WeldenField

weldenfield

Firm Headquarters: Birmingham, Alabama

Date Founded: 1977

www.weldenfield.com

This Page was Updated January 2020

>
WeldenField is our brand name but we operate a number of companies in the real estate sector including construction, property management, mortgage services, development, etc. Our real estate activities include multifamily, single family, hotel, active adult, and land development. 

Investment Approach

INVESTMENT THESIS

The primary objective of the Fund is to achieve Business as Mission quadruple bottom-line returns on invested capital for value-add multi-family properties. The quadruple bottom-line for us means achieving market or near market returns while impacting all the stakeholders (employees, tenants, neighborhood, competitors, vendors, investors, etc.) from a spiritual, social and environmental perspective. We plan to leverage our industry experience to identify opportunities and inefficiencies in the market and achieve operational synergies through our property management and construction management companies. In a world of so much capital chasing every deal, we must be efficient during our execution to arrive at good returns.

INVESTMENT OVERVIEW

We plan to invest in value-add apartment properties ranging in size from 100 to 250 units. We anticipate these properties will located be in the southeast United States. We will likely concentrate on two target cities for investment by the first fund to achieve operational efficiencies and maximize spiritual impact.

Capital Raise Strategy

Strategy: Fund and Deal by Deal

Total Properties Under Management: SPM is our property management company and it manages 18,000 units. We have developed and/or acquired (value add) over 9,000 units.

Total Assets Under Management: Our plan is to raise $15,000,000 to $25,000,000 of equity for the fund. We’re still raising money.

Investments to Date: 100-250

Total Number of Investors: Over 30 different investors including high net worth individuals, family offices, and funds

Average Investment: TBD

% of Capital from Top 3 Investors: Less than 25%

Financial Reporting Frequency to Investors: Quarterly

Minimum Amount: Typically $100,000

Setup to accept charitable capital through the National Christian Foundation or other listing platforms? For our current Business as Mission Apartment Fund we are working on approval with Impact Foundation.

Focused Geographic Regions of Investment: 

  • Is all of your activity in the US? No.

    • Which states? Southeast primarily but we have also done deals in Texas, California and the northeast.

  • What countries outside of the US are you active in?

    • Working on labor accommodation housing in Dubai with Andre Mann.

Focused Industries of Investment:

  • Multi Family – New Development   

  • Multi Family – Existing  

  • Single Family – New Development 

  • Commercial – New Development

Company Differentiator:

The WeldenField Real Estate BAM Fund I is being set up with the full intention of having a kingdom impact through its activities. Fund leadership has specifically set this as a fund goal. We anticipate most of the investors will also be spiritually aligned going in, and also hope that this fund-raising process allows us to witness to other investors about what we hope to achieve and how to think about integration of business and missions. 

WeldenField is a flat organization where the executive leadership team is directly involved in all aspects of the business from acquisition, renovation, asset management as well as the spiritual integration. We believe in our key stakeholders taking direct responsibility for executing and managing the investments.

Investment Example:

WeldenField has successfully executed many new construction and value-add apartment investments over the last 10 years. In 12 of these projects we have brought on a mission focused on-site program called Apartment Life, which creates a social fabric for the communities and strives to generate gospel presentations through their interactions with residents. 

Our new fund will bring a focused Business as Missions approach to apartment value-add investing where we will proactively purchase properties that are uniquely positioned to allow us to have a kingdom impact with the residents. The evangelism and discipleship strategies will be customized for each property based on location, demographic, etc. 

We anticipate that we will own each of these properties between 7-9 years and achieve Limited Partner returns in the 12 – 14% IRR range. Rehab usually takes 6 to 12 months and stabilization occurs in 2nd or 3rd year depending on size of property and level of repositioning.

Previous or Active Portfolio PROPERTIES:

We have 12 deals under development or in planning stages. We also have 5 others under contract. These transactions include multifamily (new and value add), active adult, hotel and land development. The fund will focus on value add multifamily. We have closed on 3 value add multifamily deals in the last 12 months and have one under contract currently.


Leadership Team

  • Cumulative Leadership Experience in Accredited Investing: 50+ Years

charles V. welden, iii | principal

Chuck Welden holds a B.S. from the University of Alabama in Commerce and Business Administration, a J.D. from George Washington University School of Law, and LL.M in Taxation from New York University School of Law.

After practicing law at the Birmingham law firm of Burr & Forman, Chuck joined WeldenField, a Birmingham-based family real estate company. He focuses on alternative investments and real estate opportunities that include both acquisition and development in multifamily, single family, hotel, active adult, and land. He currently serves on the Board of the Alabama Wildlife Federation and the National Christian Foundation of Alabama.

Chuck and his wife, Lauren, reside in Birmingham, Alabama. They have four children and five grandchildren. Lauren is from Hattiesburg, Mississippi. They attend Third Presbyterian Church. Chuck and Lauren have visited over 14 countries while working on missions and/or Business as Mission. Chuck enjoys tennis and most any hunting or fishing adventure–his favorites are gator hunting and redeye bass fishing. Lauren enjoys investing in others, especially younger women and children. She devotes time each week to Discovery Club where she leads a Bible study for elementary age children in urban schools in the Birmingham area.


robert c. field | principal

Robert Field earned a B.S from the University of Alabama with a major in Accounting. He was a CPA in the Washington office of Arthur Andersen prior to returning to Alabama. Robert’s responsibilities have included the daily operations of Corinthian Mortgage Company and Highland Mortgage Company prior to the sale of these assets. In addition to other duties within the WeldenField organization, Robert serves as the Chief Financial Officer for Southern Hospitality Services, LLC.


w. Edgar welden, jr. | principal

Ed has been involved in the Section 202, PRAC, and Section 8 programs of HUD for over twenty years in his role as Manager of SPM, LLC. Additionally, Ed has been involved in the refinancing and redevelopment of numerous 202 Properties through the use of bond financed, tax credit, FHA financing and also with new construction of Senior Housing with HUD through the PRAC program.  Ed also served as Managing Partner of Interactive Video Technologies, LLC.  Ion247 focuses on video monitoring as well as the installation and service of Security Cameras, Access Control, and Alarm Systems at communities and business in the Southeast. Ed graduated from the University of Alabama in 1991 with a B.S. degree in Commerce and Business Administration from the University of Alabama.  Ed is involved in such organizations as the Monday Morning Quarterback Club and the President’s Cabinet at the University of Alabama.


william B. welden | principal

Bill currently serves as President of SPM, LLC. Over the last 40 years, SPM has evolved into one of the most respected and innovative property management companies in the industry. As President, Bill provides strategic leadership and operational oversight for SPM and its affiliated companies.

Bill works closely with property owners and SPM’s management team to enhance client relations and to achieve positive revenue goals and operational efficiencies. Bill has been responsible for the development, acquisition and management of more than $2 billion of multifamily assets. Additionally, Bill has served as an officer and on the Board of Directors of various multifamily housing associations, including the Greater Birmingham Apartment Association.

He holds an Alabama real estate broker’s license and has been involved in the management of over 50,000 units of conventional, bond financed and tax credit communities for the past 30 years. Before joining SPM in 1987, Bill earned a B.S. degree in Commerce and Business Administration from the University of Alabama and a Law Degree from the Cumberland School of Law.


john grady welden |

acquisition & development

John Grady Welden has been with WeldenField since May 2019 on the team’s acquisition and development projects and has managed all aspects of the capital raising, acquisition, renovation and asset management on his deals. Prior to WeldenField he worked as an acquisition analyst at Covenant Capital Group in Nashville, TN and was involved in six transactions totaling approximately $100 million in purchases across nearly 1,000 units. He received his M.S. in Finance from Vanderbilt University’s Owen Graduate School of Management and B.S. in Finance and Economics at the University of Alabama. John Grady attends Redeemer Community Church in Birmingham, AL and presented on BAM at the Lion’s Den event in 2019.


matt scarola | acquisition

Matt Scarola has been with WeldenField since April 2018. He has led four apartment acquisitions over the past year and managed all aspects of capital raising, acquisition, renovation and asset management for these projects.

