matt Monson: Yeah that's a wonderful question. I would say it depends. You know for some private equity and venture capital shops they own large cap names. And if you own large cap names that are now looking at comps in the marketplace that are trading north of 20 times earnings, you know, now you're going to see elevated mark to markets in your funds. Fund performance is going to go up. Your opportunity to exit into the public markets, whether to a strategic or in an IPO will be a lot better. Now the other side of that coin is if you are a venture fund or a private equity fund that owns a smaller mid-cap, you're not seeing those elevated valuation multiples. As I mentioned before, you know, you've got small cap forward earnings multiples at 15 times, which isn't going to create the kind of juicy backdrop that you're going to see in the large cap markets right now with regards to IPOs. You know, I think there's a lot of talk right now that, hey, you know, the IPO market slow. What's going on. You know I was looking at the historical data on it. And actually 200 IPOs a year is a fairly average number. And right now we're running just below that. So back to the recency bias in 2020. You saw a record number of IPOs in the US for 80. And then in 2021 a record above and beyond that at 1035. There are no other years like that. In the last 20 years the average is really around 200. And so I think we've got a pretty healthy IPO market right now.
John Coleman: That is fascinating, Matt. I would not have guessed that that is recency bias. And I guess we all forget. We been in the markets for like 20 years. But it's so easy to forget the. Prior eras. And Richard, what I would say I'm seeing in the private markets is fundraising is still a little bit slow in private markets, because people are still not getting distributions from their old private equity and venture holdings. I think selling positions has slowed a little bit. I do think the IPO markets, even if they're more back in an historical average that represents such a slowdown from the prior era, from the prior several years, that you haven't seen the liquidity mechanisms for some of these venture backed and private equity backed companies at the pace you would have seen them before, which slows down distributions. My perception is that the venture markets have bounced back in terms of valuations quite rapidly. You know, there was a dramatic pullback in venture valuations, which seems to be heating back up again, not at the 2021 levels, but we're seeing pretty aggressive valuations in the early stage. Venture markets and growth equity markets again whereas private equity has stayed somewhat deliberate. And I think part of that is because of the high interest rates, which we'll get into, you know, the private equity model, the LBO model is predicated on debt financing for many firms. And I think the inability to access cheap debt has kept valuations in those markets a bit more tame and has made them a little bit slower to inflate. That's my perception right now. And so the private equity valuation market has come back but a bit more slowly. And I think that will only continue to increase as some of these IPOs do you pick up I mean Matt said we're slightly below the historical average. You know, you'd like to see some liquidations, either sales in the private markets or IPOs of these private equity backed companies, or if interest rates start to come down, which I think would ignite, you know, the debt markets for IPOs in a pretty significant way.
Richard Cunningham: Right on. Well let's get right into that. So interest rates what do we think in gentlemen 2024 2025. There's been you know, maybe some tempering of expectations on what was supposed to be a rate cut heavy year by the fed. Matt, any thoughts on your end?
Matt Monson: Yeah. I mean, if we zoom out for just one moment, inflation has been a little stickier than people expected it to be. You know, running just a little north of 3%, depending on what data you want to look at. And because of that, the expectations for rate cuts have come down. You know, maybe it was going to be a handful earlier and now it's going to be still there's expectations for a little bit that may happen in the second half of the year. And as those expectations change it causes interest rate volatility. As there's interest rate volatility it impacts cyclicals. It impacts financials. It impacts small caps. And so it really ripples through. You know I think a lot of this is just on the heels of the labor market strength that we were talking about earlier. You have so many small businesses that have open racks that they can't fill and order magnitude. And that's around 40% right now. And so even with rising rates that have crushed some of the consumer demand, you still aren't seeing those job losses and an increase in in the unemployment rate the way that you maybe would have expected. And so just a remarkably strong labor market, I think, is really underpinning what we're seeing in terms of the overall economic strength, which has led to, you know, that persistent inflation around, a little north of 3%.
