Episode 90 – Kingdom Trust: God, Money, & Bitcoin with Matt Jennings

Subscribe to the Podcast:

Bitcoin is no longer a bit-player investment. According to Matt Jennings, faith driven investors should be investing in digital assets like cryptocurrency. And just who is Matt Jennings? He is the head of Kingdom Trust which is currently custodian to $20 billion in assets from some 150,000 investors. Learn more from this pioneer in the financial industry and thought-leader in alternative and digital assets.


Episode Transcript

Some listeners have found it helpful to have a transcription of the podcast. Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it. The FDI movement is a volunteer-led movement, and if you’d like to contribute by editing future transcripts, please email us.

Matt Jennings: Most people want to do something they want to do-have-be instead of be-do-have, so I’ll explain that. So most people want to do something, so then they’ll have something and then they think they’ll be something, right? So in other words, they’re going to work hard. They’re going to make a lot of money and they’re going to be a successful person that really just makes no sense. The more you think about it. And what we’ve been called to do is to be something and then we’ll do something and then we’ll have something, right? And the key is the being.

Henry Kaestner: Welcome back to the Faith Driven Investor and even Faith Driven Entrepreneur podcast Luke is with me. Look, I think we’ve got an opportunity to do this. Take this conversation with our friend Matt Jennings. A lot of different ways. It’s great to be in the studio with you.

Luke Roush: Yeah. The two four FDE and FDI on one

Henry Kaestner: the big day. And we’re going and it’s taking us to a state that you love. Why do you love the state of Kentucky?

Luke Roush: Wonderful state of Kentucky is where my parents have lived for the last twenty four years. And it’s a wonderful place. I’m the Kentucky Derby, among many other things, home of many large white tailed deer. As Matt Jennings has repeatedly reminded me of, they are voracious text thread. Thank you, Matt.

Henry Kaestner: That makes it sounds like there are probably fewer white tailed deer because of of Matt Jennings being in that state.

Matt Jennings: Now there’s actually probably a whole lot more. I spend a great amount of money and time feeding and taking care of the herd in Kentucky.

Henry Kaestner: That’s awesome. All right. Good. Good. Good. All right. So we’ve never had an episode where we’ve gone into the theology of hunting, and this is probably not going to be the first one. Let’s go ahead. Let’s talk about your entrepreneurial journey. Let’s talk about what you do with structuring of IRAs. You’re a custodian. You’ve been involved in crypto. So many different things. But what we do with every one of our podcasts, of course, is we try to understand the story of our guest and you and I got a chance to hang out together at the Christian Economic Forum, where Luke was two, of course. And then Luke put together this great junket where we got a chance to go on a road trip to visit a number of the sovereign’s portfolio companies in you. And I got a chance to sit next to each other for a couple of hours going through northern Alabama. And I heard just an absolutely awesome story, and it was just such a no brainer to make sure that you got on. And can you give us a fly over? Who is Matt Jennings and what makes you tick?

Matt Jennings: Oh wow. So born and raised in here in Murray, Kentucky, a little town in western Kentucky, great parents growing up went into my dad’s business, started working there. He owned a meat wholesale meat distributor ship. Well, actually, I started out as a boat mechanic. Believe it or not, and then was part fitter for a period of time at a chemical plant in my early twenties. Didn’t go to college, barely made it through high school. I knew I wasn’t probably cut out for college, so I did the boat mechanic. The pipefitter ended up working in my dad’s meat business till about twenty four and always had a very entrepreneurial mind. Spirit did a lot of things on the side. Through that time, but really made the big step out in 2004 and quit working for the family business kind of left the comfort zone and stepped out. I actually took a job for way less money in the real estate business as a real estate appraiser learned that trade ended up buying the company that I worked for in about six months after I went to work there and began real estate investing really at that time, and God really blessed that saw just really quickly when I grew my appraisal company to the largest one in this area of Kentucky and then began to buy and sell. Ironically, a lot of hunting farms in Kentucky, recreational farms, and that was where I saw my first true, you know, I guess you’d say, like, really true financial success, but I had a burden and a heart and I wanted to do more. And that’s when I started a founded, a company called SPG, which is the Saved by Grace Company, and we formed that company to have both a real estate company. And this crazy idea we had of starting a trust company here in Kentucky so that people could buy real estate and other alternative investments in their tax free tax deferred retirement accounts. And so we we did that in two thousand and nine. I put that together. We actually got it going in 2010, and that’s when Kingdom Trust was born and that was built to be a faith driven company with Chuck and Randy. A couple of buddy of mine started that.

Henry Kaestner: So you end up being. Now, fast forward didn’t go to college. A pipe fitter, a bunch of different types of things. You end up getting real estate investing. Maybe we’ll touch on that. But now one of the largest custodians of digital assets and currencies in the United States, and there’s a faith story in there and you talk about being saved by grace is being one of the the titles of the company. Did you grow up as a Christian? Tell us a bit about your faith.

Matt Jennings: It is. So I grew up. I actually went to a Christian school. My mom and dad are great Christian people. I went to a pretty strict Christian environment when I was in grade school, started in kindergarten. Into the private Christian school, very small school, and I’m very much had rebellion in my teenage years against that. You know, when I say it was a strict environment, it was a very strict environment. And so I really rebelled against that and actually leaving my end of my sophomore year going into my junior year, I was asked to leave the Christian school. That’s a nice way of saying I got kicked out. And so I went to the local public school here, my junior and senior year of high school, and it kind of went a little bit crazy, did some things I shouldn’t do and ended up kind of on the on the wrong side of where I should have been in. But to go back when I was 12 years old, walk the aisle and said the prayer and got dunked under the water. And I clearly remember that I did it through a sense of guilt, and I think I was kind of in some trouble and that was a good way to smooth some things over at home. But I would say between the ages of 12 and thirty four thirty five in two thousand four, which ironically I just mentioned, is another year the same year that I quit my family business and went out on my own. Also, the same year that I truly came to faith and it’s all tied together. But I would say I’d probably ask God to save me hundreds, if not thousands of times, and finally got to the point never felt anything and finally got to the point in life where I really would just say that I just almost forgot about God. I didn’t know if I really believed or didn’t. I was having trouble seeing him in my life. Got married to Kelly, a wonderful wife. When I was twenty one, she was 16 at the time. My goodness. Neither one of us had a job. So our first job I made two hundred dollars a week and she made fifty four dollars a week bagging groceries at Kroger. You know, we just kind of went from there. But fast forward, when we were in our thirties, we had two kids worked in my dad’s family business. I had really gotten off base, had some addictions and things that, you know, not being fruitful in my life. I wasn’t being a good husband. And she saw that and confronted me with that, and we split up for a matter of just a few days. But during that few days, it was a moment I set out on a porch on my farm and just told God. I said, You know, first time I talked to you in years, God. But I don’t know if I believe in you or not, but if if you’re really there, you know, prove it to me. And long story short, over the next couple of days, some really cool things and a guy named Ricky came into my life who was my parents’ pastor at the time, and I went and talked to him and through that ended up realizing that God did love me and that he’d been after me for a long time, and that a whole lot of the reason I was in the situation I was in was because I was running from that calling. So, yeah, so I made a pact to change my life. And that was the moment when I gave my heart to Christ and my wife and I work things out. A couple of months later, she gave her heart to Christ, and I quit my job because I felt like my entrepreneurial calling was one of the big things. That was a problem between me and my wife because she was a security person and I wanted to branch out and go do all kinds of crazy things like entrepreneurs do. And after that moment, she completely devoted to backing me and trusting me, and that allowed me to go and try out some of those crazy things and with her by my side. And so we did.

Luke Roush: How did you invite her into that entrepreneurial journey? I think this is actually a really interesting topic that we have not explored fully on the podcast previously. But you know, many times, whoever the trailing spouse is, if their spouse is an entrepreneur, that person’s generally kind of outrunning, creating, seeing the future, trying to create that, trying to respond to what they feel like is God’s call in their life. How did you invite Kelly into that alongside you after her being really on the outside in the early years of your marriage?

Matt Jennings: Yeah. So I felt like I had invited her in before and got a negative obviously response which to her was just she was a person who, you know, a mom. She was a young mom. We had kids that were, I think, two and four at the time. And for her, it was a big deal for me to quit my job and go start a business or whatever. And so once we came together on that, it was really. Boy, I don’t know how to say it any way other than I let her know that that was really hurting me and how that made me feel, where I hadn’t really let her know that before, and she let me know some things that I was doing that really made her feel. If you’ve ever read the book, Love and Respect read, so I really felt disrespected that she didn’t trust me to go out and make a living on my own. She felt really kind of unloved. Some of the ways that I was treating her and what we figured out was we’d been in this cycle of she’d been saying things or doing things that made me feel disrespected. I had been in return saying things that made her feel unloved. They call it the crazy cycle, I think, in that book. And we just had grown apart. And really, it all started with just something small. And what we did that day would just come back together and decide that we were going to love and respect each other. And so she had to make that sacrifice or surrender or whatever you want to say to say, you know, what is the man he has? He has these dreams. He has this name. I love him. So I’m going to support him even if it scares me to death. And so I really just have to give all that credit to her for reaching that point of saying yes, I’m going to back him, even if it scares me to death.

Henry Kaestner: I guess that’s been a great investment with an incredible ROI.

Matt Jennings: Yeah, yeah, it’s been really good.

Henry Kaestner: So talk to us through a bit of your speaking impact investments. Tell us a bit about how you’ve thought about real estate investing.

Matt Jennings: I love you. I, of course, I became an appraiser by trade, a real estate appraiser. So I’m big on numbers and big on data I’m big on. I believe that you make at least 50 percent, if not more, of your money when you buy at the moment, you buy it. So I’m a bargain investor. I’m big on cash flow using the proper amount of leverage not to get overleveraged, but in real estate. The goal is to take something that makes six or eight percent net return leverage to make, you know, 15 or 20 percent return and do it in a manner where you have insurance. If it burns, you know, pretty low risk where your only real risk is, you know, not being able to find a tenant to rent it. I’ve been really blessed the town I’m in the last 10 years of average ninety nine point two percent occupancy rates in all my rental buildings. So I do a lot of multifamily, I do a few other things as well. But you know, we build a lot. The last five years, I’ve started a building company, so we build most of our own multifamily properties. I had a management company who are sold to a young man that trained under me. I sold him that business and he manages all my properties, and I’ve found that managing properties yourself. Once you get to a particular point, I think it’s great in the beginning. As you learn, once you get to a particular point, you end up hating them. Sometimes if you manage them as opposed to looking at them as a set of numbers, you get to emotionally connected to both the tenants and the experience. Sometimes we try to be faith based. It’s a faith based company that manages my apartment, so we try to treat. Our tenants will look a little bit about

Luke Roush: what that looks like. If you wouldn’t mind Matt about the here, just

Matt Jennings: how your faith, you know, impacts, he does all the managing. So I’m really pretty hands off in that business. My daughter actually just went to work for him with the ambitions of probably her one day managing all my stuff. So he knows he’s kind of probably training his future competition, but he’s doing that as a favor to me. But, you know, I think it’s just love on them for us. You know, we try to be fair to them and we try to love on them. We try to be to show them grace and mercy and understand when they’re in situations. If we know something’s going on in their personal life, you know, with a death or something that you know, something that’s creating sorrow in their life, we try to reach out. And just with a note of, you know, hey, we’re thinking about you and just, you know, just try to go above and beyond, and we’re always open to talk to them to, especially for new people that have moved in because we get it, we do. A lot of college students were in a college town here, with Murray State homogeneous Morant, Memphis Grizzlies now. So we get a lot of kids moving in, so we’re open. Always ask them if they’re looking for a church locally. We’re happy to point them in a few different directions there. We’re not stuck on any one, but we kind of know the ones that we feel like we’ll take them in and love on them. And, you know, treat them like we should treat our brothers and sisters. So that’s how we look at that.

Luke Roush: So maybe a little bit more to just the tension that you feel. So I’m going to come back and pick on something you said a second ago just because I think it’s in. Christine, I think it’s something that a lot of investors feel as you get closer to your investments and as you get closer to portfolio companies, CEOs and kind of all that, you start to really identify and empathize kind of with the situation that they’re in. And yet at the same time, you know, particularly in real estate, right? There’s an obligation to kind of look after the property. How do you hold those things in tension? How do you know when to give grace and when to kind of hold the line and just love to have you speak into how God’s spoken to your heart on that topic?

Matt Jennings: Boy, that’s one that I honestly, I would do my best to to say how I do that, but it’s a hard thing. There’s a great book, actually. I think about that. It’s called Love Works by Joel. Maybe you guys have read that that I’ve had look back to several times when I find myself in situations about how do I deal with this in a loving way, but in a way that is in the best interest of everyone involved? Right. So one thing I learned a long time ago is to avoid I’m a non conflict part. I don’t like conflict, and that hurt me a lot in my early days and I’ve learned to kind of walk up and open the door of the lion’s cage and walk in is always a better scenario and confront it. And, you know, based on how the person on the other side takes that confrontation criticism, then that’s when you have to make a decision of what’s best for everyone involved. Because any time it has to do with an organization, it’s not just you and them involved. There’s a lot of other people, employees, investors and things as well. So I just always try to think about what’s in the best interest overall when I make those decisions.

Luke Roush: Yeah, that’s good.

Matt Jennings: It’s hard.

Henry Kaestner: Before we get back into the investing side and go over and talk about what you’re doing with crypto now, because crypto is all the rage and your business is just absolutely exploded. I want to touch on something that’s more consistent with your entrepreneurial journey and that you’ve developed a drive to serving other entrepreneurs in a way that will ultimately point them to knowing God. Can you tell us a little bit about that framework that you’re in the process of developing? I just found it really encouraging. Walk us through that.

Matt Jennings: Yeah, I found myself in a really low point in March for New Journey Back several years ago. And I mean, when I say low point, I was at a really, really low point and it was a mixture. I think of personal, entrepreneurial, just a lot of stuff, you know, midlife for me, I don’t know, but and I began to search. I started in first, started in the Bible, sought out counsel from Christian friends, all of which was somewhat helpful. But I ended up joining a kind of a secular group for businessmen, CEOs, presidents, things like that and learned a whole lot through that. But it really gave me an idea through that is what I tell you that story. So once I, I just had this light bulb moment and I discovered so many things about myself through that process. And so when I got through that, I began to write things down and I decided I just wanted to share it with other entrepreneurs because I felt many times lonely. I know you guys say it’s a lonely journey. I felt so lonely at that point in my career, I felt almost like I was on an island by myself, and there was no one I could talk to. And I just have a passion for men who find themselves in that situation, and I felt so alone. I want to be there for those guys. So I started putting this together of ran a few groups through it. It’s still unfinished. I pretty well do it on the fly, but it’s really a self exploration. I don’t. When I’ve done it, I just put it on Facebook and say, Hey, do you feel lonely? You know, these struggles sometimes. Do you feel empty? And you know, each time I’ve had eight or 10 guys sign up and it’s really just like a coaching program, but we ask them a lot of questions because what I’ve found is that guys like me and you, Henry, we’re not necessarily really easy to teach things sometimes, but we’re really easy to challenge, right? We don’t necessarily listen if somebody says what you need to do this. I like to figure out myself what I’m going to do. I’ve no idea.

Luke Roush: We’re not talking about Matt at all.

Matt Jennings: That’s kind of an entrepreneur. So I kind of go at it from that angle and I call it the juice because I don’t know if you guys have ever been fishing and stuff like that, but it’s like, you know, the secret sauce. You know, it’s the juice. I got the juice, you know, so I start out by telling the guys that, Hey, you know, I know I’ve got this secret sauce. I got the juice that can set you free from how you’re feeling right now. And I tell them that are going to learn what that is through this about eight week process as we go through now and we start out with some basic questions. And I mean, I’d love to share a few of the questions with you and let you guys ponder on them if you’d like to hear just officially. Yes. OK, so so we start out by asking, who are you? Then we finish that question. With something that’s very profound, we say, really, really, who are you? Very few of them know who they really are. Now start trying to tell you what they do, right? And if you tell them that’s not it, they’ll start going into what they do at home, right? How many kids they have husband, father, whatever. No, no, no, no, no. Who are you, really? So that’s how we start out. And the very next question we ask them is where you’re at in your life right now. Would you say that you are being told through life by passion or push through life, by fear? Mm.

Henry Kaestner: That’s good. What’s the percentage response either way?

Matt Jennings: Ninety five percent have said, pushed by fear of only actually only had one out of about 20 guys that said passion. And two days later, he decided his might be fear. But yeah, so we just we go through a lot of that kind of stuff. We asked them this question to as entrepreneurs, as guys, right? We’re providers and what have you. We’re always trying to get somewhere or get something right. You feel like you wake up every day trying to get some more or get something. So we asked him this question What good is it going to do to you to get somewhere or get something if you sacrifice everything in the process?

Henry Kaestner: I like that. Get somewhere or get something. You know, Luke and I have got a great friend named Tim Oakley, who says We’re always selling something to somebody. And just there is this concept of just trying to make it happen. So you’re trying to get something or get somewhere? Yeah.

Matt Jennings: And what good is it going to do to you to get there if you sacrifice everything in the process? And that leads into some principles around that. The journey is the destination in my life. I don’t know if you guys have ever felt this, but I went through a period where I was like climbing this ladder. I was climbing this ladder, climbing and climbing and climbing it every day, and all I wanted to do is get to the top right. That was the destination was to get to the top of the ladder and climbing this wall on this ladder. I want to get to the top of the ball and get to the other side because that was like the Promised Land, I thought. And so I’ve climbed this ladder climbing it. And then finally, I get to the top and I look over and there’s nothing on the other side. And I think what so many men where we mess up men and women is the journey is the destination. There is no destination in life here on Earth. The journey here on Earth is the reward, it is the destination. And we should live it one day at a time, as Jesus taught one day at a time, not looking backward, not looking forward, living in today and making the best of each and every day. Stop trying to get somewhere and get something. Frantically, you know, the Bible says, Why do you rise early and go to bed late? Eating the bread of anxious toil God provides for those he loves as they sleep. There’s just so much wisdom in that verse, and so then we go in to talking about doing and being, you know, most people want to do something they want to do have be instead of Baidu have. So I’ll explain that. So most people want to do something, so then they’ll have something and then they think they’ll be something, right? So in other words, they’re going to work hard. They’re going to make a lot of money and they’re going to be a successful person that really just makes no sense. The more you think about it. And what we’ve been called to do is to be something and then we’ll do something and then we’ll have something. And the key is the being so there’s there’s never been a human doing. There’s never been a spiritual doing. There’s human beings and spiritual beings. Which leads me to another question. We asked our guys is would you consider yourself a human being having a spiritual experience or a spiritual being having a human experience?

Henry Kaestner: Mm-Hmm. So this is as you lead them into faith because I know that there’s a good number of these folks, unlike the Faith Driven Entrepreneur, of course, that we have, which is primarily focused on Christ virus because it starts off with call to create an identity crisis. We’re right up there. Was curious through this framework. When you start introducing your faith into it, whether it’s on the being side. Talk to us a little bit more about that. Does it ever conversation, ever turn back around to you and somebody says, Well, what about you? What about you, man? Who are you being?

Matt Jennings: So the first several weeks of it, I don’t mention God. Obviously, we talk about spirituality, but I never go into who God is. We just talk through these principles and we start going through all kinds of principles. We talk about learning your yes, is in your nose, and we talk about how I believe that we’ve all been created to win but programed to fail, right? Or created for success, but program for failure. And so we talk about all those things, and in the end, about week eight, we kind of say, Hey, just so you know, all of these things I just taught you came from one guy. Would you like to know who that guy is? Because I’d love to share with you who the guy is if you’re interested. And that’s what we’re going to do next week. If you want to come back for the final week, I’m going to tell you who the guy is and and that’s when we start out in Matthew five, because most of these principles comes right out of the Beatitudes. In the sermon on the Mount, the Jesus taught about getting your head and your heart aligned. You know, Jesus said blessed is he whose head and heart is aligned because then he’ll be able to see God in the outside world. Blessed is he who’s at the end of the rope because there he’ll find less of himself and more of God. And a lot of what we’re talk about in the group is about getting your head aligned with your heart. And so in the end, we go through and we show them where this came from. And the overwhelming response I’ve gotten to this point has been that’s not the Jesus I was taught about. That doesn’t even like I never even caught a hint that that would have been something from the Bible or that Jesus would have taught. Right? And so that gives me an opportunity to then share that, you know, the Bible is not a rule book. It’s a love story. And so many people, particularly in my area where I live in what they call the Bible Belt, or at the time of the Southern Bible Belt Country. And so, so many people have what I call this wrong impression of God and Jesus, and that gives me a chance to I’ve already had eight weeks to show them that love before they turn around and try to run from it. That makes sense. It does. So yeah, what

Henry Kaestner: you’ve done is you systematically shown them their need for a savior in their something’s, not altogether right, and that the framework that they had their belief system has been letting them down. They’re feeling driven by something, and they realize that it’s not going to the place where they want. They know their priorities are out of whack and it’s not revealing their type of fulfillment. So you’ve helped them walk through that framework to get there and then you’re showing them a better way.

Luke Roush: Yeah. Just to interject. How do you go from, you know, real estate and hunting farms? We talked a little bit about the gravel mine that we started, which I’m pumped to go see myself at some point. But how do you transition from that into a trust company and what we now know to be a pretty meaningful platform for cryptocurrency? So maybe just talk a little bit about that pivot or what God did through that and then maybe also speak to why cryptocurrency is something that believers should be interested in understanding more about and what the redemptive potential is for that instrument.