Prior to WeldenField, he worked at Newmark in Florida on the multifamily investment sales team where he was involved in 28 of the teams sales across 2017 and 2018 for over $1.5 billion in transaction volume. Matt worked at Ladder Capital Finance in New York in 2016 as an Underwriter and at EY in their Transaction Real Estate department in 2014 and 2015 as a Senior Analyst.

Matt received his M.S. in Real Estate and his B.S. in Finance at the University of Florida. Matt attends Arise Community Church in Birmingham, AL, and presented on the Real Estate BAM (Business as Missions) panel at Lion’s Den 2019.


Team and CULTURE

While not complete, one of the things investors have found helpful in the past is seeing how employees, customers have reviewed someone online. As of the date of completing this out …

  • Glass Door Rating: N/A

  • Facebook Review Rating: N/A

Spiritual Integration and Impact:

Faith Driven Investing can span a wide range from high yield to concessionary returns that have a higher level of spiritual integration. Having clear expectations of this philosophy is key for the movement. Each investment is unique and you might want to select multiples but if you had to choose one quadrant that best fits your groups spiritual integration and financial performance targets … What would it be?

We believe we will be in the medium to high spiritual integration with a slightly below market rate financial return. Typically, we see IRRs for market rate value-add multifamily deals in the 14 – 18% IRR range for 5-7-year hold periods. With our investment of 1.5% – 2.0% in a “compassion overhead” fee to fund the cost of the spiritual and social mission work at each property, we believe we will be looking at returns in the 12% – 14% IRR range for 7-9-year hold periods.

Describe the Spiritual Integration Activities:

  • Our budget will include compassionate overhead to fund and leverage ministry on site and in the surrounding neighborhood. This will be accomplished by collaborating with national, regional and local Churches and ministries such as Apartment Life and Crown Financial Ministries.  

  • Each property will have a customized program for evangelism and discipleship based on the property’s location and demographics. 

  • Strategically attract certain residents, such as a church planter, to help build an evangelistic and discipleship-oriented community. 

  • We believe impact which is achieved by a sustainable, self-funding model will yield stronger results and will be viewed more favorably by the community as the transformation will be self-sustaining and a long-term strategy rather than just parachuting in on the weekends or for quarterly serve days.  

  • The Fund will seek opportunities for outreach in multiple demographic sectors. While workforce housing will be a key component of our missional focus, the categories below could all be potential impact sectors (alphabetical order). WeldenField has experience in most all of these demographics:

    • Immigrants

    • Millennials

    • Seniors

    • Suburban

    • Urban

    • Work Force

  • Community Outreach will be customized based on the community. To achieve community outreach, many of the programs below will be used to connect with the residents and provide access points to share the gospel.

    • Financial Training

    • Life Skills Training

    • Career Training

      • Resume Building

      • Computer Literacy

      • Mentor Relationships

      • Career Prep Classes

    • Evangelism 

    • Discipleship

    • Neighborhood Engagement

    • Family & Marriage Counseling 

    • Youth Programs

    • On-site Preschool Care

    • After School Tutoring 

    • Youth Mentoring Programs

Is Impact and Spiritual Integration Tracked?

  • Over the last decade, the partners comprising WeldenField Development have been involved in multiple conversations with a variety of organizations that promote and educate companies on how to effectively bring spiritual integration into their business and how to measure the impact. As a few examples, Chuck Welden was a co-author on BAM Global Congress paper on investing in BAM, authored a paper for CEF on the issue, one of the co-founders of The Birmingham Lion’s Den and National Christian Foundation of Alabama, and has invested in 30 different BAM companies and serves on the board of several of these companies. Through this involvement, our principals have been exposed to and have helped structure spiritual integration plans within these companies and others that we have consulted with. WeldenField has been a part of conversations covering strategies of spiritual integration in a wide spectrum of businesses and sectors and recognize that they need to be catered to the unique aspects of each business. We have partnered with other advisors in the field to help us think through our customized KPIs (Kingdom Performance Indicators) list. We are currently creating our own tracking tools for the Real Estate Fund based on our experience in our prior investments and activities.

Are you partnered with any other organizations?

  • The Lion’s Den

  • BAM Global Congress 2020

  • Ambassadors Impact Network (AIN) (application pending)

  • Impact Foundation

A lot of Investing Conversations look at Social Impact related to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Is there one of these that most resonates with your organization?

  • Goal 11 – We plan to create a social fabric of connectivity and inclusiveness at the properties. We are striving to provide a safe and friendly place to live where residents can feel a part of a community and be proud of where they live.


WHY The FAITH DRIVEN INVESTOR?

  • Why are you compelled to be certified and a part of the Faith Driven Investor Group?

    We have been talking for several years with other BAM practitioners, investors and leaders in the movement about starting a BAM Real Estate fund. Our views line up well with FDI. The FDI Group concepts of Steward vs. Ownership, Capital = Influence, Abundance Economy, and investing for Impact are completely in alignment with what we hope to create.

    We hope to be able to be able to connect with the larger FDI Group to gain wisdom into best practices for integrating faith and business. We believe we have a good foundational understanding but to be connected with a larger group of business and real estate professionals will advance our thinking and impact.  

  • Does the leadership align with the Unifying Principles on Faith Driven Investor and agree to the Code of Conduct? Yes

  • Who nominated you to be listed on the FDI site? Henry Kaestner & Luke Roush, Sovereign’s Capital

AFFILIATIONS- Are you a part of any third party groups, affiliations that you would like to list here?

  • Co-Founder of The Lion’s Den 

  • BAM Global Congress speaker and co-author of white paper

  • National Christian Foundation of Alabama Board Member

  • NMHC – National Multifamily Housing Conference

  • NAA – National Apartment Association

  • Board of Director seat on multiple BAM companies:

    • Turaco Insurance 

    • Polygon China

    • Sseko Designs


Learn More

  • Key Contact Name: Charles (Chuck) Welden

  • Phone: 205-790-0523

  • Email: chuckw@weldenfield.com

  • Mailing Address: 3010 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, Alabama 35233

  • LinkedIn: N/A

  • FB: N/A

  • Twitter: N/A

Mutual Funds and ETFs

There are increasing opportunities for everyday investors to invest in mutual funds and ETFs that seek to provide kingdom impact alongside market-rate returns. Some of these funds may deploy a negative screen strategy by actively working to exclude investments that go against Biblical values (e.g. gambling, adult entertainment, abortion). Other funds may incorporate positive screens which look like investing in or over-weighting companies that actively promote redemptive practices. 

Below are a few of the mutual fund and ETF providers in the industry that explicitly identify as faith-aligned firms. This is not an exhaustive list of companies or funds, nor are these investment recommendations. It is also important to keep in mind that there are also many secular fund families and asset managers with Biblically Responsible funds, Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs), or other solutions you might be able to consider. Be sure to research possibilities with your financial advisor or investment professional. 

This is just a place to start. Learn more below and on these firm’s websites, and consult your advisor along the way. Most importantly, get on your knees and invite God into your stewardship journey.


Faith Driven Mutual Funds and ETFs

Sovereign’s Capital

Go beyond negative screening by investing in companies with exceptional cultures that enable employees to flourish. Sovereign’s Capital invests in public companies led by faith-driven CEOs that are seeking performance and impact.

Eventide

Eventide Asset Management, LLC, is a Boston-based investment adviser pursuing “investing that makes the world rejoice. Founded in 2008, Eventide’s vision is to serve individuals, financial advisors, and institutions by seeking to provide high-performance investments that create compelling value for the global common good.

Crossmark Global Investments

Crossmark offers Steward Mutual Funds, which utilizes a proprietary screening process that provides investors with competitive investment returns without compromising personal convictions. Crossmark Global Investments is an innovative investment management firm founded in 1987 and headquartered in Houston, TX. They provide a full suite of investment management solutions to institutional investors, financial advisors and the clients they serve. They have a multi-decade legacy of specializing in values-based investing strategies for clients.