John Coleman: You know, and to Matt's point, I think inflation is almost always stickier than people think it will be. Right? I feel like historically, almost every time you think you've beaten inflation, it lingers a little bit longer than you think. And I do think there are still inflationary pressures on the economy, particularly the fiscal side of spending. You know, the United States government continues to pump liquidity into the economy, whether that's student loan debt relief, etc.. The second observation I would make, though, because Matt has mentioned several times the historical ratios and how recency bias is throwing us off. I would say we're suffering from a lot of recency bias around interest rates and inflation and employment as well. I had the privilege to one of my friends is now the president of the Ronald Reagan Foundation out on the West Coast, and I was touring the Reagan Library with him recently, and I saw some stats where they were trumpeting Ronald Reagan's presidency, 1981 to 1989. And I'm not getting into the politics of this, but just listen to these stats. They were saying how impressive it was that during Reagan's eight years, inflation fell from 12.4% to 4.6%, right, which is a little north of where we are today. I think unemployment fell from 7.4% to 5.2%, which is north of where we are today. And Matt, I remember when 5% was basically considered structural unemployment, right? The federal income tax rate, the top taxpayer rate was cut from 50% to 28%. So taxes were much higher. And the mortgage interest rate in the 80s dropped from 15.4% to 10.3%. And so if you actually look at the economic numbers today. The real aberration was the great financial crisis. Until two years ago, it was historic, global, low and negative interest rates, which drove just insane numbers around the economies of the world. And now we're at a point that's more like the historical averages with inflation. Unemployment's sold that low. I think with interest rates, mortgage rates, etc.. And so I wonder if part of this soft landing is just that. Despite our recency bias, the actual real impacts of the economy, of the interest rates that we're experiencing now are more in line with historical impacts than something really injurious, like the interest rates that were present in 1981, for example.
Richard Cunningham: Man, I don't know that about Reagan's presidency. I mean, kind of a fertile soil, if you will, to come down and and a lot of those numbers and metrics John. That's interesting.
John Coleman: Yeah. I mean, it was wild to me to to see the numbers and see that, you know, even in 89, which I don't even remember that. Well, mortgage rates being a 10.5%. You know, you think about what would happen today if we announced that mortgage rates were going to go up to ten and a half. I think we're sitting at about eight right now, and it's totally frozen. The mortgage markets, because of all these people locked in to kind of two and a half to 3.5% rates, but we're actually living in a relatively normal interest rate environment right now. And it's a little inflationary, but it's not actually as inflationary as a lot of prior periods.
Richard Cunningham: Good historical precedent. Well, something else, gentlemen, that I think we need to just have a really sober awareness of and have our eyes on and, and I'd be curious to hear you guys thoughts on implications as it relates back to the markets as just time of conflict. We've seen what's going on in Ukraine and Russia now for an extended period of time. There's even, you know, recent updates to the conflict in the Middle East with Iran and Israel. You know, as you guys think about these international conflicts, what type of implications have there been on markets? Do you expect there to be on markets? Is that stuff priced in? Where are we at currently and what what kind of comments do you guys have there?
Matt Monson: That's a good question. I think, you know, from my perspective right now, the direct implications are limited to the energy markets in terms of our funds. However, if this spirals into a broader conflict in the Middle East, you know, then we're going to start to see a change in demand. And so one comment that one of my colleagues always uses is that threats to freedom are threats to growth. And we're not seeing threats to freedom yet on our side, but we're actively monitoring that.
John Coleman: Yeah. You know, apart from the obvious human cost. And I think we've all seen that and been praying for that over the last couple of years, whether that be Ukraine or, in Israel and Gaza. What's been surprising to me is how markets are basically assuming these will stay contained, regional conflicts. I think we've seen brief periods where they assumed there was a possibility of a broader outbreak right at the beginning of the Ukraine invasion by Russia. I think we saw more market movements like this could break out. Right when Iran was sending missiles into Israel, there was a pullback, I think, because there was a fear of a broader war with Iran. But right now, my impression is the markets are assuming that these will stay regional conflicts. And especially with regards to the most recent activity in Israel, I think a part of that has been the surprising partnerships that have arisen during that. You know, I think if Iran had attacked Israel and there had been no regional support, I think the chances of all out war would have been higher. To see the Jordanians giving the Israelis airspace and the Saudis offering Israeli support was pretty surprising in the area. You know, traditionally, Iran has been an enemy of many of the Arab states in the region, and they've often viewed Iran as a much greater threat than Israel because it's larger, it's been more historically powerful. It's obviously a different branch of Islam than the dominant Arab powers in the Middle East. But the fact that those Arab powers came to Israel's support in the midst of the Iran bombardment, apart from the obvious conflict in Gaza, was a surprise. And, you know, I'm an amateur at this, but one of my observations is that might have muted some of the reaction, because even the Iranians probably weren't expecting that kind of response from their Arab neighbors. And that probably caused them to be a little bit more cautious in the way they continue to react to the conflict. But right now, it seems like markets are just assuming these will stay regional. And like Matt said, unless there's some indication that this breaks out more broadly or it turns into China invading Taiwan, or something of that nature, which could have real implications on broader U.S. markets. I don't see this having a great impact if it doesn't escape regional conflict.