Matt Jennings: So Kingdom came about from my love of real estate, and I wanted to put it in my retirement account. I found that process very difficult. At first, I was told it was impossible, then it became difficult, and I found out it’s not impossible or difficult. So I thought, Hey, somebody needs to start a company to do this. So that was the original kind of idea behind Kingdom Trust. Once we started it, we had to become a regulated trust company, just like a bank. We’re chartered in South Dakota. We had to do all that to started and few years into it, I was not the CEO early on and I was just a founder and I think I was executive vice president or something. But I was running a real estate business kind of separate from that and a few years into it. Things weren’t going so well, and in 2014 I got asked by my partners in the board to become the CEO, which was one of the hardest times in my life. I really did not desire to lead a large group of people. I never felt like that was my calling. That’s the reason I didn’t choose to be the CEO. In the beginning, when I founded the company, so I sat at my desk one night and there was two books laying on my desk. I had my head down. I was praying. I was just honestly kind of lost. It was after I’d been asked to take it over. It was broke in a very bad situation and I looked up and there was a dictionary and a Bible. I felt like I just felt like something, said the answer to your problems is in this. I ran the numbers every way there was and there was no way to manage out of this problem. We had to grow out of it because we just weren’t big enough. We had at the time, we had about 900 million in assets under custody. I think we were maybe a thousand or two thousand customers. And I opened the dictionary and I looked at growth and I wrote the definition of a down. And I took G R, O W, T h, and I started looking through my Bible and thinking and I wrote down on G. I put goals. And the definition in the dictionary was an object of a person’s ambition, effort or a desired result. So I put down this is a note to myself. Have I still have this same original paper in my desk? I read it every day. Have a clear vision and an open mind. Think big and always stay focused on the goal. And I put four r. I put reward in. The definition of that in the dictionary was something given in recognition of one service, effort or achievement. And I said always inspire, motivate, appreciate, recognize and reward others that help you achieve your goals. And I put O Orchestrate a range or direct for a desired effect or performance. And I wrote a note to myself Orchestrate a team that is talented individuals at each play their part in the overall performance and reach the goals and always reward them. You got to remember, this is a guy, it’s taken over a company without an education, don’t know how to run it. It’s kind of a Wall Street company. And I’m a part fitter and a boat mechanic. So, so, so then I got the W and I said, Wow, and I look that up and it said to impress or stop someone greatly. And I said, Always strive to wow your customers, friends, employees and family by going above and beyond to meet their needs and and exceed their expectations. I got to tell you, I put trust and this was been the big one for me. I think because I was, as I said, was a little bit. I had a fear of being a leader. So on trust, I looked it up and it said firm belief in the reality, truth and ability or strength of someone or something. And I wrote, always be honest and ethical with high integrity. Be a servant leader at home and at work that people will follow toward the goal, not because it’s required of them, but because they trust you. And then I got to H, and the first word that came to me was humble, which I looked up in the dictionary and it said, not proud or arrogant, modest to be humble, although successful. And the note I wrote to myself was always Remember where you came from and who put you there? Keep faith and family as your top priority. Always keep your trust in God and others. Lead with love and never look down on anyone. Make tough decisions decisively with care and compassion for others, but always in the overall best interest of everyone involved. Give help those in need knowing that the ultimate goal is to see the one in which you have put your trust and what he is orchestrated on your behalf. Wow, what a humbling moment and a magnificent reward. And then I put a verse on there Matthew twenty three twelve who ever exalts himself, will be humbled and who ever humbled themself will be exalted. And I honestly, I wrote down below that because I didn’t have a plan. Didn’t really know what kind of plan to have. I put focus on the principles and the performance will take care of itself. And I wrote that that night and I will never forget it. I met with my who was my personal account, and at the time he did no work for the business at all. And I asked him to help me figure out a growth plan for the business, and I told him how many accounts I thought we could grow. And we wrote all this stuff out and did a five year plan. And it looked really great on paper, but I had no idea what I was really talking about and he didn’t either. It’s kind of ironic. I forgot all about that plan, and about a year ago, I actually ended up hiring him about two or three years ago. He’s now my CFO, and about a year or two ago, he came running in my office and he said, Man, I was going through some old paperwork and I found that he said, You remember that, not that you came to my office and we built this growth plan for Kingdom. I said, Yeah, I remember that night. It’s the same night I wrote this growth thing here. He said, I want you to see something. And he laid down that growth plan and he laid down Kingdom’s financials for that five years and they were within point two, five percent of each other every year, year after year, for five years. At that moment, I thought, Oh, wow, how amazing, because we neither one of us had any clue that not we sat down and did that. So that’s kind of my faith story there and how God came back five years later to say I was there that night.

Henry Kaestner: See, as you go through your growth framework, I didn’t write them all down and I haven’t seen it before. But the humility which you ended with shows itself in all of the different letters. The other thing that showed up was an interest in others. A couple of different times you talked about rewarding others along the way and being thoughtful about others that came through at least three times, if not more. And talk a little bit about the culture at Kingdom Trust we’re going to bridge into. For those of us who are listening, wondering about crypto and in your take on crypto, we’re going to get there. But I think that these lessons along the way, because how many? What do you have now? Under custodian assets, more than 10 billion write

Matt Jennings: about 20 billion, 20 billion at one hundred and hundred, and forty thousand customers are thinking about around 20 billion.

Henry Kaestner: OK, so how do you get there? Is it a brilliant technology algorithm? Is it some sort of massive arbitrage or is it the ability to lead a team well toward an end goal and get them fired up about achieving it? And my sense is that rather than some sort of major financial. Well, engineering deal, though, I think know when you get to 20 billion dollars of assets, you surely have to have a competency when you scale 140000 customers. You got to have a nail down shop. You’ve got to have great process and procedure and you’ve got to take away a lot of friction. But along the way, you got to lead people talk about the culture that’s come about since you sat down with that growth framework and what it looks like their work at Kingdom Trust.

Matt Jennings: Yeah, leading those people was the biggest fear of my life. I’m just being honest. It’s something that I have. Public speaking and leading people were the two things I never thought I would ever do in my life. So and I do a lot of both now and in have learned to enjoy it. But so I just started empowering people at the time that I wrote that we had about 20 employees. We got down to about maybe four that we kept through that we had a lot of people in the wrong bus, we had a lot of people in the wrong seats on the bus. When I came in and we had a lot of people that didn’t buy into the change that I was making because I we changed everything about the company after that and it was one of the more difficult times in my life. But over about a four or five month period, we maneuvered everybody around and went from 20 employees to about twenty five, but only kept four of the original 20 and. The four that we kept are three of them are still there today. Amen, they’re my posse. We’ve been in the trenches together and they have been and will be greatly rewarded, particularly when we choose one day to exit. And I’ve tried to reward them, but we also had a light that came in in that original 20, something that I hired back. Most of those are all still there. We’ve got about one hundred and twenty, I think now one hundred and fifty somewhere in there. So man, I just always try to love and we have we had Friday morning meetings and always try to share something with them in that meeting. That’s totally nothing to do with work and be vulnerable and open and transparent as I possibly can and be someone, as I said in the T. Someone that they will follow because they trust me. Not because they think I’m right. Not because they think they have to or or else, you know, they’ll get fired or whatever. Someone that they will get behind me and follow me into this crazy market that we went into that pretty much nobody in Murray, Kentucky, understands or knows about until they come in to work for us. We’re the only company in that type of industry here. So they all learn in-house, but they come in and they they will follow because they trust me. And now it’s not only just me, it was me then. Now it’s because they trust the other people. And since then, I’ve moved to chairman. About a year ago, we hired a young guy, a very successful guy named Ron. Brad Laffey started a company called CoinShares over in Europe. It’s now a publicly traded company, kind of similar to what we do. But over in Europe, he’s now the CEO and I step back from that CEO, and now he leads the charge. Very faith driven, very driven guy. And now he’s the guy that they really follow on a day to day basis, and they trust him and they believe in him in what we do. And so we made the switch into crypto in 2015. We actually started cursing crypto. In 2016, we became the first regulated financial institution in America to custody bitcoin and crypto. Some people say we were the first regulated financial institution in the world. I’ve never done the data research on the world. I know for positive. We were the very first one in the United States. And with that has come a lot of blessings and a lot of challenges. In the early days, we definitely had a bull’s eye on our back when we chose to step out on that limb.

Luke Roush: I’d love to just maybe have you wrap. We always try to kind of wrap with how God is speaking to you now, Matt, and what you believe he’d have you share with the audience that you haven’t already shared. You’re a winsome guy who’s had a lot of wonderful experiences and a lot of success, and in many ways, an unlikely road moving into trust crypto, just as you talked through. But what has God put on your heart recently? And what would you leave our listeners with?

Matt Jennings: Well, we’re talking to entrepreneurs, so I think the first thing would just be encouragement that I look back through my entrepreneurial experiences and there’s been ups, there’s been downs, there’s been some really high highs and some really low lows. And what I’ve figured out was there is many times that I felt like God wasn’t speaking to me and looking back, I know now it’s because I was doing all the talking and listen, be still and know that I am God. You know, I would say when you’re in the tough spot, listen to God and the people who are unbiased and love you all around you. That would be number one. And the other one would be a question that I ask my guys kind of goes along with questions that were asked and earlier is what does wealth really mean to you? And really, really sit down and think about really what this will mean to you. You know, and I’ll tell you what it means to me. Yeah, to me, wealth means all my needs are met physically, emotionally, relationally, everything right, like all my needs are met and they’re met abundantly. That’s what wealth means to me. But I would challenge each person thinking about what does well mean to you. I hope it’s so much more than money to the guys and gals that are listening to this. And once you kind of think about what is wealth to you, then are you really pursuing and chasing true wealth? Are you chasing something else? Right? So that would be kind of my challenge to everybody.

Henry Kaestner: That’s very good word, ma’am. May I thank you for your friendship, your encouragement. Thank you for getting out there and miss all the different things you’ve got going on. Actually, point in the eyes of these 20 men because I know how much you’ve grown, how much you scaled. Most people in your position would say, I just don’t have the time. And yet you’ve done that. You’ve been really intentional about getting folks involved. And and that’s encouragement to me as encouragement to Luke, and we’re grateful to partner with you in the ministry.

Matt Jennings: I’d just like to say to you before I get off your guys, that for years I ran a faith driven company and I did not know a single other Faith Driven Entrepreneur other than myself and my two buddies. And I think that’s one reason that my journey seems so lonely at times. And I found you guys just six months ago, whatever it’s been now. And I honestly just wake up every day more encouraged through that, and, you know, I’ve signed up for one of your classes with, you know, I don’t even remember who I signed up with the leader. I just kind of did any MIT mo. But I’m super excited about doing that. But I’m so pumped and excited to see Henry that God gave you the vision to go out and reach guys like me. And I have the same vision in many ways, but honestly, I did not know how to move that vision forward, and it’s so cool. The first time that I honestly, the first time I went to your website, I got tears in my eyes and was just like, Why haven’t I seen this before? You know, because what you guys are putting together there is amazing. So kudos to you guys for what you’re putting together. It’s great

Luke Roush: encouragement. It’s a great and charisma.

Henry Kaestner: That’s that’s awesome. So we’re going to put you in a cohort with a bunch of other guys did all this. We try to keep it above those that have above $20 billion in custodial assets. And so you’re going to love this group of people. It’ll be you and yourself. We got a great group, we got great cohorts there, and I think we’ve got a five or six hundred people going through FDE groups. If you’re listening to this right now and and you’re interested in joining a group to process how God is working through you and your entrepreneurial life or your investing life, along with people like Matt, please check out the website. Matt, thank you for blessing our audience. Thank you for blessing Luke and I and a new friendship and looking forward to more road trips with your brother.

Episode 91 – Discovering Faith Driven Investing At Harvard with Mary Naber

Subscribe to the Podcast:

Today we’re joined by Mary Naber of Sage Stone Wealth. Mary has spent her entire career in the financial services industry including serving as an SVP and Advisor at Merrill Lynch. Mary’s expertise in the field of ethical investing is highlighted in over half a dozen books and multiple magazines. She joins us today to share her story of finding faith driven investing at Harvard and discuss the value proposition of faith driven investing. Tune in! 


Episode Transcript

Some listeners have found it helpful to have a transcription of the podcast. Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it. The FDI movement is a volunteer-led movement, and if you’d like to contribute by editing future transcripts, please email us.

Mary Naber: It is said to be “Pareto Efficient” when at least at least one person is better off and nobody is worse off. So, in the very last paragraph of my Journal of Investing article: “Individuals and institutions can make a Pareto Efficient move by investing with Catholic or other religious and ethical principles from the comparable return and the added utility and social benefit of a clean conscience.” So, here’s the value proposition with Faith Driven Investing. It’s that at no cost to you, to me or Luke, or anyone listening—at no cost, material or financial, when you choose to integrate your faith and your investments, you gain something amazing in your life today.

Narrator: Welcome to the Faith Driven Investor podcast. If you’re a fund manager, investor or financial advisor driven by your faith, or want to be driven by your faith, then you’re in the right place. The best way to stay connected in the Faith Driven Investor community is to sign up for our newsletter at faithdriveninvestor.org. This podcast doesn’t exist without you, our community. One of the things we’ve heard the community ask us for is help in finding great deals to invest in, and so we’ve launched Marketplace. It’s a new platform of funds and direct deals. Everything from private equity and real estate funds to ETFs. From philanthropic to market rate deals spanning the U.S. and emerging markets. Check it out at faithdriveninvestor.org/marketplace. While you’re there, please send us any thoughts you have about how this podcast might better serve you or any questions you have about being a faith driven investor. 

DISCLOSURE: All opinions expressed on this podcast, including the team and guests, are solely their opinions. Hosts and guests may maintain positions in the companies and securities discussed. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as specific investment advice for any individual or organization.

 

Narrator: Welcome back everyone to the Faith Driven Investor podcast. Our guest today is a trailblazer and also fascinating. Prior to founding Sage Stone, Mary King served as a Senior Vice President Investments and Wealth Management Advisor at Merrill Lynch in Beverly Hills. She is the author of “Catholic Investing – The Financial Effect of Screens” published in the Journal of Investing, the first published empirical research documenting the financial impact of socially conservative screens. Her article, “Christ’s Returns” was featured in Christianity Today twenty years ago and was a precursor to the movement among faith driven investors.

Mary’s expertise in the field of ethical investing is highlighted in over a half a dozen books and multiple magazines. She is the first undergraduate in the history of Harvard University to receive a double major in Economics and Religion, and she did it with honors. She joins us today to revisit the ideas in her article, Christ’s Returns, and reveal how what was a defensible strategy twenty years ago is still defensible today. Let’s listen in.

Henry Kaestner: Welcome back to the Faith Driven Investor podcast. I’m here with my great friend, business partner, lifelong friend Luke Roush. Missing him, he’s moved to Tennessee. We’re just—as we’re talking with Mary, who lives in California—talking about the fact that we used to be able to go down to Capitola and go surfing and stand up paddleboarding at Santa Cruz Harbor and different things like that. So Luke, you are missed.

Luke Roush: Hey, I miss—I miss watching you struggle down there on that surf.

Henry Kaestner: That’s right… Struggling with one of my boys who decided that he was strong enough to not need a wetsuit,

Luke Roush: And that was special. In January. That was very impressive. I am just going to go ahead and go on record.

Henry Kaestner: Yeah, that was maybe a little foolhardy too. He has thawed out, he’s back and I am also back. We had two Faith Driven Investor conferences last week, which were super cool. We had one in Nairobi and we had one in Cape Town, actually right outside of Cape Town in a place got Stellenbosch. And I’ll tell you that God is on—Aslan is on the move. As our friend David Wills likes to say, Aslan is on the move. We had a Faith Driven Investor gathering in Nairobi the February before COVID, so just a couple of years ago, not even two years ago. And seven people came and they were a great seven people. We had a great breakfast, but I thought we might get more. And this time we had one hundred and forty. We had the CEO of Telkom Kenya Mugo Commodities become a friend. He led one of our panels. We had the chairman of the largest insurance company. We had the Senate Majority Leader, everybody getting together and talking about “What can a Kenyan Christian community do to lead the way, putting their own skin in the game, making faith driven investments in Kenya, East Africa and the broader African continent?”. And then the same thing happened a couple of days later in Stellenbosch, an incredible setting and one hundred leading Christian investors that are really serious about their faith and are at the helms of some of the largest investment banks, trading companies and funds in South Africa. Getting together, worshiping together, praying together, it was just, it was super cool. So I’m back now. We are doing the podcast and I’m just really encouraged because there is a movement here and lots of different people are getting it. Pastors are getting it. Individuals are getting it. Again it is a good chance to just, as we get ready to introduce our guest, it’s a great chance to really introduce what is really at the cornerstone of the movement is that it’s really not meant to be prescriptive or presumptuous at all. It’s about us getting down on her knees with our spouses and asking God how we might steward the assets that He’s entrusted us with. And for some, that might be investing in solar farms in the Nevada desert. For others, it might be investing with our Christian brothers and sisters in Nairobi, and some of them it may be taking a new look at the way they manage their public equities. And so for all of that, we have this great honor and this podcast of being able to talk to leaders who’ve been doing this and wrestling with this for a long time. And very few have wrestled with this longer than Mary. And Mary, I’m just I’m really grateful that you’re on with us, and I want to mention one thing that you and I have. And I don’t know if you know this about me, but you and I have the common experience of having worked at Merrill Lynch, Mother Merrill, and I had some formative experiences. My introduction to the financial markets was at Merrill Lynch in Manhattan, downtown in the World Financial Center, where I was actually there for the first World Trade Center bombing, which was a crazy experience. And I learned so much about financial markets and the special privilege that it is to be invited into a family’s life to contemplate some real important decisions around financial planning. There’s an intimacy there that I hadn’t expected in that job, and it was one of the most rewarding parts of it. And so you’ve made a career in doing that. So but I’d like to hear about what your financial experience was. Tell us about it. First of all, welcome to the program. Thanks for joining.

Mary Naber: Thank you, it’s great to be here.

Henry Kaestner: So tell us about it growing up as a kid. What drew you to the financial world? I think that you probably started earlier and maybe were less mercenary about it at the beginning, as I was. I like to think I matured in my thoughts of the financial markets with time. But for me, at the beginning, it was just a job, but you were thoughtful earlier. Tell us about your story growing up. What brought you into it? And yeah, just who are you, where do you come from?

Mary Naber: Thanks. Well, I’m Mary and I’m originally from Salinas, California. I had the tremendous blessing of growing up at the First Presbyterian Church in Salinas. And it was at this small church, where as a young five or six-year-old, I still remember sitting in one of those little wooden chairs during Sunday school and the Sunday school teacher explaining that there is a simple exchange we could make. If we simply ask Jesus to come live in our hearts you could have a best friend forever. And for a little child, the idea of a best friend forever, I mean, it just doesn’t get better. I could exchange something small, my heart, for the unconditional love of the Creator, forgiveness from all sin, redemption, restoration, passion, purpose and a best friend forever. Yes! I’d say that it was also a little lesson in the economics of God: that He is always our best investment. Anything small we give Him, He is faithful to multiply and return. I think about offering five loaves and two fishes, He feeds the 5,000. We plant a mustard seed, He grows it into the largest of garden plants. We give Him our investment portfolio, imagine really the ways that He can multiply that gift for today in eternity. I’ll note that it was also at the First Presbyterian Church where I was enthralled by 80’s worship music, enjoyed the sermons of our pastor, Dr. Ladra…

Henry Kaestner: Who’s your favorite band? 80s worship music. For those of us who remember things like, I don’t know, Jars of Clay, etc.. Amy Grant, who’s your favorite?

Mary Naber: Oh, I really love Jars of Clay as well. Caedmon’s Call, if anyone remembers. I got to host and produce their first concert at Sanders Theater in Harvard. 

Henry Kaestner: Oh wow! 

Mary Naber: Sold out a thousand-seat theater. So that was a fun little investment in college of our Campus Crusade group.

Henry Kaestner: A thousand Harvard students showing up to Caedmon’s Call concert?

Mary Naber: Well, we actually marketed the concert throughout Boston colleges. 

Henry Kaestner: Still, that’s great. Yeah.

Luke Roush: That’s a big win. A big win in Boston.

Mary Naber: Yeah, it’s exciting, it’s great music… But that was the 90’s. But yeah, I was 16, and I set up an appointment to meet with my pastor. I explained to him that I loved every aspect of business, but I love Jesus too. So maybe I should consider going into the ministry. This is 1992, and he said, “Mary, Christians are needed in the business world too.” And it was an absolute paradigm shift for me.

So, when I was about 18 in the fall of 1994, I flew across the country to Cambridge, Massachusetts, to attend Harvard as an undergrad. At the time, I still saw the two fields, my interest in business and love for Jesus, in two separate compartments. I wanted to pursue a double major in econ and religion, and God ended up using one of the most secular universities in the country to challenge me to integrate both fields. Now I set the case at Harvard: at the time, in order to graduate with a double major, a senior was required to write one thesis that combines both fields and would be accepted by both departments as academically rigorous. Well, the Harvard Econ Department also viewed econ and religion in two different spheres. They refused to approve my double major with Religion. They told me the two fields had nothing to do with one another, that the double major had never been done before and that it would be impossible to combine the two. Of course, the econ administrator didn’t know of Jesus’ promise in Matthew 19, Mark 10 and Luke 18, that with God, all things are possible.

And so I accepted the challenge, of course, in the hope and faith that I would find a senior research thesis that worked and maxed out my courses in the Religion department. And I savored seeking out areas where the two fields overlapped. In Professor Diane Eck’s World Religion Course, I wrote my term paper on “Islamic Banking: A Topic of No Interest”. In my sophomore tutorial course, I wrote my research paper on the game theory methods used by three major religious traditions in the recruitment and retainment of attendees, in which I introduced one of the most famous game theory examples, that of Pascal’s Wager—the brilliant argument that it’s always best to bet that God exists. Now in this process, I discovered something quite surprising. I found that economics on its own—the bland macroeconomic problem sets were dry and uninteresting. But economics from a perspective of faith, viewed from an eternal and spiritual perspective, was profoundly more meaningful, joy-filled, fascinating and way more fun.