Guidestone Financial

Since Guidestones beginning in 1918, the company has existed to serve those who serve the Lord “with the integrity of our hearts and the skillfulness of our hands.” Guidestone is committed to equipping ministry-minded individuals, churches, mission-sending organizations, universities, hospitals and other ministries with solutions and services that promote financial, health and spiritual wellness — all while honoring the Lord.

Timothy Plan

In 1994, Timothy Plan pioneered the first pro-life, pro-family screening standard. Their commitment, first to the Lord, is that they will not invest a single penny into any company that violates their screens. Selecting a mutual fund should be about more than its rate of return—it should also be morally responsible. Timothy Plan’s mission is to enable you to invest in a manner that combines both of these objectives.

Vident Funds

Principles–Based Investing is an investment decision–making framework that combines timeless wisdom, sound knowledge of economies and investments, rigorous global research, and an in-depth evaluation of risk dynamics. This framework is the underlying philosophy which guides decisions and the foundation of Vident’s investment process.

Praxis Mutual Funds

Praxis Mutual Funds is the mutual fund family of Everence Financial, a comprehensive faith-based financial services organization helping individuals, organizations and congregations. Praxis Mutual Funds believe God calls us to be just as concerned about the impact of our investments on others as we are about the financial returns we receive. They help advisors and clients put their faith into action through financial decisions that are motivated and informed by faith convictions. 

Inspire

Inspire believes you should be proud of the investments you own. That means investing in quality companies from both a financial and values-based perspective. Inspire seeks out above average, “best in class” companies in redemptive categories and also carefully screens out companies with activities counter to biblical values.

One Ascent

OneAscent Investments is a registered investment advisor that manages a variety of Values-Based investment strategies designed to help investors live aligned with what they value most. OneAscent’s broad suite of investment solutions includes Funds, Turnkey Models, Individual Strategies and Retirement Portfolios that combine a disciplined investment process and a commitment to Values-Based Investing.

Ronald Blue Trust Access Portfolios

Ronald Blue Trust advisors apply technical expertise and biblical wisdom to help clients make wise financial decisions to experience clarity and confidence and leave a lasting legacy. The Ron Blue Trust Access Portfolios are Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs) that offer clients solutions tailored to their personal goals and values. These tax-efficient customizable portfolios offer many advantages, including opportunities for corporate engagement through proxy voting and representation in the boardroom. If desired, this solution also allows investors to exclude companies from their portfolios using a menu of values-based screens. This is all possible via a technique called Direct Indexing which transitions a portfolio to hold fewer funds and more individual stocks. 

Knights of Columbus

With a commitment to the socially responsible investment guidelines set by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), KOC offers clients a way to invest with integrity, assured that their funds are invested with companies committed to sound ethical, environmental, social, and corporate governance practices. That’s how they provide “value with values”– by helping clients grow their future with faith-based investing.

Ave Maria

Ave Maria Mutual Funds is a U.S. mutual fund family that targets clients interested in financially sound investments in companies that do not violate certain religious principles of the Catholic Church

Faith Investor Services

Aligning investment portfolios with religious values. Faith Investor Services is committed to driving positive results – for the firm, for its people, and for its clients. FIS believes that having the best team positions them to meet the needs of its clients, and to have the best team, its people must bring a range of perspectives to the table and reflect the diversity of the communities where we live and work.

Please consult your financial professional before making investment decisions. Nothing on this website shall constitute or serve as an offer to sell products or services. For informational purposes only. All information is given in good faith and without warranty and should not be considered investment advice or an offer of any security for sale.


Know of another group that should be added to the list?

Send it to our team and we’ll send it to our editorial team to consider adding to the site.

Episode 99 – Tom Darden: No Exit Investing

Subscribe to the Podcast:

Tom Darden is founder and CEO of Cherokee, a private equity fund which focuses on financial, environmental, and social returns for investors and communities. Cherokee has raised over $2.2 billion in five institutional private equity funds, and invested this capital in the acquisition, cleanup, development, and sale of approximately 550 environmentally contaminated real estate assets in the US, Europe and Canada. Since the 1980’s Tom has invested in over 100 companies using a “no exit” philosophy. Tom shares more about the benefits of investing for the long haul. 


All opinions expressed on this podcast, including the team and guests, are solely their opinions. Host and guests may maintain positions in the companies and securities discussed. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as specific investment advice for any individual or organization.


Episode Transcript


Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it.

Henry Kaestner: Welcome back to the Faith Driven Investor podcast. I’m here with my partner, Luke Roush. Luke, awesome to have you. We got a special guest.

Luke Roush: We sure do. Tom Darden goes all the way back to day one. You and I together almost 10 years ago now.

Henry Kaestner: Yeah, sure, man. And for those of you don’t know, Luke and I are in different places in the country now. He’s in Nashville. I’m in California. Tom is in Raleigh. But Sovereign’s Capital and really our emphasis and calling to the work of Faith Driven Investor and started in Raleigh and Tom came along side us and encouraged us and was there at the beginning and just more than any other person outside of the three of us. Andre, Luke and I just got it. And just like it didn’t need to be sold on it. And that was really refreshing because, you know, as a time at the beginning of sirens, when we really felt a lot of headwinds, right? I took his two and a half years, raised $12 million.

Luke Roush: Oh, my goodness. Oh my goodness. The level of hubris that we exhibited and also the level of rejection that we experienced was

Henry Kaestner: I was just thinking about the rejection part. I don’t know about the hubris, but there’s probably something to do.

Tom Darden: I don’t know about the rejection for it, but the hubris that you had no hubris truly believed from the very beginning that you were on it. This was something that the world needed and you guys were the right guys to do it. So it was just a privilege and an honor to be able to watch you guys build this thing that you built and thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Henry Kaestner: Thank you. Many of our audience are going to know you. Many are not. And so what we like to do on every podcast episode is to get an autobiographical fly over the person we’re talking to. And you begin your life not so much as a Faith Driven Investor, but as a Faith Driven Entrepreneur. And we don’t need to go all the way back where you’re rebuilding British sports cars, although that would be fascinating to go into. But you know what? They start off the beginning. You grow up in a family. You grew up in North Carolina. Who are you? You can include the British sports car saying if you want.

Tom Darden: Yeah, I was born in Pennsylvania. My dad was in the Navy at the War College, and he was working on the first computer that they had. So I kind of had some technical genes, I think, from the beginning, and we lived in small towns in North Carolina. Morgan son Lenore Highpoint, North Carolina, Petersburg, Virginia. And when my dad was forty one, he quit work and went to law school. He wanted to be a lawyer and he had always wanted to be a lawyer for some strange reason. And I think I was very influenced by that. I then went to law school myself after I went to unceded college and to grad school. I studied urban environmental planning. I was very passionate about environmental issues from high school. It was an early environmental movement. It happened kind of post 60s. So I’m sixty six years old now, born in nineteen fifty five. So, you know, I was thirteen and nineteen sixty eight just to kind of give this some context. And it was a very tumultuous time. And the environment, civil rights, the Vietnam War were the big movements kind of inverted order. But the environment was on a lot of people’s minds. I was very influenced by that, just sort of feeling this sense of abject terror about pending environmental doom, which I know a lot of young people these days feel. Also, it’s kind of a sad thing to have inflicted on you. And I decided I wanted to do something about that. And I went to law school to be an environmental lawyer. I did work as a mechanic and bought a car when I was 13 and was very technical and ended up buying, fixing up and selling 20 cars or motorcycles. By the time I was age 20, that’s kind of how I made money. I was always working, doing some kind of work. Start with the paper route at age 10 and pretty driven to make money. I mean, I’d say somewhere in the vicinity of greedy. I went to law school at Yale. I didn’t like the law that much. I went to work at Bain and Company, and I did statistical analysis of the energy consumption in heavy industry. I kind of used that way of thinking about industry to buy these brick manufacturing companies that use a lot of energy and convert them to using wood waste. So biomass fuel, which saved a lot of money and that worked out well and then sort of bacteria growing company to grow bacteria for cleaning up pollution in the ground that led to creating the contaminated land cleanup business. And then let me

Henry Kaestner: stop there for just one second. We’ve never interviewed somebody who started a bacteria growing company. How did you get started? No, we haven’t. What does that even mean?