Richard Cunningham: Well, gents, thank you. I know we've hit you covered a lot of ground, and we're going to go in a fun direction here next because I want to kind of get into the Matt, you are such an admired leader and look to leader in the future of an investing space. And. So we're going to get here into a second. We hear a lot in the news about corporate engagement, proxy voting and things like that. And so I want to go there as you kind of think about that. But before we do that, I want to provide you both just maybe a opportunity to tie a bow on summarize kind of as you look at the economy, markets, all of it, just maybe the Matt Monson John Coleman kind of state of the Union 30 seconds type. Just tie a bow on all of your thoughts as it relates to interest rates conflicts going on. AI disconnect between large caps and small caps, all of it for our listeners.
Matt Monson: Thanks, Richard. You know, one thing we didn't touch on earlier that we're watching closely and we think is really interesting, is that on our team, there's been a lot of work that's been done to look at the impact of shrinking M2 and the impact that we think that's going to have on CPI. And so we think a lot of the M2 that's come out of the system right now, you haven't seen the full effect of that yet on CPI. And so we think that there's actually going to be a reduction in inflation going forward based on actions that have already happened, because there's typically been an 18 month lag. And so we think inflation is still heading in the right direction. You know, given some of my comments earlier around what we see on valuations, we don't feel that the companies we own are stretched at all on valuation. And that's just, you know, you're going to hear that from other active managers as well, because we're not passively deploying dollars into an index and you get what you get. And then we pick each one of our exposures, and we think there's plenty of companies that have really good demand drivers for growth, fair or super attractive valuation. And so we're really constructive on the public equity markets. And then just the greater backdrop of the US economy, we don't see any big risks right now that we're scared about, and certainly not the way that we've had things to talk about over the last 5 or 10 years.
John Coleman: Matt, how do you think about the upcoming election? That's one of my instincts, is that markets will be a little bit muted as the US election plays out because of all these other risks in the economy, so it's hard to see people getting too bullish or bearish absent some sort of shock globally, like we said, a big conflict or something like that. How do you think about the election in 2024 and its impact on markets right now?
Matt Monson: Yeah, when it comes to elections, usually there's an unknown party, and a known party, and in some cases after a president's been there for two terms, it's two unknown parties. We have an interesting dynamic right now. We have two known parties. We had a former president, a sitting president, and we're going to end up with one of them. And so I think that there's less risk and less uncertainty heading into this election than there have been. And, you know, many, if not all previous elections.
Richard Cunningham: Interesting. Well, thank you both, gentlemen. So, Matt, let's talk about kind of John, I've been in this season on the FDI podcast of talking about how to how can investors truly get in the game? How can we take more proactive steps forward and be faithful with what the Lord has called us to steward? And I think it should be helpful for listeners at home to hear a little bit about kind of what is your approach been, as you guys think about public equities, investors, corporate engagement, proxy voting, maybe provide a little bit of education there for what this can practically look like for your faith driven investor audience.