So at a secular university frequently hostile to the Christian faith, God led me to a passionate commitment to integrating my love for Jesus into economics, business and work and I simply wanted nothing less. So it was actually spring of my junior year where I first became exposed to the practice that was traditionally known as Socially Responsible Investing. For that spring semester, I took a small seminar course at Harvard Divinity School. It was titled “Money Media and Morality: Investing in the Civic Good”, taught at the time by, HDS, Harvard Divinity School’s Director of Corporate Ethics. Yes, HDS was way ahead of the curve in appointing such a director in the mid-90’s. It was in this course that I was first exposed to Socially Responsible Investing, the thoughtful consideration of ethics and values in investment decisions. And for anyone new here at the program, just to cover it, in that course I learned about portfolio screening – that’s the avoidance of sin stocks like tobacco, gambling from one’s portfolio of publicly traded securities. I learned about shareholder action to engage corporate boards for cultural change. And in that course, I learned about creative impact investments that generate both a financial return and social good. I was absolutely fascinated. In all my financial and capital markets courses at Harvard from ‘94 to ’98, I had never once been exposed to the practice of social investing. Again, these classes lacked purpose or meaning. With SRI, which we now call faith driven investing, finance suddenly became imbued with deep significance because I began to see how the allocation of capital impacts the lives of the neighbors we’re called to love. With faith driven investing, I began to see how finance could be an avenue to fulfilling God’s great commandments to love Him by honoring Him with the stewardship of His talents and loving others, by taking care not to profit at their expense.

Luke Roush: Maybe just to pause there for a comment. Actually, so that concept that you just articulated is not a new idea today, but back in, you know, late summer of 2001, that was kind of a novel idea. Maybe just speak a little bit about the relationship that you have with one professor who kind of helped you get focused on this and helped you to contextualize some of the research that you did. I’d love to just have you pause for a moment and actually just speak about that discovery process, where your research led you in terms of conclusions, and how all those things tied together.

Mary Naber: Okay. So, the professor—the Director of Corporate Ethics at Harvard Divinity School—her name is Dr. Marcy Murninghan. And she was just a great inspiration and was the one to suggest to me when I was looking for a senior research thesis that I go to a think tank I really admire and respect and see what research they needed done. I wouldn’t say that apart from the academic guidance, that we got deep into the spiritual imperative, that came maybe a couple of years later. But she provided just that tremendous piece of advice for any senior looking to do a thesis or graduate student doing a dissertation to go out and find what research needs to be done. It turns out I had been interning—I interned that summer before my senior year—at a company called KLD. KLD – acronym for Kinder, Lydenberg and Domini. They were the leading research firm providing the social research database—it’s called the Socrates database—to institutional investors, tracking which companies were in industries of concern. And they were absolutely the leaders. They were located in Harvard Square, just a bike ride from Lowell House where I lived. That was a fantastic benefit. And speaking of Merrill, this was now ‘96/‘97. Merrill had hired KLD to monitor one of their first ethical funds, and one of my roles was doing a deep dive in the due diligence of those underlying holdings to ensure that nothing had changed at those companies to bring any of those holdings into question. So, thinking through my thesis, my senior year…

Luke Roush: Sorry, who were the clients that you were representing as you were kind of asking these questions? Like, who cared? Like, who are you ultimately working for here?

Mary Naber: Oh, when I was working at KLD?

Luke Roush: Well like yeah, trying to assess whether there were problematic things or not in different companies. Who cared about that?

Mary Naber: Right. So well Merrill Lynch had established this fund and they had designed the parameters. And, if my recollection is correct, I am pretty confident they were the traditional socially responsible screens: tobacco, gambling, alcohol, military and nuclear power. And so this fund had those specific securities that did, in fact, meet those screens—they were not restricted due to those screens. And yet, because companies can always merge or buy new subsidiaries, it’s always good to stay on top of, you know, the research related to what’s going on in those individual companies. And that’s what I got to do. And that relationship was amazing. I had an opportunity in my senior year to speak with the Director of Research at KLD, Dr. Steve Lydenberg, and I said, “Well, what research do you need done?” And he said, “Well, we have a lot of Catholic clientele. We could use some research on what issues are of concern to them.” And so that was really the genesis of my senior research thesis, which was developing a methodology and profile of the Catholic investor. And of course, then doing the research to see how investing with Catholic principles would impact returns. 

And in the late nineties Catholics were a great case study. Their “sin stock” concerns bridged the traditional social screens of tobacco and gambling, with the emerging social conservative pro-life concerns of abortion and pornography. Plus, at the time, and still, I’d say Catholics had a very rich history of social faith driven investing, especially at the institutional level. 

Nuns, of course, were very active in shareholder engagement, and screening was utilized at Catholic hospitals, universities and other institutions.

In 1991, Pope John Paul II wrote in his encyclical letter: “The decision to invest in one place rather than another, in one productive sector rather than another, is always a moral and cultural choice.” 

Also in the early 1990s, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops had released the NCCB/USC Socially Responsible Investment Guidelines that served as a guide for Catholic investors, and my research, which I supplemented through extensive interviews with U.S. bishops and other Catholic finance leaders and a group of Jesuits in Harvard. I invited myself to their place for dinner. But 90 percent of my work…

Henry Kaestner: That’s awesome. I love that. So, I had a Jesuit high school. I love the Jesuits and I love the fact that a co-ed at Harvard decided “I’m going to go ahead and crash the Jesuits’ dinner party.”

Mary Naber: Yes, it’s one of my highlights, and I have many.

Henry Kaestner: How do they tell you so you go ahead, you’ve got a—you’ve got a head of steam about how you’re thinking about all this. The Pope is coming out with an encyclical, and a bunch of guys are sitting around just trying to meditate and pray, and then you challenge them with this. How did they respond?

Mary Naber: I found them to be very receptive, very kind. I really enjoyed so deeply those connections I was able to make in the context of interviews. I got to interview some incredible Bishops who had written some incredible encyclical letters, one called “Economic Justice For All”. And what I found actually and discovered in the context of that research— was that these guidelines that were written in the early 90s, didn’t include a screen for adult entertainment or pornography. It was, again, something corporations/publicly traded companies were getting more and more involved in. And I made a recommendation in my thesis, which I sent along to the framers of those Guidelines, that they needed to update their Guidelines. And a couple of years later, in fact, the NCCB/USCC Socially Responsible Investment Guidelines now includes adult entertainment/pornography as a screen for avoidance investing. So but again, it’s…

Henry Kaestner: It’s important work.

Mary Naber: Just my time with the Jesuits, all of those wonderful faithful Catholics that I got to interview, I’m just so thankful. I’ll throw in one other quick story about a Catholic who had great input, and that was my senior thesis advisor. So it was suggested to me when I was looking for a thesis advisor that I go over to Harvard Business School. There was an associate professor who was also known to be a practicing Catholic. His name was Professor Peter Tufano. And I was just so happy that he would be willing to take me on. One of the greatest honors at the end of my research, at the end of my senior year, he said, “You know, Mary, I think I learned more from this research project than you.” Of course, I’m sure he was just humoring me, but it was really a great honor. He went on to become Dean of HBS and Dean of Saïd Business School at Oxford and is now even today researching ESG adoption in corporate environments. So it’s fun to have just had the blessing of those relationships in some of the early days, and I am thankful to God for that.

Henry Kaestner: What was your main discovery?

Mary Naber: Oh, sure! It was incredible. This is just some of the best news. Investing with ethical, religious, Christian, Catholic principles will not result in an adverse impact on financial performance. 

Henry Kaestner: That’s pretty important.

Mary Naber: I mean, it was just super exciting. I basically, after developing that methodology, built portfolios based on different levels of stringency from the Catholic principles, and none of those portfolios showed a statistically significant difference. That is, that the difference could not be explained otherwise by chance. The same results came about based on a multivariable regression analysis. And you know, what was very interesting about the thesis itself is that I had to, of course, for those who do senior theses, I had to do a multi-page literature review. It’s required that the student go look at all the research that’s ever been done so as not to replicate previous research. So, super blessed, I’m at KLD, the Director of Research had those old places where we used to keep files, file cabinets, and just pages and pages and pages of papers and papers and papers. And I supplemented that with research at HBS and really found conclusively, as I said before, that 95 percent of the empirical studies conclusively demonstrate even back then in the late nineties and still today, no adverse impact on financial performance. So that was the empirical research that my research validated. And I mean, what was neat is that my research was published in the Journal of Investing in Winter of 2001. It was the first published academic paper to integrate investing and faith. And it was the first to look at how the exclusion of social conservative concerns of abortion and pornography would impact returns. All the other papers had previously only looked at those traditional social concerns. So we knew and could discover, empirically, no cost. Historically, we had over a decade of SRI funds and indices like the DSI, Domini Social Index, demonstrating not a statistically significant difference in performance. I have an argument that theoretically even—the theory—economic theory supports the idea that we will not lose unnecessarily in our financial return. So I had another professor who was heading up kind of our little senior thesis tutorial class. He refused to sign off on my thesis. He refused to sign off on the topic. He would not approve it. And the reason, he said, “Is we don’—this isn’t a question. Ethical investing portfolio screening will not adversely impact your returns, and we know that.” He was relying on the efficient market hypothesis, which basically says that all known information, including SRI or ESG traits of a company are already priced in the stock. Hence, you know, no excess return or loss. Basically, he just said, “No, we know this isn’t a question. It won’t impact your returns.” The only way I got him to sign off on my thesis topic was by demonstrating to him back in the late 90’s, Wall Street Journal articles basically raising the question and asserting that SRI would adversely impact performance. That was the going belief back then, that was the belief that even some Christian investors had back then. But really, what my research showed is, you know, the other empirical research, the historical evidence, and the theoretical argument. Okay, one more—logic! With thousands of publicly traded companies to choose from… We can afford to be a little exclusive. 

So to me, if I may just jump, the exciting news related to the fact that there is no cost when it comes to portfolio screening—faith driven investing—in your public securities. And again, let’s not go overboard—like if you’re saying, “I’m only going to invest in this little segment of the market” yeah, maybe there will be an impact. We’re just speaking broadly. We can afford to avoid companies profiting from abortion, pornography, tobacco, gambling, casinos. There are enough companies to select from and be fully diversified. So the reason this is so exciting to me is we forget this… 

Sorry, one other point. We don’t really think of this anymore. I feel like it’s kind of taken for granted, and this is a good thing. Just this idea that it won’t impact your returns—or maybe some people out there who still think so… But the research really shows conclusively, I think the general public understanding is… No cost. 

So you think about generous giving, right? The offer, the offer is you’re giving up your worldly material wealth for future gain, for eternal reward. 

You know that could be crowns, right, we don’t even know what those true riches look like. I think when we gift to charity, we may, in fact—that eternal reward will probably be people who are saved, who have eternal life because of our giving. So the gift that God has before us, it’s a tradeoff, it’s a lovely tradeoff. We give up, you know, cash in our account. We give, you know, if you’re wisely using a National Christian Foundation donor advised fund, you can actually wisely give shares of your company, shares of your stock. The bottom line is when we give, we’re giving worldly wealth. It goes to eternal kingdom purposes. So here is the proposition and faith driven investing, and it’s mind blowing to me. 

Henry Kaestner: Yes.

Mary Naber: That is, number one, at no financial cost, at no cost to your worldly wealth, you gain today. You get a free gain today. I put this in the Journal of Investing article back in 2001. It’s my very last paragraph. I don’t know how many people here know the phrase, “Pareto efficiency”.

Henry Kaestner: I don’t. I don’t and I bet many of our audience doesn’t.

Luke Roush: I do. And I’m really proud, it’s maybe the only phrase that I remember and I’m really glad to be able to say that I know something that Henry doesn’t, which doesn’t happen very often.

Henry Kaestner: Oh, it happens a lot. It happens a lot. What is the phrase? So, somebody is going to have to explain, if this following paragraph is predicated on you knowing the Pareto principle, if that’s indeed how you pronounce it. And maybe we’ll put Luke on the spot. What is it? What’s the Pareto principle?

Luke Roush: Why would I describe it, not when we have an expert on the thing and…

 Henry Kaestner: Haha, well played. 

Luke Roush: that would be…that would be…

Henry Kaestner: Yeah, that’s right. Who are we interviewing here? Mary, tell us before you tell about the last paragraph. What is the Pareto principle?

Mary Naber: Sure, it means an economic theory, an alteration in the allocation of resources is said to be Pareto efficient when it leaves at least one person better off and nobody worse off. 

Henry Kaestner: Oh, I like that. 

Mary Naber: So, in the very last paragraph of my Journal of Investing article, um, “Individuals and institutions can make a Pareto efficient move by investing with Catholic or other religious and ethical principles from the comparable return and the added utility and social benefit of a clean conscience.” So here’s the value proposition of faith driven investing: it’s that at no cost you, Henry or Luke, or anyone listening… At no cost, material or financial. When you choose to integrate your faith in your investments, you gain something amazing in your life today. And let’s go through the list: the joy and happiness and blessing that comes from seeking to honor God in all that we do; the benefits of a clean conscience; sleeping well at night; conversation at a cocktail party. How about a chance to hang out with these very fun gentlemen at FDI conferences, and get to know the rest of the FDI community? Like… 

Henry Kaestner: What a deal!

Mary Naber: I mean, and that’s what we would call a Pareto efficient move.

Henry Kaestner: I love it. So, OK, I want to I want to throw that on its head just slightly. And also the ability to get to know more Jesuit priests and to break bread with them. So this is fascinating. 

So a lot of times we talk about standing on the shoulders of people who’ve gone before us, and you will talk about Count Sivendorph and the Moravians, we’ll talk about the Guinness family. There are a bunch of different great examples, but your academic research on this is a big deal. It’s a big deal. It was early on. I don’t think that people I know know there’s an article in Christianity Today, there’s the Journal of Investing, and I don’t think that enough people really appreciate, on one hand, the simplicity of what you just mentioned in that last paragraph, but also the complexity of a lot of rigorous academic research that went behind finding this simple conclusion. And it makes it that much more credible. 

But one of the things that undergirds this is this kind of portfolio diversification theory that if you’ve got twenty thousand different issues to be able to pull from, if you just exclude eight, is that really going to impact your returns or if you’re going to exclude eight hundred, even—is that going to really impact your returns? Flip that on its head a little bit. And one of the premises that we have, and taking your work and trying to build on it a bit, is that there are some amount of companies that instead of just matching the market return, there’s some amount of companies that, because they employ biblical values, will succeed, not at the expense of them, but because of them that they may even do better. And I think it would be hard for us on this podcast to presume that the Holy Spirit advantage is worth one hundred twenty five basis points or two hundred and fifty or something like that. But if we go ahead and we actually come up with a more of a narrow lens and say through some of our research, we found two hundred—two hundred and twenty five or so—Christian led, faith driven CEOs of publicly traded companies. And that includes big companies like Cisco with Pat Gelsinger and Intel with Chuck Robbins and in smaller companies as well. Do you know of any researcher? What are your thoughts there? You’re deeply thoughtful about what we don’t have to give anything up, so therefore it’d be a great deal. But what if we take that logic the next step and say, “Well, if we have a faith driven founder who, when Fortune or Forbes interviews them, might be able to point to their Christian faith as being material to how they lead? Do you expect that you’ll find a fall-off in return? How do you even process that?

Mary Naber: Oh, absolutely. So, you know what’s so interesting that was discovered in my research and Dr. Lloyd Kurtz, he has the website, sristudies.org, hundreds and hundreds of papers and empirical papers. And so on the number one point: as long as you’re diversified, your returns shouldn’t sacrifice in financial performance. I talked about the theoretical argument. Well, the practical realities is that there can be—if you are focused in the market, you can find features. In my research, it was investing in employee relations and investing in community development—that actually resulted in an abnormal excess return. Okay. And Lloyd Kurtz said he found this as well. He was working with some investment firms to exploit this, and I think the general idea is it may now be completely exploited through ESG. But absolutely, I completely concur that there’s no reason why if you’re not… I mean, if we just look at how God has blessed so many of those in the FDI community doing this work, it’s abnormal outperformance… But I’m always careful, right, past performance is no indication of future success. And you know, a number two, you want to avoid kind of the prosperity gospel stuff. 

But at the end of the day, I do believe, and I have seen, even in my own client portfolios, that that faithfulness…? God is amazing and He does things that just kind of defy anything we could be talking about in economic theory. And so I just, I have seen that, I give God the glory for it. So I absolutely agree that excess abnormal return and opportunities to exploit those still exist in parts of the market, and also God’s provision. So, yeah.

Henry Kaestner: So I like that. You know that past performance is no indication of—say it again. Past performance is no indication of future performance, right? Or past results…. And yet scripture does tell us some things about financial return, laying up treasures in heaven. 

Mary Naber: Oh, yes.

Henry Kaestner: We know that when you talked about it before, about the Parable of the Mustard Seed. There’s some great biblical examples of being faithful and how that actually does deliver great investment returns. 

And maybe, as we believe, we believe that you may find some alpha in financial markets in a way that the secular world can look at it. But we know undisputedly that when we are able to think differently, we may even get a return this 30, 60 or 100 times fold if we’re not primarily focused on the worries of the world and the deceitfulness of riches, right?

Mary Naber: Absolutely, yes. And that was the other benefit to the whole Pareto efficient proposal here that at no cost, and perhaps as you’ve suggested, perhaps abnormal outperformance and excess alpha, giving that exchange of worldly wealth, we get benefit today. Wait, hang on! Benefit tomorrow in God’s Kingdom. In Luke 16:11, If you have not been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will trust you with true riches? And so, it’s so exciting—faith driven investing—assists us in being trustworthy in handling worldly wealth so that by His grace, our God may someday trust us with true riches. Now what is that great responsibility? Crowns? Treasures in heaven? He promises true riches and treasures in heaven and just to think, I mean, we start with that 10 percent and we’re encouraged to go 20-40-60% giving. Why would we leave resources that God has entrusted to us off the table when we can be investing those into eternal Kingdom purposes, to be honoring Him with all that He’s entrusted to us? And I mean, in addition to loving Him, loving our neighbor by avoiding investment in companies that hurt or harm or again prey on their addictions and weaknesses. Wait, it’s also an act of evangelism. Because if we as Christians invest no differently than the world, how then is Jesus so enticing? And so even in our day to day, I believe that we are taking action that may perk the interest. I mean, certainly, I have quite a number of clients who aren’t followers of Jesus. But you know, like you were saying earlier—those kinds of conversations, those type of relationships that this type of work allows, there are opportunities to share Jesus’ love, and share the story of His means of salvation. So to me again, this whole message of faith driven investing, that you’re getting all these extra benefits at no cost is, I think, one of those stories that not a lot of people are thinking about, or even as you suggest and I concur, the possibility of that excess alpha. And that, by the way, I will celebrate our Lord Jesus who has brought that about. I think we see that when we look at the performance of the different managers involved in this movement.

Luke Roush: One of the things we always like to ask, folks, is what God has been teaching them lately and it doesn’t need to be like this morning or last night, but more just how has God been speaking to you lately, Mary, in terms of your work or, you know, things in your community all to just get what’s on your heart.

Mary Naber: Just another thought I had when I was thinking through this, this particular podcast—you’re talking about that 10-20 percent to give. Let’s not leave 40 or 50 that we invest or save or spend on the table. And I also believe if we can through when we pay our taxes, do we say a prayer that God would use those resources and do something to redeem them? Right. So we can pray over all aspects and consider God in all aspects of everything He has entrusted us.

But another kind of thought I’ve been reflecting on is this idea that I think—consistently through Scripture and during the FDI talk, I had this opportunity to kind of share John Wesley’s sermon, “The Use of Money: Gain All You Can”, and that would always be quoted to me “gain all you can” as though as long as you’re gaining all you can, it doesn’t matter that we care—so far as how the money is made—as long as you get all you can, right? No, no, no, no, absolutely. We absolutely have to think about the source of our wealth. And John Wesley goes on to say that, and Scripture goes on to say that. And I think my point here is that, I think scripture consistently suggests that if we have not taken consideration as to the source of our wealth, that even our generous giving may be in vain. 

Okay, that 10, 20 percent, you know, don’t be the believer who drops that off at church and then leave, because one of the Scriptures that moved me so deeply is that of Isaiah, in Isaiah 1, where he is prophesizing “Stop bringing meaningless offerings, your incense is an abomination; though you make many prayers, I will not listen. Your hands are covered in blood.”

Why would it make sense to us that God would ever want us to put before Him on the throne gifts made through ill-gotten gains? I wouldn’t be that interested either. And so why would we take the risk that that which we’re giving may be considered meaningless if we haven’t considered the source of our wealth?

Henry Kaestner: That’s a really important concept. That’s a really important concept because, you know, the traditional framework for a Christian, for many Christians, including myself to some extent, has been “I want to make as much money as I possibly can over here with my left hand, and then to the extent I understand the biblical message of generosity, I want to give away as much as I can over here. And what we’ve been talking about at faith driven investing of course, is that the very process of making the investments over here might accomplish the same ministry and missions goals we have over here. And you’re saying yes, but also that original framework we had may not have been as effective as even we thought at the time, which is “make as much money as we can, regardless of how we get those results, and therefore that giving, that generosity and that’s what really matters”. And you’re suggesting no, no, no, no. In the event that we get investment returns and investing in things that were Corbyn or just, you know, just difficult and messy,… I’m not a theologian, so I should know the Corbyn reference better. But if they’re invested through ill-gotten gain or things that were not holy in and of themselves, then that giving actually doesn’t glorify God in the way that maybe we had thought.

Mary Naber: Yes, you said it perfectly. Thank you. I completely concur. 

Henry Kaestner: You’re welcome. So the passage is from Isaiah?

Mary Naber: Isaiah 1:15, yes…

Henry Kaestner: Mary, this has been awesome.

Mary Naber: Oh, thank you. I’ve had so much fun. Thank you this opportunity.

Henry Kaestner: It’s infrequent that we find, you know, I think that we are all, including these podcast hosts, are starting to really think about it much more deeply and that God has done a work in all of our hearts. It’s clear that you’ve been thinking about this for a very long time, and I’m grateful for your work and I’m grateful that our listeners get a chance to hear how you put together these just awesome arguments that starts off with some of the basic things from game theory and Pascal’s Wager and just extend it through to what you do as a job in the financial markets and you bless us and thank you.