Tom Darden: Well, it really came from my background in grad school. When I went to grad school, I studied about waste treatment, different types. But sewage is processed by bacteria like people don’t know that. I mean, obviously lots of people know that if they’re in the business or involved in it, but the job of consuming and breaking down sewage and lots of other kinds of waste, it’s done by bacteria. It’s like, you know, society hires these bacteria to do this work for us. And I was overwhelmed by that. I remember in grad school, I drove my wife crazy, my wife to be crazy because I was just obsessed by this amazing phenomenon. So it’s always in my mind, and I knew that bacteria would. Consume all kinds of contaminants, and it was known that bacteria would consume contaminants in soil since it is an easy step from there. I had some contaminated land that I needed to clean up at these old manufacturing plants and I thought, well, instead of holding it all to a landfill or hiring some third party for it, we could figure out a way to do it ourselves. And I’ve got some professors at Virginia Tech gave us some money. We ended up building a business called Cherokee Biotechnology to grow bacteria. We sold bacteria to others in the remediation world, and we started a remediation company taking dirt, contaminated dirt and cleaning it up with bacteria. And then that led to being able to buy contaminated land, you know, more efficiently or not being so concerned, I guess, about buying contaminated land. We were willing to buy land if you weren’t willing to buy. And that led to creating our private equity funds. We raised $2.2 billion over about a 20 year period to buy clean up and then sell contaminated land. So anyway, that’s a little bit about kind of our background. I continued to invest in, you know, interesting technologies sort of like the bacteria stuff on the side. But then that kind of became our main focus. The thing I was doing on the side really became a primary work way, and I got three kids, four grandchildren.

Henry Kaestner: Well, along the way, you also started one of, if not the largest bread company in America, one of the larger companies in America. So you even mentioned that, you

Tom Darden: know, that was the thing I did when I left Bain and company is is a bought for brick plan sort of all together in a transaction substantially financed by a public company that needed to get out. They were losing a lot of money. And I did that because I had this plan to convert these plants to using biomass instead of natural gas, which is very expensive at the time. Gas prices spiked and it became uneconomic to make bricks, basically. These companies were losing money, but I had a plan to instead of using natural gas to convert them to using wood waste. I knew about that because EPA was beginning to regulate wood sawdust and forcing the sawmills to pay to put it in landfills where it produced methane. So it was a stupid solution. And I thought, Well, we can use that instead of fossil fuels as a fuel for the company for manufactured bricks. And so that led to an enormous cost reduction, plus a great environmental benefit. It was a wonderful thing. And then I just continued, I kept my bread companies ended up with eight brick plants and a number of distribution sites. We had a peak of about a thousand employees, and it’s great business. I really love the brick business and the teamwork and the work of the people in the brick plants.

Luke Roush: Tom, one of the things that you and I talked a fair amount about in the past is this idea of really focusing on long term and being an investor that thinks with a very different time frame than maybe the rest of the world. Can you share just a bit more on that? Why it’s important to you?

Tom Darden: Yeah, I think that it kind of relates to the question of liquidity. It’s not really the same, but I think of it as sort of in the same vein. Like, why do you care about time? You care about time because you want to have some sense that you’re going to fill in the blank? What have some money at some point in the future that you could imagine, right? So I kind of would refer to that as being liquidity. You want some predictability about your future financial state, and those are things that I think generally we should discourage in ourselves, you know, sort of from thinking that way. First of all, predictability about future financial stake. It’s kind of a fool’s errand in many ways, or it’s trying too hard to kind of get everything taken care of. Well, if I do that, then everything will be OK. You know, which obviously is not the case in our lives. I also think it greatly influences the types of investments that we do. We’re not we’re not willing to do certain things if we’re thinking about, well, how am I going to get out of this or how long is this going to last? You know, then that causes you to to have a bias toward investments that have greater liquidity. And then at least you can kind of control the time horizon in that case. You know, if you think about your capital, your investment activity as being part of your mission, part of your philosophy, part of your phase, you know, part of your beliefs, then I just feel like you should use that as the driver of what you do, as opposed to thinking more about the investment attributes or aspects of it themselves. If that that shed some light on that topic,

Luke Roush: well, and so on the topic of liquidity, you know, maybe just speak a bit as to how that has influenced your portfolio allocation between public equities and private equities.

Tom Darden: Yeah, right. Like the zero and 100 early on came to be infatuated by entrepreneurism and the effect that entrepreneurs can have or really businesses can have on people and really came to believe that business was the most important vehicle for almost any kind of social, you know, social or economic change or activity. And along the way, there were people who were nice to me or helped me or. And I just thought, I want to do that. I want to help make that happen. And you know, you could say, well, if you invest in the stock market, you’re doing the same thing, you’re providing capital to companies that end up creating jobs and doing all those great things. I’m not disparaging of that, but I wanted to do it more directly. Also felt like I had some ideas or some thoughts, or it could be helpful in that sense in a denied the premise of sort of diversification. I mean, I felt like diversification was it was sort of like not burning your boats. You know, when you cross the river, you should burn your boats because you’re in, and if you diversify, then you’re kind of not really in. And so what I would do is if I saw an opportunity or Amen in Austin or the film made sense to this, and then I would not invest in it. And the first deal that came along basically took 100 percent of the capital that I had. Well, the company did. I have almost no capital. But then after I ended up selling them, which was a big mistake, I had some liquidity and the first next deal that came along, I put almost 100 percent of it into the deal and just thought, I don’t want to kind of create a portfolio per se. I want to use this specifically productively in terms of some objective. And so that kind of takes you out of the public markets mentality of having a diversified portfolio about I so never buy any public stock, mutual funds or bonds. None of that stuff. And I pretty much kept to that bell. I have bought stock in public companies, so I went on the board of the board for public companies over the years and about stock in those companies while I was on mutual funds, bonds, stocks, any of that stuff. This publicly traded concept, I’ve got a four one K that is allocated that well,

Henry Kaestner: it seems, from having known you for the last decade or so that part of what drives you to is relationships. I think back, you know, we’ve had Pete Oakes on the program before. We’re good friends with a bunch of the folks that you’ve been in relationship with, and it seems that you get a lot of joy. I’m going to go back in a little bit and I’m going to talk more about what you do invest in. But my sense is that there are a lot of relationships that you’ve had the impact on and have had a big impact on you. Can you talk to that personal aspect of private investing?

Tom Darden: Yeah, I think it’s really, really important that for a lot of us, you know, our primary friendships are primary relationships from people that we work with. And I’m not a particularly social person. I tend to be fairly introverted, but I have very close relationships with the people that I work with, either here in my office or in these kind of loose, you know, loose affiliations of relationships where we work together, like so the people that you mentioned and the opportunity to grow and and thrive and learn from these other people that you’re in business relationships with, it’s really important to me, also have chosen very affirmatively to invest in a number of young people to try to think very intentionally about, Well, how can I use capital and business or knowledge relationships to sort of create a continuing rolling on forward into the future virtuous thing? And I think that’s a really important and wonderful, wonderful thing. I’ve had some powerful experiences not doing what you said, in other words, where relationship or values were not sufficiently weighed or taken into account in a business setting. And oh my goodness, you know, you just you pay a heavy price in those situations.

Henry Kaestner: So one of the things I think that I hesitate to say saying this, but that I see some of myself in you, is that both operators came out of an experience that was born out of wanting to solve a problem in the marketplace and for you, as on the environment that you then bridge from being an operator to an investor investing in the same team, the same problem that you want to solve as an entrepreneur, you’re now solving as an investor and doing it a great scale. Two point two billion dollars is a lot of scale looking at big projects. Talk to us a little bit about that, about the impact you see, being an entrepreneur, solving a problem and being an investor and solving a problem.