Matt Monson: Yeah, I love that question. You know, historically, public equity investors have just bought shares and been along for the ride. Worse yet, many investors don't vote their own shares. They allow someone else to vote their shares for them. And you can guess what happens. That third party has their own set of values that they exercise when they vote your shares. So for faith driven investors, this is particularly problematic because if you own any ETF from a non faith driven ETF fund manager, you can almost be sure that your vote is being cast in conflict with biblical values. So in the world, we focus on how we give away our wealth and we focus on how we spend it. But most people don't think about investing their wealth in line with their values. The faith driven investing industry is taking big leaps forward right now with corporate engagement, which means reaching out to companies and letting them know there's another voice out there. Companies are responding with more neutral agendas as a result than some of the socially aggressive agendas that you maybe are hearing about in the headlines. And so there are multiple different paths to corporate engagement. And so I can outline them. I'm really I'm thrilled with what we're seeing right now. So there's a number of different firms out there that are reaching out to companies and moving their agenda in a really positive way. We have a little bit different approach at Sovereign Capital, so we're engaging with the CEOs of publicly traded companies to bring them together around roundtables and to meet one another to learn best practices from one another. But we want to see them do is hear from their peers about what's working well to enable human flourishing and what works really well to build better cultures, because we want to see those companies installing chaplaincy, installing employee benevolence funds, and really changing the face of what public companies look like.
Richard Cunningham: Man, that's really encouraging. So for those at home listening, wondering, man, I just I feel so disconnected from my investments. There are practical steps you can take as a shareholder and how encouraging also that there are, you know, shareholders that are running ETFs and these other kind of fund structures who are engaging large company CEOs. And you heard Matt talking about it, bring them together to kind of be inspired and encouraged together. And Matt, you know, maybe help, you know, kind of orient people around the sovereigns public equities approach. You guys specifically invest in Christ following leaders of publicly traded companies, correct?
Matt Monson: Yeah, we do. If I sum it all up in just a few quick seconds, we believe that culture is the greatest competitive advantage in business and that if you invest in a company with a faith driven leader who's building an exceptional culture to love and care for their people, that you'll end up attracting and retaining some of the best talent in the marketplace, and that if you have a company with phenomenal talent, it looks like a sports team with all the best players, you should be able to outperform the competition. And so that's the thesis behind what we do. We believe that there's no trade off between culture and performance. And in fact, the greater the culture, the greater the performance.
Richard Cunningham: That's awesome. Well, gentlemen, before we go to Matt and kind of have Matt share a little bit of a personal encouragement, I just what the Lord's been teaching him in Scripture. Any closing thoughts, any any kind of saved rounds before we exit today's episode.
John Coleman: I'm reminded, you know, we're recording this the week of Passover, and it started yesterday, which is April 22nd as we're recording this. And I am in a unique seat in that I have a number of family members who are Jewish and a lot of friends who are Jewish. And in the news right now in the United States, we're seeing actually a rise in antisemitism across the country. And I think that's caused me just to reflect on the importance of Judaism in Christianity and the important ties between those two groups, and just the important humanity of refusing to kind of discriminate against people on the basis of their race or religion or other things. And just a real heart for this. What should be an incredibly special time for Jewish people right now? But I know in the US at least, it's been marked by a lot of fear. If you look at university campuses, etc. and so without weighing in on the conflict in the Middle East too much, it's just been on my heart how tied Judaism and Christianity are, how important it is that the Jews in our country feel welcome and safe, and that during this Passover season that they feel celebrated and welcomed by those of us who are their brothers and sisters. So I know that's not exactly a reflection from Scripture, Richard, but it's been on my heart a little bit this week of Passover with some of the images that I've been seeing in the news, just, on university campuses and elsewhere.
Richard Cunningham: Thanks for sharing. John, appreciate that. Matt, what is Lord been kind of teaching you in Scripture lately.
Matt Monson: Yeah. There's this verse. It's so countercultural that I just want to bring to the forefront for everyone. It's first Thessalonians 5:16 to 18. It's what I call direction for living. It says, rejoice always, pray continually, give thanks in all circumstances, for this is God's will for you in Christ Jesus. What would it be like if we all did that every day, every time something bad comes your way? If that was our response.
Richard Cunningham: Man, that's so good, so good. Well folks, this has been a marks on the markets episode with Matt Monson of Sovereign Capital. Matt, what a joy to have you on. Thank you for sharing. You just kind of profound wisdom and insight on the capital markets. John, as always, what a joy to get to do this alongside you and folks. We will catch you next time.