Luke Roush: And we got into Pareto efficiency, which is a first on the Faith Driven Investor podcast. A big win.

Henry Kaestner: Thank you for bailing Luke out.

Luke Roush: Hey, one last thing to wrap. So talk to us. Just one thing that God’s told you recently about your walk.

Mary Naber: So I would say I am a single working mom of three, and I have those days where I don’t get to spend time in the morning with the Lord. So I obviously think in a stewardship financial mindset, we always think first fruits in terms of our giving, and I just feel like He’s really imparting on me the importance of the first fruits of my time in my day. And I was deep i- the vision that He struck me with was not building the house on sand or rock, but me trying to walk on shifting sand. On those days, I haven’t built my day, my time, my meditation and prayer on Him that I’m literally like living in a little state of semi-anxiety. Not really. I’m not super anxious, but I mean, just off-kilter and on shifting sand. And yet those days when I get to spend that time with the Lord and get up a little early and it’s always suggested you grab your coffee—haha, just to wake up. To enjoy those times and start that day on the rock is like a night and day different experience, and I thank God for that. I thank God for how He shows up when we, not always, but you know, He will be there saying we might not always feel it, but He is there and that is something He continues to teach me.

Luke Roush: Grateful for that. Mary, appreciate you. Appreciate your groundbreaking research many, many years ago in an arena that has become, I think, more in vogue and more interesting and larger and yet you’re one of the first movers. So we’re grateful for your work in that regard and grateful for your friendship.

Henry Kaestner: Indeed.

Mary Naber: Oh, thank you. So all take care.

Episode 92 – God & Mammon with Andy Crouch

Subscribe to the Podcast:

Andy Crouch, best-selling author and a partner of theology and culture at Praxis, is a leading voice in the Faith Driven movement. Andy spoke at a recent Faith Driven Investor Conference on a topic that many faith driven investors are wrestling with regularly: God and money, we cannot serve both. How do we balance out Jesus’ teaching and our calling as Faith Driven Investors? Listen to what Andy had to say for some insights and inspiration.


Episode Transcript

Some listeners have found it helpful to have a transcription of the podcast. Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it. The FDI movement is a volunteer-led movement, and if you’d like to contribute by editing future transcripts, please email us.

Andy Crouch: I want to talk about two mysteries relating to Jesus most famous words about money. And of course, you know what they are. You cannot serve God, and most modern translations will say money. So the first mystery is why not? Why couldn’t you serve God and money each in their appropriate way, the way Jesus said you could God and Caesar. So Caesar’s, the pagan emperor of the Roman Empire, people pressed Jesus on the question of whether they should even pay taxes disease. Is there any says, well, render to Caesar what Caesar’s and render God wants God. So serve Caesar in a proper ways. Don’t serve Caesar the way you serve God. Don’t treat Caesar like a God. But you can serve Caesar in his appropriate way and serve God. Why does Jesus never say you cannot serve God and Caesar? But he does say you can’t serve God and money. And then what exactly does Jesus say? Because older translations have Jesus saying You cannot serve God and Mammon? What does that word doing there, and what would it mean that Jesus said, You cannot serve God, not just in money, but God and Mammon? So first question first, why? Why is money more powerful than Caesar? I want us to justice because money, especially in large quantities, gives you a power that Caesar does not have. What is money? You learned it in economics. It’s a medium of exchange, a unit of account and a store of value. And this means that money is fungible, countable, storable power. Power, the ability to get things done in the world. The ability to get what you want in the world. The ability to get that and get things done, perhaps even without other people wanting that to get done. That’s power and money gives you a form of power that’s fungible, countable and storable. So fungible it can be exchanged for other things. So this this obviously is one of the key things about money. It’s actually a very little use all by itself, but you can turn it into whatever you want. Not true of most forms of power, including Caesar’s. Caesar has a great deal of power as the Lord of the Roman Empire, but he can only exercise his power in that office in that land. He’s not the emperor of China. He can’t just arbitrarily decide he wants something totally different or wants to exercise his power in somewhere totally different. His power has to be used in a particular context because most power is contextual, but money allows you to use power wherever you want anywhere that legal tender is accepted. You can exchange it into anything. That’s power that Caesar doesn’t know, at least doesn’t know because of his role as emperor, then it’s accountable. You know how much you have of it, and this is definitely not true of most kinds of power. How much power exactly does the CEO of a company have? Well, certainly some. But if you’ve ever been in that role, you know, it’s hard to know exactly how much you have. There’s certainly no way to count it, but you can measure money, you can count money. You can know how much is on your balance sheet, how much is available to spend, and you can’t really do that with power. There’s an uncertainty to other kinds of power, but not with the kind of power that we call money. And maybe most powerfully, you can store it. It’s storable, a store of value. You can save it for later. And most kinds of power have to be exercised now at the moment that you have it because you may not have it later or it may not be given, except in a given moment. I’m I have a certain amount power as speaker at FDE. I’ve got this moment. I’ve got the power to speak to you right now, but I can’t save it for next month or next year. I’ve got to use it now. But if I have money at a time of my choosing, I imagine at least I can use it. And all of these kinds of power are kind of Caesar doesn’t have. And all of them add up to a power that is not dependent. There is no dependance in the power of money in the way there is in most other forms of power, even political and military power. Caesar only had his role because he was the adopted or sometimes biological son of a powerful man. It was a relationship that gave him power. Even in our modern democracies, people get power through the consent of the governed. But if you have enough money, the honest truth is you can get whatever done you want without anyone really having to know or care or even validate who you are because money talks without you having to be a person, it’s impersonal power. This is a power greater than any other in the world. And if you have it or had it or can imagine having it, why would you need God? Who needs God? When you can get what you want, whatever you want, when you want it, when you know how much you have, you can store it and you don’t have to be any particular kind of person to get what you want. Who any God? When you add money. So this is the first reason you can’t serve it, because this is a the most direct rival to God in human affairs. And the reason people come to you and the reason you and I live with anxieties about money with hopes for money is because of the kind of power we imagine that will give us. But there’s also a deeper thing going on, and it gets to the word that Jesus used. Jesus was speaking Aramaic the way he probably did his whole life. His biographers, the gospel writers, translate his words into Greek, and then we translate in case of English speakers into English so we can understand. But every once in a while, the Gospels will leave an Aramaic word untranslated, and they do so in this case. They write down in Greek, you shall not. You cannot serve God, and they just leave it on translate mammon. It’s a Semitic word that roughly means money or assets held in trust or the create trust. Why is why do they not translate this word? Well, what kinds of words do we not translate the most common kind of word? We don’t translate our names. You don’t translate a name from one language, although you just transliteration that name. And that’s what the gospel writers do here. And the early church concluded that the reason they did this is they understand they understood something that Jesus was saying, which is that we’re not talking about an ordinary noun here. We’re not talking about even just a principle or an idea. We’re talking about a quasi personal name, mobile power in human affairs that intends something that has a will in the world that is opposed to the will of God. And the ordinary way we talk about this ordinary, extraordinary way is that we are talking about a demonic power. The early church concluded that Mammon was not just an idea or a principle, but the name of a being in service of the enemy of all that is good. The opponent of all of God’s works in the world that we sometimes call Satan or the devil. That Mammon is this demonic force at work in history with a kind of quasi personal ability to whisper and speak to human beings and to arrange and distort human affairs in a particular direction. And what is it that man and wants to get done in the world wants the opposite of what God wants. God has made this good, beautiful, abundant material world. He fills it with persons. He says this world is already very good, but now I want you to feel the Earth multiply and bring forth all the possibility and all the value out of the world. As the world is filled with persons that will become full of the knowledge and love of God and the knowledge and love of one another, and in some ways, the knowledge and love of the world itself. While Mammon being aligned with the demonic, being part of the demonic forces that work in history hates all of these things. Of course it hates God. It wants us never to depend on God. Mammon hates creation itself, doesn’t like the material. World wants an immaterial world that’s purely spirit. And think about how money functions as a as as it gets more advanced, it becomes less and less metaphysical. We don’t carry around gold anymore. We just account in our minds the imagination of how much we have. And Mammon hates persons. It wants you to operate impersonally. It actually wants to turn persons into things. In fact, one mammon really gets its grip into a human society as it had gotten its grip into the Roman Empire as it got its grip into capitalism that built our western world. The result is treating persons like things, treating persons impersonally. This is what slavery is. It’s treating a person like property. It’s treating a person like a thing. And while God wants the world to be filled with persons so that the whole world will be known and loved and God will be known and loved and everything Mammon wants to empty the world of persons want Mammon wants everything to be impersonal so that there’s no one and nothing. No one left only things and ultimately not even material things, just an immaterial world that is devoted to pure power without dependance. You cannot serve a demon that wants to destroy a person’s relationships creation itself. And also serve the true God who wants to reunite persons, restore relationships and liberate creation from its bondage to decay. You cannot serve God and Mammon and this demonic power called Mammon. Besides our world, our modern world in an absolutely unique way in history. How can you doubt this is the principle that is driving human events in a way that wasn’t even true in Jesus Day wasn’t even true a thousand years ago, but is incredibly true today. You cannot serve God and Mammon. And so I’ve started to think that what’s Faith Driven Investor? I mean, investing is about the deployment of many kinds of resources, but especially financial ones, especially in our modern world. Money based resources. Is our job just to sort of do that with Christian principles, kind of, you know, obviously not violate Christian principles, but just do things with money in the world and maybe make money in Christian ways in the world. I think that is not nearly deep enough for what we’re actually called to do. We are actually here insofar as we are people who operate proximate to money and the whisperings and power of Mammon to take back territory from this demonic power and from these false promises of fungible, storable, accountable power. And reclaim territory for the relational creation loving God, who has placed us here to tend his world. So we’re going to do that. We’re gonna need to do two kinds of things. We’re going to need to have some detox moves and some creative moves or creative resistance, let’s say, to the empire moment. The first thing we’re going to have to do is just thoroughly dethrone Mammon and this imagination of money as power, without relationship abundance, without dependance, we’re going to have to dethrone that from our lives. So just two quick detox ideas that I think all of us need to take super seriously. The basic way to dethrone money and mammon is generosity. It’s giving because most ways we use money give us control and safety, but giving releases control by definition, when you give you no longer have control giving is risky. By definition, when you give, you’re giving up some store of value. You could have held on for some other use. And you’re just you’re just saying, I release it. It is the basic detox activity. The Christian Church has often taught a kind of principle of tithing on income, and I think that’s a really good thing, though I think many of us should probably aim for a higher percentage than ten. I just want to say what what has been absolutely transforming for my own life and our family in the last 10 years is twice now we have felt God leading us to tithes, not on our income, which we continue to do and a graduated way, but to tithe on our assets. So we calculate our net worth, all the things that are entrusted to us that we know how to value, and we find a way to liquidate 10 percent of that and give it away to the purposes of God’s kingdom and the good of our neighbors. I will tell you, I don’t know if you’ve ever tried this. If you try it first, it is incredibly hard to pull the trigger in that way. It feels really risky in a way that tithing on your income doesn’t because you can’t know that income is coming in. But this store of assets I have I mean, this is my store for the future. This is my promise of security for the future of options, for the future. And 10 percent is enough to hurt, at least for us. And once you do it, the joy and freedom you feel with relation to money is just unbelievable. It has been the thing that has just truly emptied me, especially having done it twice now in the last 10 years, just emptied me of the fear and love of money as near as I can tell, and my life is just gone. It’s just not part of my anxieties. And instead, I’m joyfully anticipating the next time I got to give away this level at this level in my life. The second detox was so generosity is the first. The second would be something I’m not really going to model here so directly, but it’s transparency. If we were together in person and I do this with many, many groups, have you been part of it? And I do it with many individuals. Rather than just talking about our family’s generosity in percentage terms, I would put up graphs and tables that have numbers on them. They show you how much we make in a given year our family, our household, how much we have been entrusted with our net worth, how that’s changed over time, how we’ve given, how we’ve spent, how we’ve saved all with real numbers. And when I do that consistently, people say I have never, ever heard a fellow Christian outside of some kind of confidential fiduciary relationship. Tell me how much they have and how much they make. Brothers, sisters, this should not be so this secrecy that we have around these numbers that are are the most immaterial thing about our lives is a sign that Mammon has its grip on us. And a very powerful way to detox is to open up your books. Not in a willy nilly way, and I don’t do it when it’s virtual and online because it’s severed from our relationship right now. But in any kind of relationship, I’m happy to share the complexities of what what God has entrusted to our family and how we’re trying to be faithful with it. Why is this not normal in the Christian community? Because we are trying to serve God and money. We’re trying to serve God in heaven at the same time. If we detox, if we are so lavishly generous for so openly transparent, what will we be free to do? What will become possible for us to strategies of creative resistance to man? And the first is we will be able in every transaction, every investment, every business decision to prioritize not money, but people to prioritize people, relationship with people, connection with people. The primary question we will ask about every deployment of our assets, including our spending as well as our saving and our investing and our giving is what will this do to strengthen relationship, to create capacity of love and dignity and respect for other people so that we can all do in the world what we were made to do? Only those who are free of mammon can realize that every transaction is actually an opportunity for love, to grow, for love, to be expressed in the world and a secondary byproduct is whatever accounting we may make of. The value that we can trust will be created as we operate a loving and people prioritizing where a person prioritizing where in the world. And then the second strategy of creative resistance to Amen, amen is that we can learn to be just ridiculously patient, ridiculously patient, ridiculous. That is to mammon. Because Mammon is in a hurry. Mammon wants you to make more of that money. Fast Mammon wants you to move so fast you don’t notice the people you’re running over to make it. And we learn from our Lord Jesus, and we learned from God’s own way with his creation that there’s this incredible divine patience that’s available to us. We are not in a hurry, so we will think less and less about IRR, more and more about what you know, some people call MLA multiples on investment. God is in the world. God wants us to be in the world to create multiples on investment, for sure. But our timing, how fast the velocity of money that’s ultimately up to God. That’s not the most important, not the most important thing. And this will lead us to have a thousand generation vision for our lives. If you give yourselves over to madmen, give yourself over to mama and you act and all the exploitive ways that madmen would have you act in order to get more of that countable, storable fungible power. You will do a lot of damage, but we know exactly. Or we know, according to God, how long that damage will last. God says if you enter into that kind of iniquity and mammon leads us to iniquity, it will do damage unto the third and fourth generation. This is Deuteronomy five nine. But the interesting thing is, even if you operate very ethically in the way that we’re taught to in modern investment in business, the truth is that the results financial and otherwise of of even our best investments, even our best enterprise building also probably will last about three or four generations. Honestly, most family wealth is kind of exhausted after three or four generations deluded. Most businesses don’t last more than that. Most of the work you and I do in our daily work, let alone the financial investments we place. I mean, realistically, it’s only going to last three or four generations. Picard says to those who love me and keep my commands and walking my way, I visit blessing to the thousandth generation. That is not going to be measured primarily in any kind of financial return that is measured in the flourishing of persons in the transmission of a love in the creation of redemptive possibility in the world. And it’s only available when we are completely serving God. We’ve completely detoxed from serving money. Any use of money is simply to serve this God on on whom we are completely dependent. Can we do that? Can we live in this world that mammon rules in a totally different way? Can we totally dethrone its power from our lives so that all of our workers, investors and spenders and savers and givers? Is devoted to God and God’s ways, prioritizing people. Pursuing patients, it’s as easy as a camel going through the eye of a needle, right with human beings, it’s impossible. But with God, all things are possible. Thanks.

Episode 93 – Sparking Global Change Through Catalytic Capital with Tsitsi Masiyiwa

Subscribe to the Podcast:

“How are we using the platform that God has given us to influence decision-makers and our communities to do good?” This is the question that drives Tsitsi Masiyiwa. One answer is by utilizing catalytic capital—a patient, flexible, risk-tolerant form of financing. Sometimes it accepts lower returns to accommodate the economics of high-impact organizations that are profitable but not profit-maximizing, whether due to an early stage of business development, tough markets, or a focus on impoverished populations. Tsitsi draws on her years of experience in philanthropy and as a social entrepreneur to share how Faith Driven Investors can leverage their capital to solve global challenges.


Episode Transcript

Some listeners have found it helpful to have a transcription of the podcast. Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it. The FDI movement is a volunteer-led movement, and if you’d like to contribute by editing future transcripts, please email us.

Jacktone: Faith Driven Entrepreneur Africa spotlights the stories across the continent, which is why you will mostly hear distinctively African stories on this podcast. But we are also part of a global network, so we’ll mix in some of the best stories from around the world to hear what God is doing in other areas as well. Today’s episode with Tsitsi Masiyiwa, what was originally recorded on the Faith Driven Investor podcast, and we are excited to share her story with you. Tsitsi is a philanthropist and social entrepreneur, she is executive chair and co-founder of Higher Life Foundation, whose primary goal is to invest in human capital development to thriving individuals, communities and sustainable livelihoods. Her work has garnered global recognition. She has received honorary doctorate degrees from Morehouse University in Atlanta, Georgia, and Africa University in Mutara, Zimbabwe, as well as the prestigious Champions for Change Award for leadership from the International Center for Research on Women. I. C. R. W. More recently, Tsitsi has pioneered impact investing in Africa through the establishment of Delta Philanthropies in 2017, which seeks to unlock and catalyze innovative solutions to the elimination of poverty by convening strategic partnerships and incubating new development models. We are excited to share her story.

Henry Kaestner: Welcome back to the Faith Driven Investor Podcast Special International Edition today with a special International Edition co-host, Reuben Coulter. Welcome to the program.

Reuben Coulter: Thank you. Delighted to be with you Henry.

Henry Kaestner: Reuben, you and I have known each other for years, and you’ve been the director of international strategy here and faith driven for what, about a year now? Something like that. And we’ve talked about all sorts of different really cool things going on in the world and projects that we get a chance to work on together as we look to encourage a global movement behind Faith Driven Entrepreneur and Faith Driven Investor, which is the topic we’re talking about today. And yet most of our listeners probably don’t know who you are. So, Reuben, who are you? Where do you come from?

Reuben Coulter: Well, as you may hear by my accent, I’m originally from Ireland, but based in Bristol in the U.K. and I’m married to a wonderful Polish lady. And we have two children, five years old and a three years old, the first born in Switzerland and the second born in Kenya. So we’re a truly international family, and I guess we’ve been called by God all over the world to serve him. I originally started off really wanting to understand how do we tackle poverty and help alleviate poverty around the world. And more recently, I realized that the question needs to be changed and needs to be flipped. How do we create prosperity and how do we help communities flourish? And so that’s taken me from working in the refugee camps in Darfur and Liberia for many years as a public health specialist. Then to the corridors of power at the World Economic Forum, where I curated the Davos event and the Africa Summit, and worked with business leaders and governments, helping them think through inclusive economic policies. More recently, I’ve become passionate about the role that entrepreneurs can play and how they are pioneers and changemakers and at the forefront of really tackling some of the big problems in our world. And some of the most incredible entrepreneurs I’ve met are from the continent of Africa, from Kenya, from Zimbabwe, from Nigeria. And they’re basically there isn’t a legacy infrastructure. And so they’ve had to build things from scratch in the area of financial technology, in agriculture, in health care. And it’s been just so exciting to be on that journey together with you. Henry over the past year.

Henry Kaestner: It has been and as I’m listening to you, it’s strange, of course, that we’ve waited a whole year to have you talk about it, and yet you’ve been behind the scenes. You’ve been helping us put together guests. And I’m so encouraged about doing this our first time, and I look forward to doing many more. And for this first time, we’ve got a very special guest that you have known now for a while and admired and had known that she would be a perfect guest for the podcast. And I’m hoping that you can introduce Tsitsi to us help us to understand what about her story really brought you in and then of course, we’ll ask her to tell her story. But Reuben, why don’t you introduce our guest and then I’ll ask her some questions and and then we’ll have a good conversation today about the balance between giving and investing and how to think about sub-Saharan Africa as a Faith Driven Investor.

Reuben Coulter: Yes, I’m so delighted to have Tsitsi Masiyiwa with us today. She’s an African philanthropist and a social entrepreneur and she’s a pioneer. She is someone who has been working for decades as the executive chair and co-founder of the Higher Life Foundation, whose mission is to build thriving individuals, communities and sustainable livelihoods. And with a particular focus on her home country of Zimbabwe. I had the privilege of meeting Tsitsi and her husband Strive at a conference a number of years ago where thought leaders in the UK came together to think about how do we use our talents for the common good? And the reference for that conference was the small group at the Clapham Circle who met a few hundred years ago in this little suburb of London, headed by William Wilberforce and many others. And they said, How do we use our influence, our gifts to change slavery, change the labor laws in the country, and bring about what we now understand as reformation during the Victorian era. And that conference was asking how do we do the same? And Tsitsi has been asking these questions for both our home country and of course the continent of Africa. Tsitsi is also a founding board member and the chair of the Africa Philanthropy Forum, as she’s the trustee of the Legatum Institute, the End Fund, UNICEF’s Gender Unlimited Initiative. And on the boards of many other organizations, the list goes on. And we’re just delighted to have you today to share a little bit about your story and your journey, both on the philanthropic side and on the impact investing sides.

Henry Kaestner: Indeed. Indeed, that’s an incredible background with amazing depth. And yet Tsitsi you have not yet been on the Faith Driven Investor podcast.

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: No, never.

Henry Kaestner: Never. We’re humbled and honored that you’re with us. You’ve got an incredible life story. Give us an overview of that journey. Who are you and where do you come from? Please.