Tom Darden: Yeah, interesting issue. I think the happiest and in many ways most productive times of my life were when I was in operation. I think a lot of people who ended up started a business but then ended up as kind of an investor would say the same thing and the investment side of my life, it almost became a. I don’t have to say this, but almost sort of a necessity or a mandate like what are you supposed to do? You know, you end up with some resources. Then what are you supposed to do? And I feel very called to use those resources in a way that are consistent with my faith, with my values. And so that became my job, if you will. But it’s very different than the opportunities that you can have as an operator. And I’m always counseling. People don’t sell your business. Everybody as a business ends up, you know, they all want to sell their business and they won’t sell their business because they want liquidity in the market. They have liquidity. They’re going to be trying to figure out how to get back in the same situation. They just got out of it. I may be exaggerating somewhat, but so I’m always saying, no, please don’t do that and I’ll look back. You know, I was twenty eight years old when I applied to separate companies and straight away had five hundred to seven hundred fifty people, depending on the year. We were sort of looking at me every day and say, Well, what I do, boss. And of course, you know, I was clueless. I knew about one thing which was energy kind of energy and engineering, basically how to drive this energy conversion. But I went back and I have such regrets about not having responded to what was a great opportunity to have a real impact on people’s lives and even just simple things that that I knew about. I don’t know, like personal financial management. I think about the message of Crown Ministries and Compass and these organizations that are teaching people how to be responsible with their money. I was kind of born with that knowledge. We later began to teach basic skills, you know, reading, math, et cetera, basic skills. But just some of these things that we could have done with this big, big platform access to people, then I didn’t think about that or thought, Well, you know, they just work here. But that went right. This is an important part of somebody’s life, and I wouldn’t really I didn’t respond to that real mandate. I feel like if you an operating business, you have a much better opportunity to do that. Cure investor, you’re interacting with executives in the company, but you can’t reach down.

Luke Roush: So one of the things that I’ve always found unique in some of our conversations, Tom, is both your focus on not maintaining liquidity, the long haul, but also your willingness to, you know, take dreams and big, hairy and audacious goals and be a part of some real, meaningfully risky companies that are, you know, anything but safe. And usually those two things don’t go hand in hand. Some of the people that are really long term and are highly relational are thinking about stability a bit more, whereas you’re doing that, but you’re also, you know, aggressively taking risks around, you know, crazy ideas. Maybe just share a little bit about how you’ve thought through that during your tenure as an investor.

Henry Kaestner: And give us some examples of those crazy ideas. Sure.

Tom Darden: Well, I mean, you know, I guess the craziest of them would be age, which originally was was named industrial heat, and we now referred to it as h. But that’s our fusion research project, where we set out to try to gather as many leading minds who were working on a particular type of fusion sort of quantum level fusion or, you know, very fusion at a really tiny level as opposed to the big fusion initiatives, just to see if there was a way that we could create energy from nuclear fusion using hydrogen instead of radioactive material as fuels. And you know, this is like a crazy thing to work on and certainly is is an enormous risk. I actually think the risk return relationship is not so bad. If you did a pure financial analysis of it, you’d say the payoff would be vast in relation to the risk. But most people just can’t deal very well with, let’s say, 100 to one or even 10 to one probability of loss. Right? Just it’s just difficult for people’s brains to deal with that. And I just wasn’t born with that gene. That said, you can’t lose money or for fear of losing money. I just didn’t have the fear of losing money. And so again, it’s kind of a burn in the boats when you cross the bridge way of thinking about things like you’re in and now you need to work as hard as you can and try to make it work. But there’s some reasonable probability that that it won’t. And let’s do it anyway. That’s been my mentality about it. After the deals I’ve been in have lost money, and at least half of those have lost all the money. So, you know, to kind of get your attention.

Henry Kaestner: Talk to us about lessons that God’s taught you about himself through your investments. Any aspect times when you felt, you know, this is I’m communing with the living guy through what I’m doing. What does that look like or do you feel that way?

Tom Darden: Yeah, it’s sort of it’s something that I’ve been thinking about increasingly or, you know, really for a long time, but. Increasingly thinking or Bill, something maybe related to that, which is how does our work, how do our acts reflect glory on God or the glory of God, let’s say. And I see that constantly in the others that I work with these relationships that you mentioned, you know, if you see what Darrell Heald is doing, if you see what Jeff’s and what just grill was, period, Pete Hoekstra Leininger, you know, you guys, you know what you’re doing. I just see God’s glory that it’s so obvious that people are responding to a calling by God. They’re not chasing their own desires, or they’re they’re managing their own desires in relation to God’s impact on their lives. And it’s a very compelling thing. I think about the stewardship. Why do I so limit those early years when I was in the bread company? And it is sort of things left undone. And it’s because of a failure to respond to that. And by contrast, I wouldn’t do that again. Now we all could do a better job. But to feel that sense of motivation and the privilege of being able to think that I have an opportunity maybe to reflect God’s glory. Think about how that affects what you do.

Henry Kaestner: We entered into a section of podcasts now that we call lightning oracle to the lightning round is powerful for times. The answer is powerful.

Luke Roush: Very powerful.

Henry Kaestner: Now it was in a way, my big takeaway before we go in the Lightning Round is that your answer wasn’t prescriptive. It was this sense of seeking out the answer and asking the question. And that’s the thing that I hope that all of our listeners are just what is it about God’s glory as manifested in my work? Am I being brought closer to him? Is it about me or is it about him? Where am I experiencing this pleasure? Just open ended questions and just asking those questions basic conscious for all of us. And then, as we mature, allows us to think about the times in our past when maybe those questions weren’t front and center for us, but maybe could have been. So thanks for being vulnerable about that. Well, you

Tom Darden: never get there. You know, you’ll never get where you wish you were or, you know, it’s a it’s a journey and it’s an aspirational journey. It’s not knowing that you’re at the destination, you know?

Luke Roush: I’m going to start off, I’m

Henry Kaestner: going to start off with lightning round. I’m ready. OK. Tom, there’s a

Luke Roush: story that’s going around about you that involves you choosing to stay in a tent at a conference that you attended. I’d like you to speak more about that.

Tom Darden: Yeah. I don’t know. I don’t know if other people do this, but I actually have a lot of these, but just stupid little like calls or mandates or things I’m going to do. And one is that I want to be sleeping outside for a week every year. Like, like, it’s not OK to have a year ago that I sleep on the ground for a week and I say that for all kinds of reasons. And so meanwhile, I go to this conference in Iceland every year and I stay outside. It’s very crowded, by the way. I mean, the lodge itself is very crowded, so rooms are at a real premium. It’s actually kind of convenient to have somebody not in the lodge, but there’s a little place in the woods outside and set up a tent out there. And I’ve seen the tent. I’ve actually stayed in the tenant more than one conference. But anyway, sometimes I travel in work and I’ll take a tent and my little airplane outside while we were playing in more than 80 per cent of airports sleep on ground the. I just think it’s a good thing to sleep on the ground.

Luke Roush: I like it. I like it. How many did

Henry Kaestner: you take on the airport hotel? Do you have that? They take on the airport hotel? I’m like, Oh, there’s one in Dallas, there’s one in Denver. And for Tom Dart and there’s one everywhere.

Luke Roush: Tom, how many times around the country and you hitchhike?

Tom Darden: Well, I mean, I’ve hitchhiked California between Texas and Canada, hitchhike from Canada to Texas to Louisiana, which I calculated I’ve hitchhiked about twenty four twenty thousand miles, just sort of summing up these trips. And I thought it was kind of interesting. I wonder one day I’m retired because I hitchhike like a bandit. I mean, I was just a fiend when I was young. I started when I was 14. My family moved from Lenore, where all my friends were that I love so much to Chapel Hill, where my dad was going to law school and I have any friends as three hour drive. And I was 14 and I’d walk out of the room, hitchhike. It was the time when people did stuff like that. My parents were wonderful parents. I was full grown when I was 13 14, and so they just weren’t that worried about sudden hitchhike up to Lenore. And then I began hitchhiking longer distances and the child to New York all over the place.

