Business Fellows – The Praxis Journal

 Photo by  Praxis

Photo by Praxis

The Business Accelerator program includes the Praxis Redemptive Investing Gathering, convened in San Francisco as the conclusion to the second program gathering. Fellows share their visions for shaping culture through their ventures and build relationships with 150+ investors as a part of a two-day redemptive investing event hosted by Praxis.

This year’s presentations included smartphone-based, at home urgent care as well as jewelry that inspires its makers and its wearers. There’s also a pitch about hotels that support meaningful causes and a personalized relationship counseling app. But that’s only to name a few!

You can see the list of Business Fellows in its entirety, as well as watch their presentations, by going to The Praxis Journal today.

The Praxis Business Accelerator

A mentorship-driven program, the Praxis Business Accelerator equips top ventures as they seek the redemptive edge in their industries. We accept just 12 startups, with up to two leaders per organization. 

We believe that Christian entrepreneurs who are spiritually serious, culturally astute, and in community have a unique ability to build a better society and demonstrate the beauty and goodness of the gospel across all of life. Christian founders typically have a hunch that they are called to a more comprehensively faithful approach to their work of venture and impact creation. However, the aims and practices of such an approach are unclear and seem more like fleeting feelings or reactions than a determined pursuit of a narrow way. The Praxis community seeks to help entrepreneurs operate more fully through a redemptive lens, all while being serious about the growth of their venture.

The program is built upon a deep examination of redemptive strategy (the venture’s expression and impact in the world); redemptive operations (its functions, processes, culture, and partnerships); and redemptive leadership (the founders’ character, motives, imagination, and practices).

Learn more about the Praxis Business Accelerator on their website.

The Theology of Financial Accounting by Jerry Bowyer

The first treatise on double-entry bookkeeping came from the mind and pen of Luca Pacioli.  If you’ve ever wondered why there is a system of accounting software named after a Renaissance era mathematician, now you know.  But he wasn’t just a mathematician; in fact, he was not even mainly a mathematician. He was mainly a member of a religious order, and a theologian. His development and refinement of the modern system of financial accounting was not mere mathematics; it was a subset of his theology. And that actually makes a lot more sense than it might seem to on the surface, because at bottom, financial accounting is a moral science. It is the science of stewards telling the truth to the owners towards whom they have an ethical obligation to give an account. The fundamental equation of double-entry bookkeeping is ‘assets – liability = capital’, which is really just an algebraic representation of a moral truth: Once a corporation has discharged its debts, whatever remains goes to the owner.

Stating the equation a little differently illustrates the principle a little differently: ‘Assets = liability + capital’, which is to say that everything a company owns represents either an obligation to a creditor or back to the owner.

If this sounds theological to you, that’s not your imagination. Much of the Bible is written with the steward/owner mindset in the center. Israel was seen as the steward of God’s land, of His law, even of His name.

Jesus’ parables quite often center around the relationship between steward and owner. Paul’s letters repeatedly invoke the idea of stewards who hold assets in trust. “… It is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful.” (1 Corinthians 4:2 KJV). Quite a bit of the Pauline epistles are taken up with matters of accounting: Alms to be collected, accounted for, and distributed from the church of one city to the church of another city. This was something quite rare in the ancient pagan world and required new forms of financial accountability. Creating a mutual aid and welfare society on a network basis, rather than one like Rome’s top-down welfare state, was a financial innovation of incredible importance.

Dr. John Thornton, in addition to being the author of Jesus’ Terrible Financial Advice, is a CPA, a professor of accounting, and the head (steward) of a charitable fund devoted to improving accounting ethics at Azusa Pacific University. One of his areas of research specialization is looking at why accounting firms get fired. He found that the chief reasons were corruption and incompetence. It was only after the data led him to that conclusion that he learned that his favorite accountant in the Bible, Daniel, was one of whom it was said that his critics “could find no ground of accusation or evidence of corruption, inasmuch as he was faithful, and no negligence or corruption was to be found in him.” (Dan. 6:4 NAS)

For Thornton, accounting formalism is not enough to keep the system honest. Character was needed. There are never enough rules to force people to be honest, so you need to find honest people to do the work. Even corrupt people, Thornton says, want non-corrupt people handling their money. The ultimate sanction for Thornton is the final judgment when each person ‘must give an accounting for things done in the body’. “I know I lied, but I still followed FASB,” will not cut it on that day. Only a culture of truth can produce an accounting system which fulfills its moral obligation to shareholders. And only an accounting system that gives decision-makers the truth will efficiently allocate capital and promote human flourishing to its potential.