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: So I am a Zimbabwean born in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe is a beautiful little country in southern Africa, population 15 million, very tiny GDP in comparison to the United States, around 21 billion. 70% of our population lives in the rural areas. And also it’s a very young population like the rest of the African continent. So 62% of the Zimbabwean population is under the age of 25. Primary economic activity is around agriculture, mining and a little bit of tourism. And with COVID, of course, tourism is not really making any headway. And I’m sure people have heard of one of the Seven Wonders of the World, the Victoria Falls. So that’s what Zimbabwe is famous for. In terms of me personally, you know, I trained in business not with any intention of going into business. And I also didn’t come from an entrepreneurial family background by any chance of the imagination. It was purely because I started studying agriculture and then discovered too much chemistry and moved to study business, which was a lot easier. But how we got into philanthropy was very much through the business door. So my husband used to be in construction buildings and his main customer was the government. And he decided after having come across an exciting new technology called mobile telephone technology, decided to set up mobile network service in Zimbabwe. So he applied for a license and the government said no private citizens cannot carry communication on behalf of the government and the public because of this sensitivity of information. And when he looked at the Constitution, what he read was that everybody had the right to access to information. So he decided to take the issue to court because he felt that the position the government had taken was contrary to our constitutional rights. And of course, I asked him he wasn’t a believer. I was a Christian then. And I looked at him and I said, Do you want to sue the government? He said, Yes. I said, Well, I have faith, and if it were me, I wouldn’t do that. What’s the basis of your confidence? He said, No, no, no. It’s a very straightforward case. I would take them to court. It will take three or four months after that will be done. And I would have my business. I believed him. And guess what? It turned out to be like a five years legal battle where we ended up literally losing everything we had. But in the process during that period, Zimbabwe was going through a pandemic, just like we’re going through a pandemic right now, and it was HIV and AIDS. And when I saw just firstly members of my own family die, I had an aunt who lost eight children from HIV and AIDS. And these are people I loved that I grew up with. And I began to question myself as a believer that what can I do? What role can I play? And it was in the process of that. Plus I was going to taking the government to court and ending up losing literally everything we had that I began to ask God, what is the purpose? What is my purpose? And if we went to have a business, what would we do with the money? Because. You can only sleep in one bed, drive one car, live in one house. So for all the pain and suffering. What was it all about? And I connected the dots between the terrible, heart wrenching experience I was going through and seeing communities just decimated by HIV and AIDS. And then also that opportunity, that intersection was about. Use the resources that you have to do what you can. And for Strive and I an obvious choice on how we could play a role in alleviating the suffering was to go into philanthropy and use our resources to give scholarships to orphaned children. So in a nutshell, that’s how we started the business and how we went into philanthropy.

Henry Kaestner: So this is no small business that you all have started. It’s got some level scale. Most of our audience are entrepreneurs and investors. Give us a concept to think about a business in Zimbabwe. Most people will have an image in their head. And yet what God has done through you all is something altogether different, a greater scale. Tell us about the business and what Econet Global has become.

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: Sure. So when we started, you know, we thought we’ll probably get 100,000 customers and live happily ever after. Well, as you know, that technology just opens amazing doors for development on the African continent. But in terms of our business in Zimbabwe grew from literally 0 to 100000 customers and over a period of time to 11 million customers. So currently, you know, we are the biggest MNO or mobile network operator in Zimbabwe. But we also saw opportunity so around early 2000. My husband left Zimbabwe and decided to move to South Africa so that we could explore new opportunities in South Africa. And that led us to begin to build the business. And we expanded from South Africa to the UK and then built a footprint on the African continent. So currently we are in more than 19 African countries. The business has since gone beyond mobile telephony to building fiber so millions of Africans can have access to the Internet. So we have built undersea cables, we have built on land cables, and we’ve really opened up Internet access into areas that honestly, there was just no way of people communicating from village to village or town to town. So it’s been incredibly fulfilling as entrepreneurs and also as believers to just see communities that would have no access to the Internet being used to open up these countries and build infrastructure. From DRC, Congo to Zambia to South Africa to Kenya, you know, the list goes on. We’ve actually built a connection from literally from Cape to Cairo. Yeah. So it’s an incredible journey.

Henry Kaestner: That’s incredible. And I recently saw a map of Africa and saw the United States in it, India in it, China in it, Africa. So when you’re going from Cape Town to Cairo, you’re not talking about a small area. There’s a lot of customers. It’s a lot of land. Tell us a bit about how your faith impacts the business you run and how you’re able to do business as you’re guided by your faith. That might be different than others that are in the same marketplace.

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: So I think right from the beginning, for me, it was important to be very transparent about my faith. So when we started our foundation, we just openly said it’s a faith based foundation. And we also decided not to really look for funding from anybody so that we would remain true to our values, our mission, our purpose and our vision. So faith is central to what we do. We hire stuff that’s come from all different religious beliefs. We have men who are not believers, who are not Christians, etc. but they come into the business and they come into the foundation knowing what our beliefs are, because that really informs the way we make decisions in partnerships, the way we make decisions in investments, and also the culture in the organization. So faith has been a central part of who we are and of what we do. And I think what has helped is just being very, you know, not everybody is able to do it, but for us, it’s just been very easy to be very open and transparent about it and and to talk about it openly here.

Henry Kaestner: So you and Strive have this incredible platform and influence because of the size and scale of the success that God is giving you. You’ve been labeled Africa’s power couple. How do you steward that influence and blessing?

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: Well, you know, thank goodness. You know, we have the Bible to build context on what power is and the ways things could get very complicated. So when people say power couple, for me it is more about how are we using the platforms that God has given us to be able to influence decision makers to do good and also to influence our communities that we are very heavily embedded in. Our philanthropic work is we implement all our projects. So we are very embedded in the communities that we work in. So in that respect, I think we are very much, let me tell you, rely on the power of the Holy Spirit more than any other power. It’s given us just the ability to be able to understand other forms of power that either affect what we do political power. Because a lot of the work that we do involves governments, regulators and […]. So it’s understanding the different forms of power, but knowing the power that moves us and informs how we do our business, our investments and our philanthropy.

Reuben Coulter: I’d like to shift gears. As the name of this podcast implies in the conference. We’re mostly focused on investing. However, we realize that not all the world’s problems can be solved purely by investing. Some issues do require philanthropy, or sometimes we like to call us gospel catalytic giving. That might be whether it’s a humanitarian response or addressing basic needs. So I’d like to understand a little bit more about your foundation, Higher Life. You have this wonderful tagline, Investing in People for Africa’s Prosperity. Can you unpack a little bit of what you do?

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: So at Higher life, we do impact investment at different levels. So we do grantmaking and scholarships because of the type of communities that we are working with and the type of communities that we invest in. Our primary target groups are vulnerable communities and in particular orphans. So that has informed the manner in which we do our giving the communities from early childhood development level to primary school to high school to university to Ph.Ds. So because we are building human capital resource, we see that is our contribution to strengthening Africa’s ability to provide highly skilled and competent pool of human resources, plus also lifting levels of literacy, especially for those who are not able to really go beyond high school. So the investment has to be scholarships and grants in then comes to working with communities where sustainable livelihoods is. At the center of what we try to do is to provide grants, but also low interest or no interest loans in order to give our communities the opportunity to invest in their livelihoods, but in a way that honors their ability to contribute something, which is, you know, their labor, their efforts, their times, their skills, but also in a manner that doesn’t burden them by having to carry out loans. You know, so where it’s appropriate, we look at doing impact investment and giving out patient capital in order to strengthen sustainability in communities, so ability for the communities to improve livelihoods. We’ve also found it important for us to also partner with your big suppliers, where we’ve gone in to invest in businesses for profit so that they can increase their capacity to be able to provide goods and services to communities that would be unattractive for them if they did not access our type of patient capital or types of investments.

Reuben Coulter: So it’s going to say, let’s unpack each of those, because each of those is, as I know, a huge piece of work. And so I’d love to kind of understand a little bit better. So you talked about patient capital. So can you explain to us kind of what that looks like in practice? And yeah, how do you go about doing that?

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: So for Patient Capital, we’re looking at where we have given loans at very low interest rates. So initially, I’ll give you a specific example of investments we did. Our goal was to increase poultry production because the two companies we’re working with needed to build capacity. But the investment that they needed for them to build capacity to service your small buyer required funding that was fairly inexpensive and also that gave them a lot of leg room to be able to build on their cashflows and also profitability. So that’s the patient capital. So what we did, we invested in these two companies. They were able to increase their capacity. Number one, to train new smallholder farmers. That would then be given a batch of one day old chicks, look after them, raise them over a period of 8 to 12 weeks, and then be the supplier back to the company that we invested in. So it has worked very well. Because it allowed those companies, like I said, to consider investing in small holder farmers that they ordinarily would not consider or would be unattractive for them also to. It allowed the companies to go into areas where levels of poverty are very high, levels of rainfall are very low, and where economic activity is at a minimum. So communities were able to see income generating projects that actually made money and improved the livelihoods of those farmers who have participated in projects like that. So I’m very excited in that. It’s an area we are expanding and in the next season we are hoping to recruit a lot more farmers. We also, if I can also just add one other project which also excites me. So there is a group of farmers who came up with a very climate smart type of approach to farming agriculture to increase productivity among small holder farmers. So we partnered with them and trained small holder farmers as a pilot during the 20, 20, 21 agricultural season. So we provided training, which was around $118 per person, and that included comprehensive training over a week, plus a small pack of your seeds and all the inputs that are needed for the farmers to plant a seed and be able to harvest enough maize for a family of six. We had a mixed bag of results, I have to say. I would love to say it was highly successful, but I think for the pilot we learned a lot of lessons. There were things, of course, that we didn’t know but we should have known or we were too ambitious. But I think the important lesson for me was to understand the impact that if we are to invest more of this patient capital in these small holder farmers, the impact is not only evident to the farmer in terms of higher income per family, but also it gives the farmers the ability to really be empowered and have skills so that even once we are gone, we are not able to offer them patient capital. They still have the ability to grow their crops in a sustainable manner.

Reuben Coulter: Yes, now that it’s super exciting and I believe the partner you are working with is foundations for farming. Is that correct?

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: Absolutely. Foundations for farming. And they have gone all over the world now. I think they are quite their rock star in terms of climate, smart agriculture.

Reuben Coulter: Yeah. So foundations for farming for our listeners is a wonderful organization helping farmers in regenerative agriculture, really using natural organic methods to grow, and they’ve just seen phenomenal results. I believe that Craig Deall is the CEO of Foundations for Farming. We were with them just a couple of weeks ago, and I believe this year was the highest crop yield that Zimbabwe has seen and 25 or 30 years, which is just so encouraging for the country.

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: Absolutely. I think that for me, the turning point was when the government realized that this was a sustainable strategy that would enable the country to be more food secure and also provide farmers with the right skills to be able to produce at a level that can take care of your average family in a village.

Henry Kaestner: Tsitsi I’m hoping you might be able to help us unpack a topic that’s come up a lot, and I’ve thought about it as an investor in Africa a bit too, and navigated through it with the help of some good counsel. But it’s just the concept of patient capital. There’s an investor in America named Marc Andreessen, and he’s famous for saying, I will buy a house, meaning I will make an investment or I will buy a boat, which he says is making a gift, a philanthropic gift. But I won’t buy a houseboat. A houseboat is a combination of two, and they have them on lakes here in America. And what he was doing is he was referring in that illustration to a houseboat being patient capital or an impact investment because it combined too many aspects of both giving and investment. And he just couldn’t make sense of it. So he wanted to stay away from that. I think that we as Christ followers need to be drawn into that space of patient capital, that it’s not so black and white. That’s not just market return capital. We clearly can see through to a 20% return on investment or that is just a gift that there’s a huge area in the middle and yet it is complex. Some of those complexities, as I’ve seen in the past, is how do you think about patient capital amounting to a subsidy and does that create an artificial market distortion that the entrepreneur can work their way out of so that they can then graduate to someplace where they can get access to maybe larger pools of capital that are in the market, but at market rates, how do you process that with your investing? And maybe I’m even thinking about the framework wrong.

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: It’s always important, I think, to look at the context because if you’re sitting in the US. And you’re looking at patient capital. What it means in the US is very different to what it means in Africa. Our histories are different. In the US you are probably maybe second or third generation university exposure to entrepreneurship. You’ve seen US grow from, you know, industrialization to information age, all those phases. We are not in an environment like that. Majority of the people that you are going to come across is first time graduates from university. These are those who you are likely to meet in a conference. But remember, 70% of the population still lives in the rural areas, number one. Number two. 70% of the population has no access to clean water and they have no access to power. So even the concept of a houseboat is strange. So if the fundamentals are different, it’s very difficult to arrive at the same conclusions or to see patient capital with the same lens. So patient capital for me allows us the runway we need as Africans to be able to catch up. So we need to where Europe and the US where the West is there to far ahead. You are talking of GDP per capita of 60,000, 80,000, 100,000. Majority of the sub-Saharan Africa is living on a dollar 90 a day. And so you have to look at where are the areas one needs to invest, number one, to build the skills necessary in order to create an environment that allows open space for innovation, for high levels of productivity, and that requires, you know, high levels of literacy and education. So that’s at one level. And then at the second level to understand the importance of business entrepreneurship. Capitalism is something that many sub-Saharan countries are not familiar with because we come from a background of countries. We are young countries that were born out of liberation movements and most of them with financed and funded by Union of Soviet Socialist Republic and China. So the influences of Russia, India, China in terms of entrepreneurship made entrepreneurship something that is not general mindset was a lot of people generally think of employment and jobs and not job creation and entrepreneurship and then added to that a perception that capitalism is evil and that it takes it does not give. So all these underlying factors, I think, have really affected the way in which you look at investment, you look at wealth creation, and also the way you look at what economic empowerment means. So when I then look at patient capital, I see it as it’s one of the strategies that we need to ramp up and ramp up very quickly in order to help us leapfrog so we can get to a place where we can begin to build an entrepreneurial class that is highly competitive and that can produce products or services at the level of your highly developed countries.

Henry Kaestner: That’s very helpful. So this is an investment. It’s an investment in a generation to be able to build the infrastructure, to build the culture, to build the mindset that encourages innovation and entrepreneurship. And I think what you’re suggesting here is that if you accelerate too fast in expectation that that these entrepreneurs who don’t have the university training and don’t have generations of this type of mindset, if you accelerate them too fast and to needing to return the same type of results you might have from a Western European investment that the system will break, it’ll be thought of as being exploitative and that we just we need to be patient and that the market will develop when people can start to trust the market. Yeah, along those lines, tell me a bit about the participants and I understand enough about sub-Saharan Africa to know that there’s not a broad base of local investors that can put local skin in the game. And yet you clearly are leading by example in that regard. And they bring so much confidence to a Western investor that wants to deploy capital but wants to do it on terms with others that really know the market, understand the culture, and also put their capital at risk, whether it’s patient capital and market return capital. Do you see that developing or are you and Strive just such an anomaly that that has not yet developed? Are you hopeful? Talk to us a little bit about the state of local investment, people investing back into the local community.

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: You know, I would like to think that the story of an I over time becoming the norm rather than the exception. And simply because we were very blessed to go into an industry in which Strive had expertize in. He was a telecoms engineer, so he understood what it takes to invest in an industry like that. He understood that local capital alone will not do it. So he knew that if years to build the business, some of the options he has to look at not only domestic capital to invest in the business, but also to look at long term capital, which is you’re taking the company public in order to deepen and widen the pool, the access, the capital for the business. Also, I think the experience he had had working with, you know, the World Bank has IFC, which was very much active when we started our business in the 1980s, especially in Zimbabwe, investing in medium size businesses and that is patient capital. So he was able to attract some of that funding. But Zimbabwe is not a normal country, by the way, because of the political complications around the US, sanctions against the country, etc.. But we’ve seen an amazing crop of entrepreneurs develop in your Nigeria, in Kenya, we’ve seen even a rising class in Ethiopia, in South Africa. And I believe that has come about by. Government’s understanding the importance of creating a macroeconomic environment and also a regulatory environment that makes it possible for local entrepreneurs to be able to access funding and also to just lower the entry barriers so that it’s easier the opportunities are easier to take advantage of. I think yeah so. h onestly, I don’t think, you know, we are a unique couple by any stretch of the imagination. I think we are very blessed to be able to have done what we’ve been able to do, but we are also in an industry. What we picked was a high growth industry and transitioning from mobile telephony to building fiber internet. I think that also was just very strategic in helping us to expand very quickly in a short period of time.

Reuben Coulter: Yeah, no, it’s it’s so encouraging. You were one of the first couples to sign the Giving Pledge, which, of course, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett and were encouraging other people to give away their wealth and become more generous philanthropists. And but you’ve also gone on to chair the Africa Philanthropy Forum, and you’ve been mobilizing others and encouraging others. And over time, that’s really grown into a substantial movement. And it’s great to see the emergence of philanthropists and investors giving back and making a difference. And COVID 19 has obviously devastated the world. This third wave has been hitting Africa and Zimbabwe particularly hard. What is the situation like on the ground now and how should international philanthropists and investors who are listening to this podcast respond? What should they be doing to support what’s going on?

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: I think, you know, COVID has it has devastated every country globally. And I think initially when it started, when we began to see the effects in countries like the UK, Italy and the US, a lot of people were talking about that maybe between 20 and 25 million Africans would die simply because the health systems, there’s no capacity to respond to the pandemic. And thank God it hasn’t happened that way. And I will say one of the things that I have seen that has really helped was, number one, all hands on deck. That is, everybody understanding they have a role to play in order to ensure that this pandemic does not decimate communities. And it also helps that the tools to make sure information gets very quickly to communities and communities are quickly educated about what COVID is, and its impact really helped a lot. So we were able to see information go quickly, move very quickly into communities on, you know, what is COVID, what are the dos and don’ts and how do you, you know, keep safe? But at the African philanthropy level, the philanthropists really stepped in and they stepped in in millions, not small amounts of money. There was deep levels of collaboration, especially in the private sector. We saw in South Africa a big solidarity fund put up in order to quickly get protective clothing and PPE and also testing equipment in collaboration with the government. We saw Nigerians also step in. They put in more than $100 million to quickly, again, partner with the government to get their test kits on the ground and get as many masses of people tested as quickly as possible. In the smaller countries, what we have seen through our work in African Philanthropy Forum is to see how smaller countries have built networks for resource mobilization money and also businesses have stepped in and a lot of private hospitals have been built in various countries in order to ensure that the health support systems are put in place. What we did in Zimbabwe, for example, we partnered with a philanthropist called Elma Philanthropies, and we’ve done a lot of training of literally from doctors to nurses to auxiliaries, staff training to build morale and strengthen the skills of the health sector. We also were able to partner to bring in quickly deploy equipment that was basic equipment that was needed in the major hospitals in order to ensure that we did not see a breakdown in health delivery services. So, you know, I’ve been very encouraged as an African philanthropist at seeing just how at the local level how communities have stepped in and mobilized resources to be able to respond. Of course, we’ve also seen, you know, schools close. And I think we’ve. Really lost two years in terms of education, kids not learning anything. I think majority of the children in especially in rural communities, just haven’t been to school for two years. So that is a major, major problem we are facing. How do we respond? I think you need the private sector to step in. The government needs to step in. And, of course, philanthropy needs to step in. And I think the donor community needs to change its model. This is also one of the things that became very obvious during COVID. You know, in the past, you’ve had all these donor agencies, communities that are constantly flying all over the continent and spending, having a very high cost structure to deliver their services. And what has been very evident is, well, no one can travel. And it’s not like the continent has collapsed because the donors have not been coming. What has become very evident is change the model, become more efficient in how you deploy resources and that the donor community must can do what it does effectively without having to, you know, to make too many decisions out of, say, in New York, Washington, D.C. or London, but rather to be more trusting of what local communities can do and partner with them to implement work that needs to be done on the ground. And then lastly, leave the private sector to do what the private sector knows how to do, which is they are very good at innovation, good at deploying resources, good at logistics. And also, they’re just an amazing reservoir of ideas to solve problems.

Reuben Coulter: Thank you. I think that’s a wonderful notes for us to end on is the challenge to philanthropists. We need to be locally led. We need to be driven by capable local leadership and trust them and empower them to do what they do best. They know their community, they know their people, and for the private sector and for the investor community to come in and innovate and supports the innovators and entrepreneurs on the continent to help them grow and develop. But don’t just transplant a venture capital model from the US, but understand what type of capital and supports is relevant in the local environments, and how can that help entrepreneurship and innovation flourish for the prosperity of Africa? One final question. We always love to wrap up our interviews with this question, which is Where does God have you, in his words, right now? What is he speaking to you?

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: Oh, I am so excited about what lies ahead, but I really feel we all need to take a very long term view in the decisions we make, whether it is in investment or making decisions in our own growth as individuals or families taking a long term view. See, when we make decisions with a long term view, you are always more willing to absorb the pain of change and decisions that one needs to make. So yeah, that’s what I feel. The Lord is saying that let’s not look at short term benefits and forego long term gains because we want instant gratification.

Henry Kaestner: Tsitsi., I’m grateful for your time. I’m grateful for your leadership in Africa and for the message that you shared with us today. I’m wondering if you might pray for us as we all leave and go out and have days where hopefully we’ll honor God and be used by Him for His glory. In Europe, where Reuben is, and in North America or Justin and I are in and in Africa where you are.

Tsitsi Masiyiwa: Sure, Father, in the name of Jesus. I’m just so grateful for this opportunity. The conversation we’ve had, Lord, these are not ordinary words. These are words that are spirit and life, that not only will they impact the way we think and the way the listeners think and see and perceive what we can do to make the world a better place, but also that these conversations will open up our minds to see just how great our God is and that we, through a difficult season of COVID, that we have an opportunity to do something compelling in unity with the Spirit of God, in unity with one another driven by love. Father, I want to thank you for the impact also of the work that is being done by your children, and that the doors that are open to the new doors that are opened will result in us being able to do things that cause your name to be glorified and to be testified in all this, in the name of Jesus Amen.

Episode 94 – Serving a Big God in a Big Way with Jonathan Reckford

Subscribe to the Podcast:

Jonathan Reckford is the CEO of Habitat for Humanity International. Before joining Habitat, Jonathan spent most of his career in leadership positions at Goldman Sachs, Marriott, The Walt Disney Co., and Best Buy.  Since joining Habitat in 2005, Jonathan has grown Habitat from serving 125,000 individuals each year to helping more than seven million people annually. It’s no surprise why he was named the most influential nonprofit leader in America in 2017. Today, he serves on the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the World Economic Forum. Jonathan joins us today to share some of his story, what God is doing in and through Habitat, leadership lessons he’s learned in his career, and what it means to serve God at scale. 