Luke Roush: Last question for me, and all of a sudden, you know, a Yale Law School student, you know, one might imagine that you were kind of straight A’s all the way through. Walk us through your early secondary educational experience, please.

Tom Darden: Yeah, it’s pretty rough. So I was begun as an athlete, and all I cared about, probably in order, was girls sports and cars, or maybe cars and sports. I’m not sure which, and I truly thought that I was going to go play basketball at Duke. I went to Duke’s basketball camp when I was a kid, so I wasn’t worried about academics and failed a couple of courses my ninth grade year and then. But I quit growing and I was six two and weighs one hundred eighty pounds when I turned 13 six to eight hundred eighty pounds and I’m six to hundred pounds today. So every year I got shorter and shorter basically as everybody around me got taller. And when I was in the 10th grade, I thought, You know, this is not working out like I got. I literally thought, I need a new plan. And so I thought, I think I’ll study. And so my next year, I was about in the middle of the class. My junior year, I was number 10 in my class and my senior year. I was number one in the class for the first quarter. And then I was. I study like a maniac when I was in college and I just got really serious about academics at that point.

Luke Roush: That’s good. Henry, what do you?

Henry Kaestner: So sold one of mine or a couple of mine, but you did give me some more material. I’m going to go back in. Well, I’ll start off with one that’s off of what you talked about hitchhiking. I mean, you hitchhike that many miles. That’s unbelievable. Thirty seconds to ask you, what’s your favorite hitchhiking story?

Tom Darden: Well, I’m trying to think of the ones that I could tell by now, here’s the thing

Henry Kaestner: do we have like a PG 13 version of the FDE? I guess you can tune in to later to hear the real answers?

Tom Darden: Yeah, I’ll tell you those later. So I get picked up by this guys in a jacked up GTO, Pontiac GTO and discern within just a few minutes of being in this car that this guy is stoned out of his. I mean, he was stoned out of his mind and he’s driving this car and he had a gun and he was not being aggressive to me, but he was kind of waving this gun around it. Just he was he was pretty crazy. And my goal, any talk to anybody who was drunk or who was using drugs which lobular these drugs at the time I wanted to be driving, I thought, I need to get behind that wheel. So how can I contort this into me, helping him out by driving the car? And eventually I told him, of course, I knew a lot about the car and knew a lot about cars, and we’re talking about cars and and all that driving. And eventually I was driving the car. So driving through the night and there’s a car that pulls right up on my bumper and it looks like a police car. You know, I’m look in the rearview mirror, it’s got Iraq, and this guy has a stash of dope in the ashtray of the car. No kidding. And he keeps reaching in and grab his stuff. But but he’s asleep at this point. So I’m thinking, I’m driving this car guy to get these drugs out of this car. And so I start reaching in the ashtray, pulling out marijuana, but also some pills and trickling it out the open window beside me until it was perfectly clean. I got rid of all the drugs that he had stuck in the console. This car? Well, I mean, I realize he’s going to wake up at some point. This guy’s got a gun, something and what am I going to do? But I have plenty of time because he slept for a long time and I finally had to pull in and get some gas. And I told him he reached up to grab his drugs and he said, Where’s my stuff? And I said, You don’t remember. And he said, no, and I said, Well, there was a car behind us. I mean, there was a police car behind pulled up right behind us. And you said, Hey, we got to get these drugs and so we got the drugs. And you know, you were really paranoid about it or whatever. He’s like, Well, how about that? That’s that’s the strangest one of the Stranger Stories.

Luke Roush: Yeah, that’s the first time for the FBI podcast dumping drugs out the car window. That’s a first.

Henry Kaestner: Yeah, it’s awesome. OK? You wrote a paper while at Yale about acid rain, which is something that actually you and I have in common. Not the part of going and getting our J.D. from Yale, by the way, but the part about the fact that we’ve both written papers about acid rain. I wrote mine in high school. So my question to you is 40 years on is acid rain more or less of a problem than it was in 1981.

Tom Darden: Acid rain is a lot less of a problem, certainly in the U.S., probably even in China. At this point, it’s a function of coal, sulfur and coal, and all power plants in the U.S. still have scrubbers. Problem with scrubbers is that they eliminate the acidity, but they increase the CO2 output so they actually cause a coal plant to have more CO2. So it’s a bit of a dilemma like you’re trading one problem for another. But anyway, so many of the specific human health type environmental problems that we were so worried about in the past have been dealt with at this point. The environmental problems are much more systemic questions about how are we affecting the micro organisms through the pollution that we’re putting in the ocean or that’s fallen on the land from air pollution? CO2 global warming Those types of pollution issues are much bigger concern to this point, I think.

Henry Kaestner: OK, I had not known about your dream in high school, but my question is related to that. And that is that knowing Luke Roush, as you’ve come to know him, does that change your perception of Duke University at all or is that just not possible? It’s not

Luke Roush: fair.

Tom Darden: No, I was a fan of Duke. I didn’t have a problem with Duke when I was a kid. I went to basketball camp at Duke, as I said, and I was a big fan of Duke, and I actually had been somewhat involved with Duke. After that, I hired professors at Duke for an engineering project to work on a waste segregation system. I was on the board.

Henry Kaestner: There’s so much they could go with there. Yeah. Given the dirty work to the Duke case, but I won’t go there. Maybe it is good. All right. Well, let me ask you a simpler one. Maybe it’s not so simple. Duke plays Carolina basketball. How do you reform?

Tom Darden: You know, I mean, oh my goodness. Yeah, a lot. No, I would refer to I would refer to a lot of but you know, I just don’t know. I’m kind of holding the thumb. If there’s a

Luke Roush: duke who was our original first connection, Tom and I named the person Henry case, and we’re turning it around.

Henry Kaestner: Oh, my. Who it that they connected you to, Tom. You’re asking me 30 seconds or less. I have. I have no idea.

Luke Roush: That person was Joel Fleischman.

Henry Kaestner: Joel Fischer Oh, yeah.

Tom Darden: Oh, well, Joel Fleischman got me my first summer internship in Washington, D.C., working for a socialist think tank. No kidding. So, I mean, he was doing what he’s doing now. One hundred years ago, approximately when I was in college, he is one of the kindest, most wonderful men.

Henry Kaestner: For those of you don’t know, Joel Fleischman may be better known. Not for I did not know about the socialist part, but he’s really known for being one of the greatest minds around philanthropy in the United States.

Luke Roush: One hundred percent.

Tom Darden: He was the guy behind the billionaire who was the book called The Billionaire, who was the guy who who built duty free shops and was a billionaire. But he gave it all the way through the Atlantic Philanthropies, all anonymously. There was this huge thing going on with all this philanthropic money raining down on the world, and it was all. And Joel Fleisher was in charge of all of that

Luke Roush: in a really serious believer, interestingly.

Tom Darden: Incredible story.

Henry Kaestner: Yeah, Tom, we’re very grateful for you. You may know that the one question that matters most to us that we would ask anybody on a podcast like this is what you’re hearing from God, in his word, in the Bible. And it doesn’t need to be this morning, necessarily. But it could be last week. It could be over the last month. But we believe that this book is alive and that it continues to instruct us. And so hearing how it impacts those who come on the program is a special blessing. What are you hearing?

Tom Darden: I want to. I want to find ways to more precisely align my work, my activities with God’s will. And so my kind of constant prayer is God, show me your will and help me bring into alignment what I do with what you would have me do. And it’s not quite the same, but kind of related, you know, how do I let my works reflect God’s glory? That’s Matthew five 16. I’m just sort of obsessed with that because I feel like I could do a better job in that regard or trying to make that more specifically clear, I guess you’d say.