Thornton makes a very powerful point about the double-entry bookkeeping system: It forces leaders to see things from multiple perspectives. Each entry must balance. There are no single entries in double-entry accounting, which means that there are no entries which permit the financial managers of an enterprise to focus only on one side of any transaction. If an asset is purchased, then the asset is recorded… But so is the decrease in cash which went to pay for it. The decision-maker is literally forced by the mathematics of the method to ‘count the cost’. If the asset is bought on credit, then a liability account must be credited. The Venetian method changed the world, and for the better, back at the very origins of capitalism in the Renaissance period. In fact, that method helped make capitalism possible, because it facilitated the separation between ownership and management. Assets could be pooled among wide swaths of people and they could know that if the method of accounting was followed, they would know exactly where their interests stood. This made scale possible, and not just for the already wealthy. As Thornton said to me, double entry bookkeeping “changed the world.”

I recently sat down across a Skype line with Dr. Thornton to talk about the theology of the Bible and how it affects (and effects) the accounting system on which our world runs. You can listen to that interview here.

Three Trends in Impact Investing by Impact Foundation

 Photo by  Kimmy Williams

Photo by Kimmy Williams

Impact Foundation exists to invest charitable capital for economic, social, and spiritual transformation, our version of impact investing. It’s the next iteration of philanthropy because innovative foundations and givers have recognized that all enterprises, not just charities, can produce both social and financial results on a spectrum from positive to negative. While we whole-heartedly believe impact investing is here for the long run, not everyone lives every day in this world. That’s why we bring you this summary of the most important conversations in impact investing. 

If you’re new to the conversation and just wondering what the words mean, check out the FAQs and Resources and on our website.  

# 1. DEBATE OVER RETURNS

Is it ever okay to accept less than market-rate returns for the sake of achieving more impact? Some say that doing so is just an excuse for mediocrity. Others point out that reducing global poverty through job creation requires patient, friendly capital that can pave the way for traditional investors to enter the market. 

Read more in Stanford Social Innovation Review article, “Marginalized Returns

#2. GETTING SERIOUS ABOUT MEASURING IMPACT

The Global Impact Investors Network recently published its first study of impact measurement practices. (Sounds boring, but we read it so you don’t have to – you’re welcome). This survey of over 120 impact investors demonstrates two important ideas:

  • investors care about measuring the impact, and

In a survey of 208 impact investors managing more than $118 Billion, nearly 100% of respondents measure the social and environmental performance of their investments. GIIN Investor Report.  The primary motivations for tracking non financial metrics are to better understand and to proactively report impact. Interestingly, the desire to manage or improve impact came in third. GIIN Measurement Report

  • no one has it figured out. 

Jean Case, Chair of National Geographic Board of Trustees and CEO of the Case Foundation, says it well in SSIR

At present, public data collection and management practices are implemented too haphazardly. Even in instances where a company or an investor has shared some data, a lack of clear industry standards for categorizing it hampers consistency from one platform to the next.

Should we measure inputs, outputs, or outcomes? Is IRISGIIRS, PULSE, IPAR or some other tool right for a given application? I find it overwhelming and confusing and this is my industry. Just like the development of GAAP has done for management and finance, impact investing needs its Generally Accepted Impact Measurement Principles. 

#3. INCREASING USE OF UNITED NATIONS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

In 2015, the United Nations unanimously adopted a set of goals, called the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to end poverty and contribute to improved communities by 2030. The SDGs represent a simplified way for investors, donors, and enterprises to communicate the outcomes they seek. This simplicity and breadth accounts for the relatively quick adoption of the SDGs (42% of impact investors use the SDGs two years after they were adopted). GIIN Measurement Report.