Episode Transcript

Some listeners have found it helpful to have a transcription of the podcast. Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it. The FDI movement is a volunteer-led movement, and if you’d like to contribute by editing future transcripts, please email us.

Jonathan Reckford: Help, you know, find the cause, the thing that’s bothering you and your community and jump in. But to me, it’s do get your own hands involved in your own feet involved because if you do it just at a head level and you’re not relationally connected, you know, the relational connections create the heart change that then allows us to create the next change.

Speaker 2: Welcome to the Faith Driven Investor podcast. If you’re a fund manager, investor or a financial advisor driven by your faith or want to be driven by your faith, then you’re in the right place. The best way to stay connected in the Faith Driven Investor community is to sign up for our newsletter at Faith Driven Investor talk. This podcast doesn’t exist without you. Our community. One of the things we’ve heard the community asked us for is help in finding great deals to invest in. And so we’ve launched Marketplace. It’s a new platform of funds and direct deals. Everything from private equity and real estate funds to ETFs from philanthropic and market rate deals, Spain to the U.S. and emerging markets. Check it out at Faith Driven Investor. Talk for Marketplace While you’re there, please send us any thoughts you have about how this podcast might better serve you for any questions you have about being a Faith Driven Investor.

Speaker 3: All opinions expressed on this podcast, including the team and guests, are solely their opinions. Host and guest may maintain positions in the companies and securities discussed. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as specific investment advice for any individual or organization.

Rusty Rueff: Hey everybody, welcome back to the Faith Driven Investor podcast. We’re so happy you’re back with us once again this week. Today we have a guest by the name of Jonathan Reckford. Jonathan is the CEO of Habitat for Humanity International. Before joining Habitat, Jonathan spent most of his career in leadership positions at Goldman Sachs, Marriott, The Walt Disney Company and Best Buy. Since joining Habitat in 2005, Jonathan has grown habitat from serving one hundred and twenty five thousand individuals each year to helping more than seven million people annually. It’s no surprise why he was named the most influential nonprofit leader in America in 2017. Today, he serves on the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the World Economic Forum. Jonathan joins us today to share some of his story, what God is doing in and through habitat, and what it means to serve God at scale. Let’s listen in.

Henry Kaestner: Welcome back to the Faith Driven Investor podcast. I’m here with my co-host Luke Roush. Luke, greetings. Welcome.

Luke Roush: It’s great to be here. Great to

Henry Kaestner: be here. How are things in Nashville?

Luke Roush: Things in Nashville are lovely. What a great place to live. Come join us.

Henry Kaestner: A lot of people are you don’t even need to issue that invitation anymore. We miss you out here. We miss you out here. We’re grateful that we’ve got an incredible guest and a friend of both of ours and friend of Justin’s too. As we’ve gotten to know Jonathan over the years at the Christian Economic Forum, so shout out to chuck Bentley and his incredible leadership and bring together a group of men and women just really committed to understanding how God is at work in the marketplace, the financial markets and the macroeconomic environment. And I’ve been looking for this episode in particular because, as I said before we went on air this summer, I had several different highlights which are really cool. It’s just great to emerge from COVID and spend time with friends and family. But there is a hike that I took with Jonathan before the events get started, the Christian Economic Forum that was super encouraging for me and it was encouraging to me on multiple levels. One was a leader in the space that could challenge and encourage me. So it’s great just to spend time with Jonathan Richard just for that reason. But then there are two different things that really made an impact on me. Number one, we spent about half our time talking about what does it look like to be and Russell through being good fathers and how to attend to the different needs of our children. And I hadn’t expected to go on a hike with Jonathan Rickford and come away having been blessed in that area, but I most assuredly was. And then the second one was we spent some good time not just talking about habitat, but the broader macro economic environment that he operates in. Having been the CEO of Habitat for Humanity for a long time now, having served on the board of the Federal Reserve in Atlanta and helping me to just understand just the larger societal challenges that impact poverty and what does that look like and the merger of NGOs and public policy and free enterprise? And just the kind of the bigger cocktail, if you will, that we found ourselves in. Those of us were on this podcast caring about how we invest the assets that God is in trust us with, according to our faith. And in some ways, that can be really simple in terms of being faithful and obedient and getting down on our knees and asking God to lead us in other ways. It can be pretty complicated. And so when you find somebody like Jonathan, they can help you to navigate through that and make it less complicated. And to be clear. Poverty is a complicated process, but whenever you get the chance to spend some time, whether it’s on a hike in Colorado or on a podcast like I hope that you will experience today when somebody can help you to make sense of all that in a way that might be actionable, that’s a big deal. So that’s what we’re hoping to accomplish today. Jonathan, thank you very, very much for being with us.

Jonathan Reckford: Thanks so much, Henry. It’s great to be with you all.

Henry Kaestner: So we’d like to understand everybody’s story that comes on the podcast. And there’s a lot, of course, to you and who you are. And I know a bit about the fact that you grew up in one of the greatest towns in the world. So why don’t you share a little bit about your background and your time before habitat and before the Federal Reserve? Please.

Jonathan Reckford: So thank you and great to be with all of you. More broadly, my story, I would break it. Maybe two parts one the family side and how I got launched, and then a very unlikely career that just shows that God has a sense of humor, I think. But in one now I can look back and see how all those pieces were useful, even if my career didn’t make sense. In some parts along the way, I grew up in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, which is a spectacular place to grow up. Yes, Father was a classics professor at USC, now retired, and that was the fourth of five kids, and it really was a special place to grow up. Did a brief stint in England, which was very formative for second grade when he was on sabbatical, and that probably first opened my eyes to a bigger world in a new way, and I was blessed with a couple of really powerful role models beyond my immediate family. My grandmother was a quite iconoclastic and formidable woman. Her name was Millicent Fenwick, and she was one of the relatively small number of women in the US Congress in the 70s. And she was a civil rights pioneer and ferocious fighter for human rights. And some people know the comic strip Doonesbury. She became famous because Gary Trudeau created his character, Lacey Davenport, after her in the comic strip. But every time I saw her as a kid every summer and Christmas, she would say Myka six eight and is shown your man. What is good and what does the Lord require of you but to act justly love mercy and walk humbly with your God? And then she would ask us what we were going to do to be useful and her view of the good life as we’re supposed to be useful. And it took me a long time to live into that and my other real role models. My godmother, who was an extraordinary pathbreaking woman as well, an Australian who was the first woman president of Smith College and ended up through this talent, becoming lead director of Merrill Lynch, Nike Colgate-Palmolive and the executive chair of Lendlease Corp in Australia. So along with all sorts of nonprofit and writing bestselling books, and she had that incredible ability to be so gifted and yet fully present, which I found quite amazing and really tried to emulate her and I miss. She was my go to person for career advice all the way along, so was launched with that. On the career side, I was going to go to law school and go into politics because that was I was really passionate about and came to the shocking realization as a senior in college that I was only going to law school because I thought, that’s what you did to go into politics. And I had no actual interest in being a lawyer, so had to quickly find something else to do. And I’m not sure I would advise this from a career perspective. But as a political science and English major talked my way into a job in corporate finance at Goldman Sachs. With the hubris that I could learn finance faster than I could teach other people to communicate. And then I suffered mightily for that for a couple of years, and it was a great education and including the learning that I probably wasn’t cut out to be an investment banker. But it was also probably the low point for me in many ways, from a personal perspective, because I wasn’t leading a life that in any way really seemed to line up with who I was hoping to become. I was working all the time and in some ways acting out, and I think that period made me think I needed to readjust. And the first big inflection point for me was then I, instead of going on to grad school and I’d become interested in business. At this point, I applied for a bunch of things and was lucky enough to get a grant from the Henry Luce Foundation to work for a year in Asia and lose. His parents were missionaries in China. He was the founder of Time Magazine and created and still just 15 young Americans from all different fields every year to go work in Asia. And I was a huge sports fan, and Korea was going to host the Olympics so lined up and I was able to go over with Goldman, who was going to finance the first convertible equity offering for a Korean company. And I worked on that deal and then set up a job working for the Olympic organizing committee, doing marketing. And then in a giant twist, and they told me because they were the host country and qualified that they had just fired their rowing coach. They saw this rowing in my background and wondered if I would come and help coach their rowing team. And I told them I was completely unqualified and they said, No, we’re really serious about this. So I quit Goldman early and went to the US rowing coaching college. And if you sort of think Jamaican bobsled team, it would give you a, you know, they they were not globally competitive, but the US coach. We’re not intimidated and loaded me up. And the important part of that story is I spent the year living in the training camp with all the Korean coaches and athletes. And, you know, in a pre-internet pre-digital age, it could not have been a more complete immersion and removal from anything that was familiar for me. And that was the year I really got serious about face. I’d grown up in a nontraditional but devout Catholic family and had never walked away from my faith but never really owned it. And that year in Korea, God put the right person in my life. There were two of us of the 15 of us spread across Asia. The other person in Korea and the only non Korean I would see was my lifelong friend Jim Peterson, who was an American Baptist pastor and had just finished his Ph.D. in the ethics of genetic engineering and just in a brilliant scholar. And he was that person who could both go as deep intellectually, but also had the kind of the Holy Spirit flowing through him. And I met people who had one or the other, and I think he gave me the extraordinary gift of every Monday night for the rest of that year, and we went through systematic theology and the whole New Testament together. And it was really I had such a high bar of not wanting to be a hypocrite, but it was through that process that I gradually got to the point where I could take that leap and make a full adult commitment to my faith. And that really changed everything. So came back and went to Stanford Business School because Stanford was one of the only business schools back then that believe we needed professional management of nonprofits. And I was intrigued with the idea of at that point, I actually wanted to go be Peter Ueberroth and run the Olympics, but I wanted to find a mission that really mattered. And in business school, which is less true today than it was then I thought I should go to the private sector first, learn the skills and then put those skills over once I find the right mission. And what really intrigued me was strategy. And how do you grow organizations? And I know many in this audience are people who are true startups I got interested in how do you start new things within big companies? So I went to Marriott Corporation first and worked on two new businesses for them and then actually got laid off in the S&L crisis, went to The Walt Disney Company and got to work on a couple of big successes and one spectacular failure leading strategic planning for their real estate based entertainment. And then was recruited to a company called Circuit City

Henry Kaestner: before you move on from there. Everybody’s a Disney fan, and I know that you hired one of our great friends and partners at Sovereign’s Capital as an Imagineer. Michael Tremaine. But before you go in there. So two things. How did the cranes do? Did they do better in optics?

Jonathan Reckford: They did not do very well in the Olympics, but we beat the Japanese, which there you go. This context was there was a huge day.

Henry Kaestner: Okay. What did you work on at Disney?

Jonathan Reckford: So at Disney, I worked on their urban entertainment and something called the Disney Vacation Club, which was Disney’s timeshare strategy, which has become a large and very successful business, and then worked on this as a whole podcast in itself or a book someday. But a project called Disney’s America, which was going to be a new urban entertainment concept that then turned into a history based theme park in northern Virginia, which then drew the ire of The Washington Post and turned into a huge mess and ultimately got canceled. So that’s a whole story in itself, but the the original idea actually evolved in a couple of other businesses, which was how could Disney bring entertainment to kind of urban areas in addition to its theme park strategy?

Henry Kaestner: And then downtown Disney ended up being a pretty good success. I think you should take credit for that.

Jonathan Reckford: It is. I certainly don’t. And then there were projects like the town of Celebration, which is actually Disney’s first residential community trying to live a little closer. And that was actually very much tied to their actually their highway and road improvement strategy. So there’s a whole build out of the giant Disney complex, but I love living there and working there. The theme park side is very pixie dust movie studio side, a little more sharp elbowed, but

Henry Kaestner: OK, so going. I’m sorry, I interrupted you. So Circuit City?

Jonathan Reckford: No, I was giving you a long story. So Circuit City was starting something called CarMax, and I was just fascinated by that. And they were going to disrupt the whole way cars were being sold and sort of solve the conundrum of the lemon law and used car sales. So I went to and became head of strategy for Circuit City, and now my business credibility will be shot because of course, CarMax has done great. Circuit City is no longer around. And my hope was actually to start the next car max after we took it public. And then if people read Jim Collins, my old business school professor suggested is the only company that was in both good to great and how the mighty fall. So it became a cautionary tale. And at that point when I joined, they were, you know, had been the top stock on the New York Stock Exchange for a 10 year period and had really redefined big box retailing where retail is a tough area. And if you don’t re redefine, you can still get challenged. And I was then recruited. I really wanted to move from strategy into an operating role and have the the opportunity to be president of another. Now, sadly dead retailer called Music Land and some of you listeners on may be old enough to remember going to the mall to buy music or movies. And back then, Music Man had Sam Goody and Sancho’s video and two other chains and was the largest specialty retailer, music and movie. You said I always loved the entertainment world. And clearly, they had a huge challenge because the internet was coming. And what I didn’t plan on, but we had had grown. The business is the best buy bought it and I’ll fast forward that was in two thousand and two and it was clearly the right thing for the business to sell. It turned out to be a flawed acquisition, and I stayed for a year to help make it work. And then had one of those tough calls, as do I stay or do I go? And as my wife and I prayed about it, it just felt clear I’d already stayed in the private sector longer than I’d ever planned. And this led to a decision to leave, and I usually recommend don’t leave if you don’t know what you’re going to do next. But we just took the lead with a big non-compete clause into protection. And the next big inflection point in the way was that next period because with my wife’s blessing, I finally decided I’d want to do it went off on a short term mission trip to India to serve with a group of Presbyterian pastors in rural India. And it was one of those next moments where I think all those late in issues of social justice came roaring back where we were serving with the bank, which among the Dalits or the outcasts in India and rural areas. This is at the absolute kind of lowest social tier in society, where there are literally only allowed to hand clean latrines or clean up dead animals. And at that time, about half the children were dying before their 13th birthday because of the conditions they were living in.

Luke Roush: So Jonathan, where are you by yourself on this trip?

Jonathan Reckford: I was by myself, but with a group of I think it’s 12 or 13 other. No kids, no, no family on this trip. Actually, my kids were too small. They would have been it would have been overwhelming, I think, at that age. For them, though, they have since been on many trips with me. And so I really had the pastor who founded Habitat or came up with the idea of Habitat for Humanity had this phrase that divine irritation. But it’s that idea that we’re also good at seeing problems in our world and thinking someone ought to do something. But I think that moment of divine irritation is where God grabs you by the scruff of the neck and the responses that I have to do something. And I just came back from that trip with a deep sense of upset around poverty issues and how to engage and turn down a couple of really good business jobs, thinking, OK, I’ve got my deal with God now and almost got a couple of nonprofit jobs with international profits. And in both cases, I got to the finals and then they picked someone who’d already run a nonprofit, which was completely logical. And I was like, God, we had a deal. And suddenly all the doors closed and nothing was opening. And what I really learned in that would turn into quite a waiting period is one it was spectacular for my family and less spectacular for my ego, but in a really good way. And two, if I’m really honest, which is a little embarrassing. My deal was God, I’ll do anything you want as long as it meets my geographic time, financial and social gratification and all my other big deal cutting deal. Yeah, getting the deal and what I had to as imperfectly as I could get there. Move towards Okay God, no conditions is best able. I will. I will follow where you lead. And that, to my great surprise, led to my local church asking me to be the administrative executive pastor, which was not at all what I was looking to do. And all my friends who I trusted for career advice said not to. But Ashley and I really had a sense of that. This was a call and we should be obedient to it. And this is such a nice God part in retrospect accepted the job almost immediately got a call from one of the big headhunting firms with a great opportunity to run an internet retailer. And I remember just telling the search partner, Gosh, that sounds like a great job. I’m going to go work for my local church and I thought I am exiting the market and will be blacklisted forever. And two years later, when I was happily working at the church and not looking, she was the partner leading the habitat search who called up out of the blue and said, Jonathan, do you know anybody who’d be interested in Habitat for Humanity? And if I went back to that list with God, it checked every single thing on the list and I never thought they would hire me, but wrote this very passionate letter, saying, I think this is the kind of thing God has been preparing me for all this time. So that was 2005, and as you can tell, I could never keep a job. But this is it is a challenge, but an incredible joy to be part of this mission since then.

Luke Roush: So how do you think one of the things we talked a lot about in the context of Christian Economic Forum is human flourishing. And what does it look like for human flourishing to exist? Maybe speak a little bit just about housing and the role that plays in individual security community. Maybe just speak to that a little bit.

Jonathan Reckford: You know, I’ve I’ve had a chance to learn so much, Luke about housing. And, you know, I came with the lens not to solve housing by the lens, to think, how do you solve poverty? And certainly what I have experienced and then seen all around the world is housing is clearly not the only thing, but in some ways it’s a prerequisite. So if you think about after food and water, shelter is almost the most basic level of need. And what we know from the data is if people. Child grows up in good housing, she stays healthier, she does better in school and then is in a position to lift herself up over time. If you pull housing out of that equation, it’s extraordinarily unlikely that someone can both stay healthy and be educated. And so in many ways, we think of it as a prerequisite, almost for all the other things we want in life. But if you think about it, we certainly recognize that housing is only one component and people need all the elements of a healthy community, so they need access to food and fresh water. They need, of course, employment and the ability to earn income. They need health, they need education. So they are all interconnected and none of them by themselves. One challenge sometimes the nonprofit world is we all say, well, if we just solve housing, everything will be perfect. And I think the reality is, no, we have to actually partner in ways that create the conditions so that we can meet all the needs of a healthy and sustainable community.

Luke Roush: Absolutely. Absolutely. When you think about so we’ve dabbled as an investor in the kind of real estate technology and through different ways to re-imagine home ownership and trying to broaden access, but maybe just speak a little bit about some of the efforts, whether it’s Terwilliger center or kind of other things that habitat has done to really actually be a first mover in terms of real estate, technology and innovative models to change the system and how homes are owned.

Jonathan Reckford: Well, what I think the giant realization and when I joined in 05, it was an interesting it was not only a part of my plan, but we had the Indian Ocean tsunami, this massive regional disaster in Asia. And then we had Hurricane Katrina hit. Literally, the week I was joining, which was a massive U.S. disaster in terms of housing. And in both cases, it forced us to start thinking about scale in different ways, and habitat had gone really wide. One hundred and three countries and we had at that point one thousand eight hundred U.S. chapters or affiliates, but we were building very small number of houses and all those places. And so the question are in some ways, our core metric had been how many houses can we build? And that’s a really good it’s a good metric. But we flipped it to say, what would it actually take to meaningfully reduce the housing deficit in all the geographies that we serve? And that’s a much more scary question, but forces you in the system thinking a little bit to it what Henry talked about at the opening. Because in many ways, then you have to look at the whole housing value chain and think about how do you create the conditions so that markets would actually work for low income families? And I would argue we started primarily outside the U.S. in low and middle income contexts. Right now, you can clearly make the case in the U.S. that the market is failing because we can’t produce enough housing for low and moderate income families in this country, either. So that started us down a journey. And the first place was really policy and especially in the international context we take for granted in the US that you have property rights, you can get title to your house or entitled to a piece of property. In much of the world, especially women and marginalized groups can struggle to have legal right to stay on their property. And if you don’t have the right to stay on your land, it doesn’t really make sense to take a loan out. It doesn’t make sense to take risks to upgrade. So we created a global advocacy campaign called Solid Ground All Around Property Rights. And if you have a quick example, one of my favorite stories in Bolivia, women didn’t have the right to own land. And if you think about inheritance, divorce, abuse, all the different things that can happen if you have no right. And so we trained an incredibly impressive cadre oblivion women, and they not only successfully got title of their own land, they got the federal law changed. So if a man is married and wants to register either his land or his home, it has to be joint titled with his wife so that that would be an example of changing the enabling environment. Now the next step is can we help those 1.8 million women in Bolivia who now were enabled to be property owners to actually become property owners? And we would count that in the next layer? But so the first step is can we ensure property rights and good housing policy? Next layer was how do we increase access to finance? And what we found is banks in most low and moderate income countries would only lend to the top five percent of the population who actually had both income and property and were viewed as a credit risk. There was a huge unmet need. So we started with a bet that the microfinance industry there could be a business in making small home improvement loans to very low income families. And we started lending our own capital and training microfinance banks to do home lending and then working in the communities with the recipients of those loans that worked so well, we actually created a wholesale fund called Micro Build. We raised $100 million the first time we took on debt, and we started lending that out as a wholesale lender and then fund is now getting closer to wrapping up now. But we have directly helped over a million people get loans and then with add on capital, it’s now helped approaching 10 million people get housing finance. And so we have demonstrated which was the real goal that there a market opportunity for housing lending. And then the next step going down that housing value chain was could we impact services and products? And we created under this umbrella of our 12 Center for Innovation and Shelter, a shelter venture fund, small scale and shelter tech accelerators where we’re investing with and alongside entrepreneurs around the world who are coming up with better building products for very low income families. And then in some cases, they can actually test their markets with habitat in terms that we can be a buyer in a test market for them. In other cases, we’re creating cohorts to help them grow or scale their businesses because that would improve the access to good products for the families we’re trying to serve. And then the last step has been around skilled trades and how do we increase access and validate quality trades in the community? So the goal would be if we did this successfully, that all the conditions for healthy market would exist, where in some ways we could pull back and families can improve their own housing, which can scale. That’s how we’ve moved from helping tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands to millions of. Families, but we know the need is still far greater.