Henry Kaestner: Thank you. Thank you for being our long term friend and encouragement to Luke, and I thank you for being on the podcast for sharing. Thank you for making what it would even seem to be like a layup question. A difficult one at the end. And now I understand a bit about, you know, I had a conversation recently about rare seagulls, and I shared with you about the fact that my dad’s an ornithologist, is a bird watcher and loves rare birds. And and he would take me to the sewage treatment plant growing up because that’s where the rare seagulls would come. And usually when I tell that story to people as an explanation about why I am also not a bird watcher, you’re like, you picked up on it right away. You weren’t grossed out at all, and I didn’t know why. But now I do that. It’s a big science thing, and it’s the removal of waste. Is this redemptive thing and your life’s work had been about that. It’s about what is wrong. How do we get waste off? And it has something to do with even ornithology and sewage treatment plants. So that’s the first time we’ve ever talked about that on any podcast with FDE or FDE, you went there and I thought it was a beautiful thing. Thank you for sharing with us.

Tom Darden: Hey, thank you so much. It isn’t often that I get the chance to talk about sewage treatment, but I really appreciate the opportunity. I really appreciate you have to talk to you guys because I love what you’re doing and the impact that you guys are having. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Bless you, guys.

Episode 136 – Marks on the Markets: Is the Fall of FTX the Fall of Crypto?

Subscribe to the Podcast:

FTX has fallen, taking the ‘King of Crypto’ with him. Breaux Walker, Fintech Crypto Investment Banker, and Jake Thomsen, Partner at Sovereign’s Capital join the podcast to talk about what the fall of the FTX empire means for the world of cryptocurrencies. 

Breaux and Jake dive into risk, regulation, venture capitalists, and tokenomics in this timely episode. They also tackle questions like: how can Faith Driven Investors think about crypto? What are global problems that blockchain technology is uniquely positioned to address? And what does it look like to be a person who seeks to love and serve in a place that has been defined by greed, and naivete?

Tune in to hear more, and don’t forget to subscribe for more insight from Christian investors.

Faith Driven Investor is dedicated to helping Christ-following investors, fund managers, and financial advisors proactively look for ways to use capital to impact the world for God’s glory. Get connected to other like like-minded investors at faithdriveninvestor.org/


All opinions expressed on this podcast, including the team and guests, are solely their opinions. Host and guests may maintain positions in the companies and securities discussed. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as specific investment advice for any individual or organization.


Episode Transcript


Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it.

John Coleman: Hello and welcome back to the Faith Driven Investor podcast and our monthly Mark’s On the Market Session. I’m John Coleman, your host for today and I’m really excited about the podcast today. Obviously in the news at the moment are cryptocurrencies, crypto exchanges and all types of Web 3.0 related technologies and the incredible distress that’s sweeping through the markets right now, at least partially as a result of the collapse of FTX and Alameda trading, two of the biggest institutions in that area. This is a fascinating topic. It’s a topic where there is a ton of intersection for a Faith Driven Investor in particular. And I’m really excited to introduce the two folks we have with us today. One is my guest slash co-host. One of my partners at Sovereign’s Capital, Jake Thompson, who leads our venture capital investing segment. The handsomest man in faith driven investing and a big advocate of Web 3.0. And Jake, it’s awesome to have you on co-hosting today.

Jake Thompson: It’s awesome to be here even though you’ve just lost all credibility for everyone involved here. But thank you, John. It’s good to be with you.

John Coleman: It is in audio podcast, Jake. So they’re just taking me at my word.

Jake Thompson: Fair enough.

John Coleman: And we’re excited to welcome as a guest a gentleman who’s had just a wealth of experience in this space. Breaux Walker, Breaux is the managing director at Architect Partners. He’s a partner at RJ FinTech International. He’s effectively an investment banker in the crypto space, has deep experience both in China and the United States, and a deep history in the corporate world, in startups and in finance dating back to I think, Breaux, you started your career at Merrill Lynch, if I understood that correctly, and so very pleased to have you on today and benefit from your expertize.

Breaux Walker: Thank you, John and Jake, for having me. It’s a great pleasure.

John Coleman: Well, why don’t we I mean, just to kind of jump into it, I know will break down the broader marketplace here shortly. But what the heck is going on with FTX? I think everybody is seeing this today and their founder, Sam Bankman-Fried, and how that seems to have set off just an incredible amount of distress in the ecosystem. How do you describe what’s happening with FTX right now Breaux?

Breaux Walker: So I think the background of Sam and his group and the origin of FTX, you know, you look for origin stories in companies and you look for the DNA of the team. I think no one should be surprised, having known that this group has been thriving on risk and taking risks, including leverage, since they came out of school and probably even they were playing poker in school to pay their tuition. So I think looking at the background of this company, the fact that they were enablers and merchants of risk, their entire history should leave people wondering why they didn’t consider the risks of the organization, the exchange and structure previously, and especially in terms of the fact that there were no third party regulators overseeing that risk. So this company came up this exchange came up in this group because there was Alameda Research, their trading group prior to FTX came up as a group of traders basically that were really willing to take on a significant amount of risk to be able to make additional sort of margins in crypto back in 2018 and 19. And they just continued that trend all the way up until a few weeks ago where, you know, I think people’s eyes were opened to it and to what actually they were doing. And so I don’t think there should be any surprise if someone did just like the next layer of diligence and the next layer of kind of asking of questions. But the problem was that the euphoria of the price increases and the euphoria of the market, you know, run up really as is the case in many markets, not just crypto, people sort of neglect to ask the next level of questions. And that’s my general view of what happened.

John Coleman: And to potentially mischaracterize it. I mean, part of the problem, right, was the interaction of these two entities, the exchange and the trading company, and that, you know, the exchange kind of functioned like a bank or a trading platform where you had customer assets and those customers might be lending against those assets, etc.. But it looks as if Alameda trading wasn’t simply trading on its own book, but it was actually using customer assets to trade in these risky strategies, potentially without permission, which is one of the big topics under discussion. And that, you know, for a typical investor, that’s mind blowing because you could never consider a bank doing that, for example. And yet in this unregulated space, it appears that the lack of governance within those two organizations or by regulators allowed something to happen that created this kind of systemic risk within both entities. Is that a fair characterization?

Breaux Walker: It really is. But I think to say that this is an exclusive FTX problem is really not necessarily the case. I mean, we’ve had exchanges, reputable exchanges such as Coinbase, Gemini, etc., have their own issues, not of this magnitude. They were insider internal issues or issues that would not have ever occurred at a regulated securities exchange. So, yeah, this is a larger issue, but many of the exchanges have had similar issues because they lack regulation and oversight, especially.

Jake Thompson: And Breaux, walk us through a little bit of the scene to blow up just a couple of weeks ago. Is there some crypto Twitter? And then there’s got to be some news outlets that broke the story by the beginning of the story. Goes back much further. You mentioned back 2018, but it seems that even this past summer a lot had happened. The crypto industry that started to show some of the fissures in the foundation of this space of these exchanges. You talk a little bit about maybe how some of the other headlines we’ve heard recently, how those are connected. And if you see that being indicative of a true contagion in this space, in which case there might be other shoes to drop? Or is there almost a virus in the herd? And it’s almost on calling that we guess. Where are we in that whole spectrum?

Breaux Walker: Well, the answer to that question could be very lengthy. So trade cartel, I think the rumblings about FTX have been out there for a long time and I would just characterize it under the umbrella of too good to be true or how are they making their money when their fees are so low? And we don’t know and there’s no transparency on their other business activities. So, you know, the smartest people I know in crypto and mostly the people I rely on are people come from tradfy actually people who are come from bulge bracket investment banks like the El Al Cash and Bank of America, people who actually come from traditional finance because they’re very skeptical by nature. Traditional crypto people in general are optimists and sort of can be Pollyanna. So I think, you know, this connection between Alameda and FTX really has been known in the community for a long time. It was masked under this sort of they’re a benevolent market maker mantle. But, you know, the fact that nobody talked about openly in whispered corners of crypto, in conversations, conferences, there was a lot of discussion about, yeah, this is doesn’t smell right at all. There’s something wrong here. They’re they’re making too much money and whatnot for the fees they’re charging. They must be trading, you know, they must be doing proprietary trading somehow in some way. So it’s been known and this is one of the problems with the industry, I think, as a whole, the this lack of transparency that we pride ourselves on and we say we’re open and everything. So yeah, it has a long way to go before that’s actually the case.