Toward A Practical Theology Of Capital (A Layman’s Version) by Impact Foundation

 Photo by  Jez Timms

Photo by Jez Timms

Impact investing from a Christian perspective necessitates a deep understanding of what the bible says about the issues involved – namely, how to invest, where to invest, and for what purpose. Seems obvious as I write it, and yet prior to last week, “develop a workable theology of capital” was nowhere near the top of my to-do list.

We’re far from expert at this stuff, but we at least want to enter (or start) the conversation. A 15-minute Google search suggested this isn’t a conversation happening very many places yet.

There’s a lot out there about topics related to theology of capital: 

But none of these quite address the questions related to what the Bible teaches about investing financial capital. Questions like:  

How much return should we expect (is the idea of extracting a 45% IRR in contradiction to the prohibition against usury or is it just shrewd business)?

Should we only invest in companies run by christians (if not, what about the admonition against being unequally yoked)?

Do we always need to seek social/spiritual impact along with financial return? Or is making money for retirement or future giving a sufficient goal?

If it’s true that God designs business as a means of accomplishing His purposes in the world, then we ought to flow upstream and consider what implications this has for the capital that is invested in those businesses.

At an event in Silicon Valley hosted by Praxis before their Business Accelerator Finale, I heard a very successful venture capital investor talk about pursuing a theology of capital that is at once fully secular and fully sacred. Fully secular in the sense that his firm wants to make great financial investments with world-class sourcing, due diligence, structure, management, and exit. Excellence honors God and also earns the right to influence for Christ company founders and other investors. This influence is the fully sacred aspect of his theology statement. 

This VC investor explained that he arrived at this idea through a month-long personal study of the book of Daniel, a story about a believer serving secular kings in a secular culture. I guess that’s where I’ll start. 

What else should I read? Who’s writing about this? Where can I look to study well on these topics? I appreciate your insights.

Proverbs 1 and the Ethics of Investing

There is more at stake in investing than the risk of losing our money. There is also the risk of losing life’s wholeness. In this video, you’ll hear Eventide CIO Finny Kuruvilla, MD PhD talk about the ethical dimensions of investing using a passage from the biblical book of Proverbs.

Watch the video from Eventide and read the full article below.

by Finny Kuruvilla

I want to take us back now, really to thousands of years from before where we’re standing at this moment, and we’re going to a very ancient book. This is the Book of Proverbs, which is a book in the bible. This particular passage is from the very first chapter of the Book of Proverbs.

Let’s read it together. It says, “My son, if sinful men entice you, do not give into them. If they say, ‘Come along with us, let’s lie in wait for innocent blood. Let’s ambush some harmless soul. Let’s swallow them alive like the grave, and whole like those who go down to the pit. We will get all sorts of valuable things, and fill our houses with plunder. Cast lots with us. We will all share the purse.’

My son, do not go along with them. Do not set foot on their paths, for their feet rush into evil. They are swift to shed blood. How useless to spread a net where every bird can see it. These men lie in wait for their own blood. They ambush only themselves. Such are the paths of all who go after ill-gotten gain. It takes away the life of those who get it.” That’s Proverbs, Chapter 1, Verses 10-19.

Well, let’s now think carefully about what we just read. The first observation that I’d like to make is to notice that culpability here is contemplated even for scenarios of mere financial participation. The passage reads, “Cast lots with us,” which basically means something like, “Put your money in with us, we will all share in the purse.” There’s some kind of common purse that this business venture is drawing from.

What is fascinating about this, is the author of Proverbs implores the son, implores the daughter, to avoid these bad profits. It’s phrased in this passage, “Ill-gotten gains,” which are profits that are made at the expense of others; profits that come from some activity that results in harm towards others.

In contrast, the biblical narrative calls us to derive our profits and our livelihood from good profits, from activities that are really the byproduct of serving well the needs of others. Thousands of years ago, the author of Proverbs was making a very simple but very profound statement that we need to be careful and not join into these schemes that are hatched by people that are about ill-gotten gain, bad profits, where there may be some kind of a common purse.

Now in fact, if you think about it, a mutual fund is in some sense a common purse where there’s one pool of capital, and the fund manager allocates out of that to various companies. We as a wise son or the wise daughter seek to avoid these schemes of bad profit in favor of the opportunities for good profit.