Henry Kaestner: So that’s super motivating on a bunch of different levels. One of them is that presumably at the outset of Habitat for Humanity, there was a desire to address the felt need of more affordable housing in partnership with the families. And there’s so much about the habitat model that we’ve come to know their families several skin in the game, they labor and it’s just a great opportunity to partner with local church. So we’ve understood that. And that’s one of the things that I learned on this hike that really just really changed my my context, my framework about the space. I thought that habitat was known for the 50 houses that it built in Durham, which is for those 50 families, is a very big deal, to be very clear. But we talked about the fact that Durham was short 14000 housing stock. And what you’ve been able to look at, let’s look at the problem that we’re trying to solve here. And at the beginning it was let’s get affordable housing. We’ll do it by building houses. But then under your leadership, you’re let’s say, what’s the bigger picture here? And are we ever going to be able to make a big enough splash through the tactic that we have of building houses? And let’s take a step back and understand what the broader mission and vision is and some of the other things we can do in addition to building houses. And so I thought that was great. And whenever an executive director of the ministry comes up and talks less about their programs, but more about why they’re doing what they’re doing in the larger systemic issues, I don’t I think that that’s awesome. That’s the type of ministry partner I get really fired up about. And then after coming out of that, you’ve been able to provide us all with a framework that starts off with policy and talking about homeownership and talking about title. Then you talk about finance and you talk about innovation, and then you talk about increasing access to skilled trades. And in none of those did you actually talk about building houses, but that’s how you’ve gone from serving 10000 families seem to be clear. All those 10000 families have had lives changed and transformed. But how you able to go ahead and look at the global issues? That’s super motivating and encouraging. I love all that talk about both of us.

Jonathan Reckford: But what I left out, which I hope many of your listeners and if you haven’t, you should is the volunteer peace and COVID has really gotten in the way of some of that BAM one lens that went with that. That sort of circles the loop is we want to engage the huge number of volunteers with habitat in some ways, not as a construction strategy, but as a social change strategy. And so if you put that together, and the reason we want people to come out and volunteer is when they come out. In some cases, it’s the first time they’ve actually had meaningful interaction with somebody outside their socioeconomic class in a relationship. And it helps them to understand and experience the mission in a way so that hopefully they will then become the people who are willing to change those local zoning laws. They’re willing to actually get engaged in thinking about housing differently. So if you then do the full circle, if we can change hearts and minds so that we can change policies so markets can work better, so habitat and other houses can build more houses in our case, then we can engage more volunteers who hopefully then keep making that change happen.

Luke Roush: And that’s powerful.

Henry Kaestner: So if I’m listening to this in Memphis, Tennessee or Eugene, Oregon or Billings, Montana and I’m just impacted by food, water and shelter, and I’m just really drawn to the shelter part. What are some tangible next steps about getting involved? What can people do? Maybe a good point of entry is to volunteer and to see how habitat does it. But talk to us a little bit more about bridging that gap of getting people in the game, advocating for policy change. I love the fact that, you know, Luke comes out this Luke, you know, public policy guy out of Duke. And so this is right up your alley, too. But public policy seems like it’s so politics. It’s just hard to just even get your arms around. How do you advocate for that? And yet some of that public policy change will do more than if you volunteered it, you know, building 100 houses. So how do you get involved?

Jonathan Reckford: I think it’s a both end. Of course, we want everyone to come help with habitat, so that goes without saying. But the reality is that everybody should help habitat help, you know, find the cause, the thing that’s bothering you and your community and jump in. But to me, it’s do get your own hands involved in your own feet involved because if you do it just at a head level and you’re not relationally connected, you know, the relational connections create the hard change that then allows us to create the next change. And I would say, sadly, all across America, it’s all talk us context. Now, what we have moved from is historically mixed income communities to economically and sometimes racially segregated communities, and economic segregation is creating an outcome that your zip code to some extent determines your economic future. Because what we know is that mixed income communities create the best outcomes actually for everybody, but particularly for historically disadvantaged groups or low income families. And so, you know, a great example my beloved hometown and actually just happened last week. So very fresh example when I grew up. If you worked for the university, you could live in the town. That’s not true anymore, really. Only the business school and medical school professors or tech entrepreneurs can live in town. Everyone else has to live outside Chapel Hill, so it’s no longer, you know, when I went to Catholic. Church growing up, anybody who is Catholic, so the church had blue collar and white collar doctors and business people and academics, all in community together. Not true anymore because only upper middle class people can live and therefore are the ones who are worshiping together. And then what has happened is sadly, this is not a Democrat or Republican thing. Human nature is once you’re a homeowner, you want to protect your major investment. And so not in my backyard or nimbyism is such a big deal and the brand of affordable housing is so broken. So that was a long way of getting to your question, which is what we really need are people of goodwill, and churches and people of faith should be at the forefront of this, which is how do we create inclusive communities where you do have mixed income and where there is a path of opportunity for folks? And in Chapel Hill, actually, I got to do the groundbreaking last weekend of an amazing mixed income community, and I’m so excited. But it took almost 19 years to get done because of community resistance. And so they were going to give up after 15 years of being rejected for being allowed to use it for habitat homes. They actually expanded their vision, which was a step in faith, bought more land. And last week we broke ground on a community that is going to be one hundred and one habitat homes and another one hundred and fifty market rate, affordable market rate, condos and houses. And it’s going to be a spectacular community, but it’s a good example. It couldn’t happen unless you got both City Council and the mayor and private sector leaders and the university. Everybody had to kind of come to the table to get that passed. And that’s where I think if people can first kind of get skin in the game and then translate that into being willing to talk to their neighbors and actually create some of that change, those two can go together.

Henry Kaestner: Is there a central resource also? So I love that example. I love the new expression nimbyism. I’ll use it three more times today. I may or may not give you credit. Is there another resource also that once you go ahead and you’ve done the the hard side and you roll up your sleeves and you’ve actually worked and you’ve gotten to know a little bit? Are there resources? Are there Bly’s? Are there podcasts that kind of explore the housing situation and where people can learn more about this? Yeah.

Luke Roush: Or funds or people who have kind of made a name for themselves, either through the investments it made or the strategies they’ve employed, he’d love to get your sense

Jonathan Reckford: from several different things. So, you know, a shortcut. We actually through COVID, have been doing a campaign called Homes Community Hopes and you and we’ve done a series of episodes so you can go to Habitat Ward and each one is tackling a different elements. The last one I did was with our new HUD secretary talking about some of these issues. Before that, we had one focused on housing and race and some of the historical issues there. We did one on economic models for housing innovations and housing. So those are some accessible kind of shorter versions. Actually, one of my dear friends and heroes, Ron Tolaga, who is the founding donor behind our Tillegra center, has also created a bipartisan center for housing at the Bipartisan Policy Center. And that’s a good source. There is the Urban Land Institute. There are a number of places that you know where there is as good information around housing and housing policy. Certainly the National Housing Conference, which we are a member, you know, and there’s federal level housing policy. But a lot of it is still local. And in some ways, the fundamental thing which is I love this audience is we have a supply problem. So the real question is how do you change the market conditions such that we can actually build way more houses we’ve been under building ever since the Great Recession? And that means we can now have a cumulative gap of four to five million units of housing. So one of the sessions actually I really enjoyed was what would it take to build ten million houses in the United States? And we had the the president of the Atlanta Fed and we had the head of the National Housing Conference and we had the chief economist for the Mortgage Bankers Association. And that was a great conversation because, you know, what would it take to do a step change level of increasing supply? And in some ways, we’ve got to think at that level from a federal perspective, but at the local level in your community? Same question. What would it take from a multi sector approach to make it possible to build enough housing for everybody in that community and make the math work? And the reality from a public policy perspective is that we’ll take some subsidy in either land or financing.

Luke Roush: So 10 million units is a lot. How many years of sort of, you know, pedal down work is that to actually dig out of that hole?

Jonathan Reckford: So we’re building depending on the month and year, you know, we were building between 700000 and 1.4 million units a year as a country. So that gives you a sense that, you know, we’ve got to significantly increase our build rate to catch up because we are if you assume any kind of growth in households, you’ve got a little bit of COVID distortion. But Covid’s actually made it worse because suddenly everybody wanted more living space. And so it’s actually exacerbated the problem because incomes haven’t gone up nearly as fast as housing prices, and that’s part of that supply imbalance problem.

Luke Roush: One, he’s got a whipsaw problem on materials, too, you

Jonathan Reckford: know, and huge supply. And issues lumber has just exploded, but many other items have slowed down, and skilled labor is scarce, so you’re getting squeezed on of all the key inputs.

Henry Kaestner: So you talk about that. So the last two areas, your framework, having added volunteers in to it as well, but where innovation and increasing access to the skilled trades. Can you talk a little bit about both of them? So you have a fund you alluded to? You said you’ve got a fund that invest in innovations in building better building products. Can you talk a little bit about that before you get into the work that you’re doing in increasing the amount of skilled tradespeople they come in? But tell us about running a fund.

Jonathan Reckford: So that has been quite a learning experience. So we’re actually exploring two additional funds. So we actually hired a fund manager. So in this case, we use a group called Triple Jump from the Netherlands because we didn’t have experience being a fund manager that we control the investment committee. But they do the vetting of the potential microfinance banks and organizations that are borrowing from us against our criteria. And then we’re looking at a larger fund that would continue to do housing microfinance, but also look at potentially micro mortgages and some larger scale loans as well, and a little bit bigger scope. So we’re just finishing the feasibility and we’re actually doing our feasibility for our first ever U.S. focused fund around a housing opportunity fund to help habitat affiliates, but also other housing non-profits to be able to acquire property. Because there’s a little bit of a gap today in the ability to the private sector can move so fast to grab property that non-profits are often at a big disadvantage. So we want to bring some more capital to that space. And again, we’re doing feasibility work there. Some examples outside the U.S. of the kind of we just made an investment in a company called Vaster TV, a stay in India, and they are building 3D printed houses in India. So we just built the first 3D printed home in India, and we think there’s an interesting growth opportunity there. There’s another company, also India based, that I think is really interesting. They have a great waterproofing technology that a lot of people are living in concrete homes with flat roofs, and there’s a huge cost if they get leaks, obviously quality of life and health issues, but also it degrades the quality of the home over time. So it’s a relatively low cost treatment that extends the life of that home significantly and improves the quality of life for the family in terms of livability. A third example is a company in Africa. In multiple countries now, which started in Rwanda that is called Earth Enable, and they found a process for sealing Earth floors to give them the health benefits of a cement or concrete floor. And so by compacting and then sealing it, it helps with many of the health benefits. There’s a huge health benefit for a family to have a proper or hard floor. And this, for a fraction of the price, allows the family to get those benefits from a smaller piece. So those are examples of. We also have a clean cookstove investment that’s rolling out very quickly in Africa. And because indoor air quality is such a big issue, even though it’s you could say it’s a little peripheral to housing, but if you’re cooking with kerosene indoors or charcoal or even worse, the health and air quality is so bad. So if we can actually lower costs for the family and improve their air quality, that’s a that’s a significant quality of life. But those are all private sector investments. And our thesis actually is the private sector can scale those things faster and they’re actually coming with solutions that are meaningful for those low income families and the communities we serve.

Luke Roush: One last question and then we’ll wrap, but 60 seconds or less. How do you see habitat partnering with the local church? Is there anything to be done there? Yeah, speak to that.

Jonathan Reckford: Maybe, you know, the church has been so much at the core of habitat, and it goes in some ways, a wise person say a long time ago, there are problems you solve and tensions you manage. And how do we keep that grassroots faith side and have the benefits of scale? Because as we move towards market based solutions, private sector actors, public policy, you lose that incarnational personal relationship on the ground in the community. And I think that’s where the church really comes in in a powerful way. And my hope is, you know, how that literally started in church basements all over the country and world. And my hope in some ways now is that we can be a servant back to the church because I think in our increasingly unchurched world, I think the face of the church has got to be come served with me, creating the credibility for a spiritual friendship that can then lead to come worship with me. And I think finding so if we can be a vehicle for churches to express in a very tangible way in the community, their faith and build relationship, I hope that. But for me personally, that’s a huge value because it is, I think, one of the the other tensions we want to live in is can we be Christ centered and radically inclusive? And some people today would say, you have to pick one. We are fully committed to both ends of that, but there are tensions that come with that.

Luke Roush: OK, so we got to keep going on that topic, though, because that’s actually the most interesting conversation that I had this year at the Christian Economic Forum is what you just said. So I know we got another call coming here, but this is really important. Maybe speak a little bit more to what you just mentioned in. Terms of radical inclusion, but also Christ centered. How do you navigate that leading an organization as diverse and as broad as habitat?

Jonathan Reckford: You know, our board is actually going to be talking about it in a couple of weeks and it’s something that I don’t think you ever saw that that we have to hold up that the, you know, the front of our mission statement is putting God’s love into action and the center is bringing people together and in ways those reflect those two pieces. So at our best, I think about when I was in Indonesia, in Banda Aceh, after the tsunami, one of the saddest places ever been context was there was a civil war. Christians were not allowed into Aceh and we had a habitat team from both the region and Habitat Indonesia that was part Christian, part Muslim. And I heard one of the comments and habitat as a Christian ministry. And one of the comments, one of the families when we were visiting with them was and obviously among all the heartbreak that they had rebuilt now they were starting to put together. And they said, you know, we may not share their faith, but we’re so glad they’re here. Those Christians helped us rebuild our community. You know, I think God can do a lot with that. And sometimes you know, what our call is is to show up with the serving towel and just love people and have faith from that. But it is tricky in today’s environment, and I think the biggest if the framing is, you have to pick one. It’s all over because we will tilt towards inclusion and end up drifting. I think from the center we would actually reframe that to say we are inclusive because of our faith. Jesus modeled inclusion and God loves every child in this world and in fact, the greatest love you or I have for anyone that we know is a pale shadow of God’s love for every child. So that’s the moral call to inclusion. It’s the reflection of our faith and our call.

Henry Kaestner: OK, that was gold. That was awesome. Jonathan, I’m so grateful for you and your friendship and your partnership and your leadership and being at the front end, the pointy end of the spear of a really global organization that’s doing things at scale, serving at the highest levels of government with the work that you’re doing with Federal Reserve, speaking into small communities and large ones. And yet, you know, a point back to your foundational faith and trying to understand not just like, well, I go to church on Sundays. And then I do have a and we just get an air on that radical inclusion side. But fighting that fight and just being able to point back to the most inclusive exclusive religion of all time, the inclusive story of Jesus Christ. So that was awesome. Thank you. Is there something that you’re hearing? One of the things we asked for every one of our guests on either a Faith Driven Entrepreneur podcast or Faith Driven Investor? My. Is there something that you’re hearing from God through his word and it doesn’t need to be this morning. It could be over the course of last week, last couple of months, but something that you feel that he’s speaking to you about through his word.

Jonathan Reckford: You know, thank you. Thank you for that opportunity. I was actually reflecting. I gave devotions. We have a virtual leadership conference going on this week with all of our board chairs and national directors from across Latin America and the Caribbean. And I was giving devotions on Monday night and and talked about the idea of waiting on the Lord and the AHA. And it reminded me of a conversation we’d had many years back with a group of theologians and often in my mental model waiting on the Lord is sequestering myself and having time to go deep and listen. And that’s really important. But this was a little bit of a twist on that day of wait on the Lord, which is we should actually put our serving towel and go serve the Lord. So it’s actually turning that around. Do can we wait like a restaurant server on the Lord? And how do we, as we’re trying to hear God’s voice, do that in faith? And it reminded me certainly of which we need for the COVID time of, you know, the message Joshua heard over and over again to be strong and courageous. The Lord, your god will be with you. And then I’m struck by that moment where finally, after 40 years, they’re going to cross into the promised land and the Jordan. Not the trickle it is today. Is this rushing river? And they had to actually step into the water, the end of the storm and then God’s still the water, and they were able to cross into the promised land. And so I think combining that idea, wait on the Lord with how do we keep stepping out into faith in the middle of the rushing rivers that are around us right now? And trust that God will be with us.

Episode 77 – Investing with the Environment in Mind with Tim Macready

Subscribe to the Podcast:

Faithful listeners of the show might recognize the voice of Tim Macready on today’s episode. Today, he’s going to talk to us about a topic we haven’t really covered yet—investing with environmental care in mind. 

Tim took us from the Garden of Eden to Narnia to Middle Earth and explained why the creative vision that created all of these places focuses on the beauty within them, and how it’s our responsibility as image bearers of God to take care of what we’ve been given to cultivate and care for.

His work as CIO of Brightlight has given him a unique platform to lead this conversation, and we can’t wait for you to hear the investing opportunities he’s seeing that have environmental stewardship at the forefront.


Episode Transcript

Some listeners have found it helpful to have a transcription of the podcast. Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it. The FDI movement is a volunteer-led movement, and if you’d like to contribute by editing future transcripts, please email us.

Tim Macready: When we look at the new heavens and the Earth, we look at the new creation in Revelation, it’s not new in the sense of destruction and recreation, it’s new in the sense of purification and refinement, in the same way that I, as a human being made in God’s image, will be renewed and restored and given a body that is unlike anything I could imagine and yet has obvious links back to me, present day to Macready on Earth. I think the new creation will be a purification, a restoration, a renewal of what God created in Genesis.

Henry Kaestner: Welcome back to the Faith Driven Investor podcast. I’m here with Luke Roush Sovereign’s Capital in the house from his remote studio in Durham, North Carolina. Luke, welcome.

Luke Roush: It’s great to be here sitting in Durham Bulls ballpark

Henry Kaestner: that I love. I love Durham. Are you getting back to Duke? Are you getting back to your alma mater on this trip?

Luke Roush: We did and got a great walk around this campus with none other than Jake Thompson last night. It’s really wonderful to win.

Henry Kaestner: That’s a win. I wish I was there. We’ve got one of our favorite people on the planet on the podcast with us today. This is something we’ve been looking forward to a lot. When you’re last here. You’re working for Christian silver, but things have changed recently. Now you’re with bright light, which is very, very similar and yet a little bit different. So talk about that a bit. And then what led you to the transition for your current role?

Tim Macready: So, as you mentioned, Henry has spent the last 15 years working on what it looks like to faithfully apply Christian values in the context of diversified institutional scale pension funds, investment portfolio, which is an immense privilege, an opportunity to get to think through how our faith applies across every public private growth defensive and how we do that in the context of an organization that was investing one and a half billion dollars on behalf of thirty thousand people. What we saw as we did that was an opportunity to take that approach much broader. And so as I and some of the others, the Christian said, it reflected on personal calling and sensed God’s movement within faith based investing and saw some of the things that were happening in this movement more broadly. We saw an opportunity to take the work that we had done at Christian support and serve a whole range of other faith based and values based investors with the same type of work so that not just Christian Super, but more and more people might be able to align. And so we launched it like we launched it out of Christians before we took a number of the team that had worked together to build a Faith Driven Investor BAM portfolio there. And we launched them into an organization that was going to be able to help others. Christians, super wonderful organization. Pension funding constraints to being a pension fund is an organization that has been more so we can help all sorts of investors all around the world. And so we work with clients across Australia, New Zealand, Japan, the United States. We’re hoping to add more countries to that list. And we do a bunch of work all around this idea of aligning portfolios with values. So we support on screening activities. We help identify managers who are going to be able to deliver values, the portfolios in listed equities, for example. And then a bunch of the work that we do is on the faith driven side, helping institutional investors, registered investment advisors and others to think through personal conviction and application on Faith Driven Investor portfolios. And so sometimes that looks like outsourcing services. Sometimes that looks like one of diligence on a Faith Driven Investor. But I’ve found whose operating strategy that they’re not familiar with. And so we come in and do a research report, due diligence on them and make recommendations. But it’s been a real blessing as we’ve built this out over the last four years now and launched it out from Christian Super into the broader world of faith and values driven.

Henry Kaestner: So there are some number of people that are talking about values investing and have been for some time. What makes you all unique is the faith driven part of it. When Luke and I started Faith Driven Investor and several years back, we remarked the fact that as investors, it was very ironic for us to get involved in a market in which there wasn’t any real supply nor any real demand. And yet we see both of those increased. And I’m going to presume that you’ve seen the same as you’ve gone ahead and started to launch Bright Light. What are you seeing in terms of the demand for people saying, I don’t want to just necessarily just have values based investing, but also on the faith side, are you saying that the demand is picking up there?

Tim Macready: Yeah, absolutely. In the secular world, impact investing is taking off and we’ve seen that grow and the rise of ESG strategies, environmental, social and governance oriented strategies. But in the faith driven world, we’re seeing significant interest in Faith Driven Investor in applying our faith into our investment portfolios. Luke, you’ve spoken before about the analogy of a supermarket that has the customers in the doors and the products on the shelves think well and truly past that. There’s lots of products on the shelves. There’s still gaps in the aisles where products need to fit the certain types of products that as consumers we might want to buy that aren’t out there yet. But the shelves, the feeling and the customers are starting to come into the store. And then what’s happening around that is this ecosystem is springing up of people who support buyers and sellers, intermediaries who might help you to know what sorts of products you want to buy so that you can cook up. If we’re going to stretch the analogy so that you can cook up a delicious meal that is Faith Driven Investor.

Henry Kaestner: So for any listeners that might be new to the show or just new this conversation, some amount of them are thinking that, OK, this is a recipe for lower return. OK, invest according my values. I can just go ahead and just. Off six or seven hundred basis points of return right off the bat, and yet you haven’t seen that. Exactly. Can you speak to that?

Tim Macready: A bit of our experience has been that you can apply these sorts of strategies across the portfolio without damaging return, in some instances, maybe even seeing a return enhancement from the sorts of strategies that we’ve adopted. We can demonstrate that in certain points in the market cycle, our exclusions add value and they certainly don’t detract value in the Faith Driven Investor we’ve invested in Faith Driven Athlete and values the line assets across public and private markets, across real estate, private equity, private debt, infrastructure. And we’ve found that the returns from those investments have been as good, if not better, than the returns that we get from similar investments in other asset classes. We don’t think this is about giving up or sacrificing return in order to live out values. In fact, one of the things that we think all Faith Driven Investor is a call to is excellence and achieving the best that they can with what God has entrusted to them. There are certainly parts of the market where concessional returns are being offered and taken in order to catalyze certain impacts. And we do have some clients who want to be cavaletti and sacrifice for them. But most of the people we work with are looking for market rate returns with their values, large portfolios.

Luke Roush: So there’s a bunch of Christians and we’re talking about social, spiritual and financial returns with how they steward capital. But there’s another word that oftentimes comes up in that same list that you’re keen to focus on, and that’s environmental. So why do you think, Tim, believers have tended to overlook that as part of the conversation?

Tim Macready: I think there’s a whole bunch of reasons. It’s a really complex question. And I think some of those reasons are actually theologically, I think our focus should be primarily on the way that our business affects people of all creation. We humanity are uniquely made in God’s image. All of creation is God’s fingerprints, but we uniquely and solely his image bearers and God’s word contains constant exhortations for us to trade his image bearers with dignity and respect and care to work towards reconciliation of relationships between God and people or between people and each other. And even when we look at the reconciling work of Christ, I think it’s first and foremost about restoring the relationship between us and God. And so I think when it comes to Faith Driven Investor, we have rightly focused on firstly on the way that our investments reflect the creatures that are made in God’s image as a foremost priority. But I think what that has meant is a lot of people have stopped there and there’s been perhaps some not so great reasons why we’ve shied away from investing for environmental water theologically. I think there’s many Christians today who consciously or unconsciously see the world in a dualistic sense. What I mean is they see the physical world as corrupted and decaying and they see the spiritual world as holy and being redeemed. But I don’t think that’s how the Bible describes the world. Yes, the physical world has been subject to the effects of sin. And yet at the same time, the whole creation groans for its liberation from the effects of sin longs for restoration. I think when we talk about reconciled relationships, it’s not just between us and God. It’s between us and each other and between us and the rest of creation. I also think we may have misunderstood what Revelation teaches us about the new creation. I will be the first to admit that I struggle to understand revelation and that channel has been doing at the Village Church a great series on this over the last four or four months, which has been really helpful for me. But I think what we have from Revelation is this idea that the whole earth is going to be destroyed and so are not going to burn and pillage it and just take its resources now because the whole thing is going to be destroyed and recreated. And I think that when we look at the new heavens and the earth, we look at the new creation in Revelation. It’s not new in the sense of destruction and recreation. It’s new in the sense of purification and refinement, in the same way that I, as a human being made in God’s image, will be renewed and restored and given a body that is unlike anything I could imagine and yet has obvious links back to me, present day to McCrady on Earth. I think the new creation will be a purification, a restoration, a renewal of what God created in Genesis.

Luke Roush: Yeah, channelers. Great on that. And I think and right, right on some of that too is surprised by him.

Tim Macready: Yeah. Fantastic book wasn’t what I thought it was going to be about, but amazing. A book called Surprise. I hope it was all about death, but it was all about death and in the context of the new creation. And then I think there’s other reasons we’ve shied away from it as well. Relationally, we’ve often associated care for the environment with a particular worldview that rejects God and idolizes creation, that treats humanity as just another animal, not as unique image bearers of God. And we all have that tendency as humans to judge ideas and concepts based on people we hear them from rather than the merits of the idea. And so the. We reject a lot of that world view that idolizes creation, we rightly reject that worldview. Unfortunately, we throw out parts of the world that are actually scripturally based around K4 creation. I think it’s also practically very difficult. Understanding the role I have to play in showing love to my neighbor is quite concrete. It’s quite tangible. Understanding my role as a steward of creation is much more difficult. It’s less tangible. It’s hard to understand what affect my personal actions are having on God’s creation. It’s hard to understand what sacrifices I might need to make. But the reality of our present situation is quite clearly that we are consuming the natural resources that God has given us at a faster rate than they are able to be replenished. And I’m not saying it’s impossible that we could continue that our current right and that human ingenuity will find ways of being more effective and being more efficient and managing creation better. And of course, Jesus could come back tomorrow and restore and redeem the whole of creation. But I think if we continue at that pace of consumption without rethinking the way that we approach using the planet’s resources, we will cause significant harm to our planet’s ability to sustain human flourishing, which is one of the things that you’ve heard me say before, love human flourishing. I think C.S. Lewis and Tolkien both got this. Think about the world that they created. I find it fascinating that both of them created this fantasy world where evil destroyed the creation. When you’re talking about Middle Earth or Narnia, evil trees creation as a set of resources to be used and exploited for its own ends. And both Lewis and Tolkien created this world in which humanity, the men, the people in the story, the women and the people in the story has agency and dominion. The fates of Narnia and Middle Earth depend on the actions of the human actors in those worlds, in those stories, in overcoming evil. But both of them created worlds in which nature is a force in itself. And nature is this force that works alongside the humans and the good team, so to speak, in those universes to rescue the world. The trees in both Narnia and Middle Earth as support actors to the protagonists to help them on their quest. I think you find in both writers these profound reflections on the relationship between environment people and underlying spiritual realities and the mission that we’ve been given as people to advance God’s cause in the world so good.

Luke Roush: So I want to get just tactical because I think that that kind of over ERG of both why it is oftentimes neglected, because people are focused on the human human interactions rather than sort of human and God’s creation interactions. I think that’s really helpful, just as a construct and also why it’s important. And I think that the Narnia and Middle Earth tie ins are really, really good. I want to get tactical, though, and just have you talk about one of the creative or several of the creative investments that you guys are looking at now in the environmental care space. And why should our listeners be excited about what God has shown you now?

Tim Macready: It’s not just stuff going on, which is really cool. We’re seeing traditional things, renewable energy that provides power that’s not harming the planet. And it’s often cheaper than the power that we are able to get from burning forms of fuel to produce energy with any bunch of innovations in clean technology. And with that comes innovation in using the resources that God’s given us better. And this is a really interesting example of where I think the financial and the creation care aspects of pooling work really nicely together, because of course, when you find ways of reusing or reducing the amount of inputs that you need to produce a certain output, that’s not just good for the planet and for God’s creation, it’s good for the bottom line as well. Similarly, as I’ve alluded to, we’re finding that in many parts of the world, renewable energy is now cheaper than fossil fuel based forms of energy. That doesn’t mean that all the problems have been solved. There are still challenges in many parts of the world with using renewable energies as a baseload power source. The sun shines during the day. The wind only blows on windy days. Hydro is completely stable most of the time until you get a drought. So I don’t want to shy away from the challenges here. But certainly more and more of our energy needs globally is coming from sources that are doing less harm to the planet. And then we’re seeing some fascinating stuff in more thoughtful approaches to creation care in other areas sustainable agriculture, sustainable forestry, even things like sustainable tourism and thinking about the way that we use the natural beauty of the creation in ways that cause reflection and awe and enjoyment of God’s creation rather than simply just taking it and using it. I think one of the amazing things about creation is it reflects the beauty of the creator. Look at the mountains, the rivers, the valleys. Imagine who made them and how awesome and majestic is. Imagine the creativity of the creator. Who created rhythms of days, of seasons, of months of years, and when we find ways of enabling people to contemplate and reflect on God’s creation. My personal experience has been a deep sense of growing closer to the creator, to our father in heaven, as I reflect on his creation of being amazed by what he’s created and being drawn to him through his creation. And so we’re finding, as I said, sustainable tourism, thinking about land and the environment in ways that are financially profitable through being amazed that God’s creation, rather than just taking the resources he’s given us and using them to produce more widgets.

Henry Kaestner: So I’m fascinated by this and I’m fascinated because I’m trying to figure out, do I find myself more drawn to creation care because of revelation or am I more focused on the original job of us to tend the garden? But what I’d like you to comment on, actually, before we bring it back into the field of investing, my partner will bring us back into this. But for you to comment on what might otherwise be an obstacle to people to come to faith. So the inverse way of talking about what you mentioned, which is people that would otherwise be seen by CROSSFIREs, is just worshiping the creation rather than the creator. It would seem that if Christ followers are known for a not necessarily the state of creation care or maybe an apathy toward it, that that might be an obstacle for folks that might say, well, I’d be more inclined to investigate the Christian faith, but this is what they stand for and what they don’t stand for. And so I thought I’d brought to Romans, which is the evidence of God’s creation bears witness and testimony to God. And so maybe they’re seeing something in creation and the beauty of it worth preserving that maybe even Christ followers don’t really get. Can you talk a little bit about what you’d like to see, maybe theologically and maybe in just in terms of how Christians lean into that as a way to be able to make the Christian faith to seem more attractive and winsome? Because I don’t think people talk about that that much. I hadn’t expected to ask you this question because it’s not exactly with regards to investing, but my sense is that you’re thoughtful about this, too. What would you say as this being an obstacle or a hindrance for people otherwise they come to faith.

Tim Macready: What I look at the world, at what God has created, I see the work of an artist and at the same time simultaneously the work of an engineer, I’m immensely thankful that over the last several hundred years we have developed plumbing and hot water and logistic systems that can bring to me the produce of the land from all over the world that I might enjoy. And I think we’re right to see creation that way as the resources God’s given us to sustain human flourishing and catalyze human ingenuity. And yet, as I said, I also see this work of an artist. And I think if we as God’s children look at his creation as merely a set of resources to be exploited for our own benefit, we ignore the artistic value of what he’s created. And in doing so, I think we say to the world that watches that we don’t care about the artistic ness of the creator. Imagine walking into a museum and seeing a beautiful Van Gogh, not for the beauty of the painting, but for the resources that can be extracted from the paint. Imagine looking at it and saying I could take this frame and cut it up and use it to fuel my fire at home. And I could take this canvas and I could repurpose it as a shelter. It just completely misses the point of what Van Gogh created in the first place, but only looking at the raw materials rather than the artistic value of the creation. And I think when we as Christians ignore the beauty of creation, we say to the watching world that we don’t value God’s artistic creativeness. We say that we don’t value creation for the creativity and beauty that it clearly has. Theologically, I go into Genesis one where God created man and woman and gives them dominion over everything that he has created, not so that they might conquer it or exercise power over it, so that they might manage his creation in a way that reflects him, that reflects his creativity, his beauty. It’s about tending the garden. It’s even about tenderness. God, through the sounds that Thomas writes of God’s continued care for his creation, sending the rain, sending the seasons, changing the ground, looking after what he’s created. And to me, this is exciting by the creation mandate is not just a mandate to maintain, but to create and to cultivate, to take what God has given and to steward in ways that are creative and beautiful, to take what he’s given us. We can’t create from nothing the way that God did. But we can use what he gave us to create objects of function. And remember that creation still testifies to its creator remains a creation, right, in your expectation for our revelation as the children of God, Colossians one, not just in Jesus, everything was created not just through him, everything was created, but for him, everything was created. Not just people that might be restored to relationship with him, but an entire creation live in harmony, in relationship. And I’m reminded of a book that I read often to my children, Yunos Garden, which depicts this emergence of human civilization and nature in harmony, in parallel, flourishing together, and compares it to this idea of the factory city where there’s plenty of economic profit, but human flourishing suffers because we’ve polluted the air, we’ve destroyed the rivers, and we’re not able to look out and see the trees and the beauty of God’s creation. It fascinates me that the opening and closing images of God’s word, the garden we have the Garden of Eden, where Adam and Eve live in perfect harmony with the rest of God’s creation. And we have the Garden City where the fullness of what God has created is revealed. Man has tended to and cultivated and developed this civilization, this city. And yet it’s not just a city, it’s a Garden City water flowing from the tree of life, trees that bear fruit in every season, the throne of God. Above all of that, it’s an image of harmony between the creator, the human beings made in his image and the rest of his creation. That, to me, is the profoundly exciting vision to look forward to.

Luke Roush: And that’s powerful. So if you can’t see the vision. So let’s continue on that theme. And just trying to borrow and learn from what scripture tells us next five or ten years, what would you want to see Faith Driven Investor doing in this space and what could environmentally conscious investments look like in the world? We talked about some of those for you guys that you’re seeing, but just cast a vision maybe for the broader community.

Tim Macready: There’s so much stuff I’d love to see. First thing I’d love to see is wrestling with our responsibility as stewards. And cultivators of creation more, I think I’m really excited that as Faith Driven Investor as a movement, we are waking up, we have woken up to the influence that our investments can have on human flourishing, on training people with dignity and respect. And I think is a powerful message when we do that as Christian investors, when we invest in ways that are financially excellent, but also show that we value people, we testify to what we believe. We testify to the fact that every human is made in God’s image, equally worthy of dignity and respect. And we testify to a world that’s watching to the beauty of God’s way, of looking at the world. And I see so much potential with the way that we look at investing and creation as well, that as we embrace this idea that we are not just users and consumers of creation, but cultivars and stewards of it because of its beauty and because of the importance of creation in sustaining and preserving human life and human flourishing, we testify to the awesomeness of God as the creator. And so the first thing I want to see is us just wrestling with what creation care looks like and not doing it in a way that idolizes the creation. Doing it in a way that remembers that man is made in God’s image and that we have been given a mandate to use the resources of creation for the benefit and flourishing of human thought at the extremes of the environmentalist movement. Start to talk about the human extinction and this hope that one day humans won’t live on the planet because in their view, we’re bad for the planet. We’re destroying it. Well, that’s not the picture that God paints, paints a picture of. Mankind is good for his creation as causing it to flourish, as shooting it well. And then in a real practical sense, I’d love to see Christians at the forefront of environmental innovation in the way that we’ve been at the forefront of social innovation, I think as Christians, as exciting ways in which we could be at the forefront of innovation in ways that promote human flourishing and creation care simultaneously. Imagine what cheap, clean energy can do for millions of low and middle income people, billions of low and middle income people in Southeast Asia and in Latin America and in Africa. Instead of seeing this as constraints of how we won’t produce energy, let’s take the opportunity to be creative about how we do produce energy. Let’s think about how we use water and air and the resources that God’s given us in ways that absolutely relentlessly pursue human flourishing and creation simultaneously. And I think that’s something, as Christians that we can bring to the debate, not that we idolize creation, but that we value it as made to reflect God’s beauty and support human beings made in his image.

Luke Roush: I think it’s compelling. I think that oftentimes people kind of come back to Genesis one twenty eight on what does it mean to subdue the Earth. But I just as you were talking, I kind of reread it, God bless them, and said to them, be fruitful and increase in number. So we’re not intended to actually like, you know, the problem isn’t more people fill the earth and subdue it, rule over the fish in the sea. The birds in the sky are for every living creature that moves on the ground, which establishes man’s primacy within God’s creation. But within this space, he wants us to be the rulers and administrators. But it’s not exploit the fish in the sea and the birds in this kind of exploit. It’s actually rule over. What does it mean to rule over to me that kind of governance, which is something different than exploitation. So I’m kind of just rereading something that I’ve heard quoted by maybe folks that might disagree and just trying to understand what did God really intend.

Tim Macready: I think people are not the problem here. People are the solution. This idea that we do with God’s creation by reducing the human population by voluntary human extinction, that’s not God’s picture. But the picture is of people exercising stewardship, governing God’s creation in ways that are mutually beneficial for humanity and for everything else that God created.

Henry Kaestner: Tim, you’ve made a better theological case than anybody that I’ve heard thus far. I’m interested in the Matt Chandler podcast series, the sermon series you mentioned, but you’ve made a very good case about the overall the pragmatic make it a little bit more granular for us. Are there some specific innovations, technologies that you have seen that have required investment capital along the way that give you some excitement about, you know, this is super cool, bunch of people focused on maintaining the engineer, the artistry, the beauty of God’s creation. And with these different technologies, I’m encouraged that we’re going to be able to maintain this beautiful tapestry that’s all around us.

Tim Macready: And one of the things I found really neat is when we find ways of using the resources that God has given us, when we find new uses of products and resources that were previously just kind of negative, I think about tobacco. Does abundant evidence that the way that we’ve been using tobacco to smokers is severely detrimental to human flourishing? And yet God gave us the results of tobacco. And in the last decade, we’ve discovered other uses of tobacco as an alternative fuel substitute through crop based fuels that are actually using what God has given us in a way that Stuart’s creation will and doesn’t cause severe damage to human flourishing. I find it really neat and cool the way that alternative meat substitutes are being developed. And I say this to someone who, when I saw this coming out, was persuaded about the potential environmental benefits of them. The environmental impact of the scale of industrial meat farming that we have in the world today is quite significant. And I have friends who are vegetarian for that reason. I think God in Genesis and then again in the New Testament gives us animals as food. But I think the scale at which we’re consuming them is potentially problematic. And so I get excited. I was someone who when these alternative meats started coming out, I thought, that’s not viable. There’s just something too good about cutting into it and enjoying the beauty of God’s creation in a state. And yet I find myself choosing these not infrequently, these alternative meats because they are good for me and they taste good and they feel like meat. And I find that kind of stuff really cool. And so I’m looking forward to the days when we can find ways of using things that are potentially right now damaging God’s creation in ways that actually enhance it. Because I think when we look at what God has created and what God has given to us to use for our joy and for his glory, we see that so often the problem comes not because God gave us a bad gift, because, of course, as Jesus is a heavenly father doesn’t give us bad gifts, but because we found ways of using that gifts that are damaging to us and to his creation. And I find it really cool when we rediscover ways of using God’s gifts that support human flourishing and creation care.

Henry Kaestner: Tim, as we get ready to close out and Luke, we’ll do that for us here in a second. I want to ask you a question that’s been on my mind in the minds of our listeners a lot recently as we’ve started exploring this concept of faith driven giving as well alongside Faith Driven Entrepreneur and Faith Driven Investor. Is there a cause? And it could be very much within creation care. We can stay on that topic if you like, but is there a cause that you and I enjoy giving to where you see God at work and just become more alive? Because your ability to give to a particular ministry or charity

Tim Macready: one of the ministries that God has brought us into contact with recently, and this is very specific to Australia, is a group called Common Grace. And Common Grace is a I mean, the term comes from this idea that came out of the Reformation that God’s good gifts are given to everyone. They are given to the people who recognize God’s generosity, and they give in to the people who don’t recognize God causes the rain to fall on both the righteous and the Praxis. And there’s a movement in astronautical Congress that is it’s about pursuing Jesus and justice. And so they work for reconciliation. Australia has a significant challenge in that when Western settlers came to Australia, they displaced quite violently Australia’s indigenous people and caused a centuries long rift between indigenous Australians and Australians who have arrived and lost two hundred and forty years. And the common grace pursues reconciliation between indigenous Australians and the Australians who’ve come more recently. They pursue justice for indigenous people who have died in custody, but they also. Pursue action to steward God’s creation. Well, I want to touch you on an issue that I know is going to be controversial, and I know you might cut this out. And that’s OK. I want to talk about climate, because if the consensus scientific projections are accurate and I accept that from many of our listeners, that is a big if. But if they are accurate, then the changes to our planet are going to be very damaging. And Henry, people like you and I can sell our houses and move to higher ground. We can build more tornado proof basements. We can protect ourselves from the damaging effects of climate change if it happens. But the vast majority of the world’s poor cannot. If sea levels rise, there are tens of millions of people in Bangladesh who will be displaced if hurricanes and typhoons increase in intensity. There are hundreds of millions of people in Southeast Asia in low lying areas of Southeast Asia, in low lying Pacific islands and in coastal areas of Africa and Latin America, who cannot just move to a new house, whose lives will be thrown upside down. And I think we need to take that seriously. I think the consequences for the people who are made in God’s image if we are wrong about climate change in the wrong direction, and I think we need to wrestle with that, I realize that there’s significant ways in which the debate and the argument around climate change is being shaped by forces whose worldview is not our own and is being significantly driven by an agenda that we would not support. But I think we’ve got to ask the question of what the implications are if we get this wrong. And so back to your question about one of the areas in which we give one of the things I love about human rights. This organization that we’ve started to support recently is that it weaves together justice for people and care of creation in a way that I really resonate with. It weaves together this idea of proclaiming the gospel in word and proclaiming the gospel. Indeed. I’m really excited to come across as Australia’s first Christian organization working in this area that’s actually led by an indigenous Australia. And that to me is really cool. And so that’s the cause that we support. And at the same time, I’m passionate about global mission. We’ve got missionaries we support in France in different parts of Africa, in Papua New Guinea. I’m passionate about the work of Christians here in Australia, in working against homelessness and working against domestic violence. And there’s a whole bunch of things that I’m passionate about. But the one that ties into what we’ve spoken about today is this common grace movement, which I just encourage our listeners to look up. It’s unique to Australia, but I think the way that they’re approaching reconciliation really points to this idea that God’s work, that Jesus work on the cross was about restoring relationships between people and God, between people and each other and between people and the rest of God’s creation.

Luke Roush: That’s a good closing quote. We also like to close each episode by hearing what God is teaching you right now. So, Tim, what have you found in God’s word that has stuck out to you recently?

Tim Macready: So I’ve been really wrestling in God’s word with what pursuing first and foremost a relationship with him looks like. I understood many years ago, through God’s word, through some great mentors, through other readings that I was doing, that my work was not found in what I do, but in who I am. And I understood that. And I tried to live that. And I struggle as someone who is very passionate about the movement of Faith Driven Investor. And I see the work that we’re doing here as so important to capturing hearts and showing how winsome the gospel is. And so I work passionately, and yet I need to find my purpose and my identity not in what I do is part of this movement or any other movement, but in doing as meaning God’s image. But over the last 12 months, I’ve been reflecting in God’s word and in my readings more deeply on what it just means to rest in him, to accept that the role that I have to play in this movement and in the other parts of God’s work that I’m involved with is not because God needs me, but because one of God’s many gifts to me is the privilege of being involved in the work that he’s doing in the world. And it’s just changing the way that I think about it. It’s giving me more patience because I know that this is his work, not my work. And it’s giving me more appreciation for the privilege of being involved in his ministry. And I would always have said it’s a blessing to be involved. It’s a privilege to be involved in God’s work. I would always have said God doesn’t need me to do his work. But as I’ve wrestled with a bunch of things personally, questions about where God wants us living, questions about what loving my family looks like, questions about what investing into my kids looks like at this point in their lives. I’ve just come to a deeper sense of peace and patience about the work that God is doing and just the immense privilege that needs to be involved in that. To have conversations like this, God could just as easily be using twenty fifty one hundred thousand other people to do this work. And yet he lets me be part of the work that he’s done and that causes me to slow down. It causes me to reflect with joyfulness on the beauty and the generosity of African.