Jake Thompson: Well it reminds me, having been in banking back in 2007, 2008, a lot of what was going on there, subprime mortgages, where you had this assumption, well, as long as housing prices are going up, that’s going to cover over a host of sins, so to speak. And you started seeing different applications that weren’t getting all the income information and the rest. That just became more normal than it should have. But the market made it so it was okay because it kept going up. Then, of course, the Warren Buffett quote, right when the tide goes out, you see who’s swimming naked. And it seems like there’s some of that that was going on here. But I want to differentiate, too, if it’s indeed worthy of differentiation between the governance and these individual organizations within crypto and in web 3 technology inherently. Because I think we’re seeing a lot of folks are saying, see, told you. So this crypto web 3 thing is just inherently riddled. There’s no way to really make this work. Is that what we are seeing? What exactly broken? Is that really a pockmark on web3 technology itself?

Breaux Walker: I don’t think it’s […] a web3 technology itself. I think what it’s pockmark is the acknowledgment by the Web3 community slash blockchain slash crypto that individuals and some level of centralization are still individual conflicts of interest, meaning people in the middle of these technologies or platforms or, you know, just the need for some level of interaction creates this sort of level of, you know, the ability to corrupt it. Put it that way, it’s not as automagically as we need it to be and it’s not as transparent as we need it to be. So it’s similar to like A.I., where I’ve done a lot of work, some other ones. I mean, until we find a way to have a transparent sort of AI value supply chain or whatever, there’s always going to be the ability for an individual to bias or to corrupt that technology, which in its pure sense is great and web3 and blockchain. And this is like a whole. We could talk for a long time about how, you know, when somebody designs a blockchain, obviously there can be bias in there or there can be fraud designed into it after it’s set up. Yeah, it records things, you know, transparently and automagically and all that, but it can be set up for fraud or gamed in other ways. So I think the Web3 community needs to really admit that we’re not there yet. On the dream of Web3, it’s more like with all these 2.1 and 2.2 and a lot of baby steps right now. So that’s the main problem. I think challenge we have is like just being realistic with the larger community about what we can and can’t do today.

John Coleman: One, just a lot of the symptoms you’d expect to see from a potentially dysfunctional market were there and people ignored them because it had been going up. You know, it’s we’ll get to coins and currencies maybe a bit more in a moment. But I just think about all the lending that was going on. For example, even when rates were really low and you were getting a couple percent in typical fixed income, you know, you’d be promised ten or 12 or 15% sometimes lending rates on your cryptocurrency and you just don’t get rates that high without risk. Right. I mean, they were kind of promise as an almost riskless investment. And of course, that’s not true. And we’re seeing that kind of house of cards, as Jake said, as the tide goes out, really collapsing at the moment. You know, a lot of venture capitalists have been active in this space recently and a lot of venture capitalists are losing a lot of money at the moment alongside consumers. Where have the VCs made mistakes and where do you think VCs go from here with regards to Web 3.0?

Breaux Walker: Well, I think they needed to be more responsible in terms of obviously their diligence. I mean, that’s kind of an obvious statement at this point. Let’s be real. I think some of them knew what was happening, a small percentage, I’d say, and was hoping for sort of a greater fool theory to happen or that somehow these issues would work themselves out as the prices of the coins went up, the asset class as a whole. The second thing is that, you know, they needed to be more transparent about what the tech can do today, what it can’t do, its weaknesses and all of that. So I think people like, you know, A16 and whatnot got butchered a lot by the crypto community because they weren’t quote unquote purists. But you know, the point is, I think the fallout of this and, you know, Luna and all this is like there is not a pure model out there. There’s not a pure technology that exists today because any of these so-called decentralized systems or whatever can be corrupted today. And until we figured that out, nobody can stand on their high horse and say, hey, we’re decentralized or A16 is doing these sort of centralized things because everybody is centralized today. Every single project protocol is a centralized point of failure or choke point.

John Coleman: Jake, you’re investing in this stuff right now. I mean, how are you thinking about it at the moment?

Jake Thompson: Yeah. So we are not doing a ton of web3 just because we think so much of it has been characterized by a run up that is unsustainable. But we’re very, very interested in those companies that may otherwise be thrown out with the bathwater. Breaux, you mentioned kind of Web 2.1, 2.2, etc.. I think there are a lot of what folks would call Web 2.5, right? These bridges from our current Web, it’s incredible how many more of these terms we can be introducing here, but it’s not quite the totally distributed type of model. So we’re really interested in looking at the pickaxes, the shovels of this space. Right. Talk to a company even earlier today that’s trying to put together a CRM for Web three companies. Right. Because there’s not a lot of way to access all the data that’s coming on chain, those kinds of companies we’re really interested in. And it’s so unique just thinking through the lens of VC, because one of the VCs biggest dreams is a huge category, right? Where you can bet on companies is going to be a rising tide. And even if they’re holding the boat right, the boat is going to rise for a while. And while there was for my take a whole lot of FOMO that was going on and that’s just wrong and self-centered and the rest. Right. And yet we all fall victim to it from time to time. There was a lot of very rational decisions being made of saying, well, this could be even bigger than the Internet. Let’s put ourselves back to 1993. We would invest in a few companies in a category that gets so big. Well, I have much more margin for error, so I can invest in companies with slightly less governance or some issues here or there. And that’s going to be okay right now when people started turning a blind eye, to your point Breaux, I think there are a lot of issues there, too, a lot of VCs we’re making that rational choice, because if you didn’t invest right, FTX is famous for some stories where some investors would say, well, you don’t really have any board without side investors. You have no governance, right? You have no this or that. I suggest you put those things together and maybe I’ll invest in much less colorful language. They essentially said, go take a hike, right? Where the only way you can get a piece of what seemed like a leader in a category defining space wasn’t going to have governance, and you wouldn’t be allowed to have access to it if you insisted on that. So VCs were in a tough spot, but I think that’s in the calculus that might have been more rational than at first blush.

John Coleman: When it was some of this stuff where it’s like things that were almost characterizes endearing. Then when you look back were just such clear signs of disaster. I think one of the stories out of Sequoia, right, was that they were interviewing SBF, Sam Bankman-Fried about the investment and he played World of Warcraft or some multiplayer game like Fortnite or something the whole time, and they were fawning over that at the moment. And in retrospect you go, Oh my gosh, this guy was totally unequipped to run anything of any sophistication that required, you know, maturity and professionalism. I just think that that will change as well. I think the standard that will be set for founders and for the maturity of founders and for the people that they put around them, I think has got to change. And you mentioned something, Breaux, at the beginning where some of the best people in the space are actually traditional finance people now. And I have a feeling you’ll see some of that traditional finance infrastructure begin to insert itself here if the industry wants to sustain itself.

Breaux Walker: Well, it’s interesting to see at the sort of low point or recent low point of exchanges that JPMorgan has said that they’re coming in with an exchange. I mean, this is really an obvious thing. You know, if you think about the timing and what not, some people might think, well, that’s great. But no, it’s actually that’s what we need. You know, more of that from those type of people.

John Coleman: Can I pivot a bit and then I want to come back to regulation actually at the end, because I do think that you’ve mentioned it a couple of times, Breaux, and it’s a topic that we need to address before we get into that. You know, exchanges aside, most people’s exposure to this market is actually holding points, right? They may have a coin in a wallet somewhere like Coinbase, which you mentioned. They may have used exchanges, but really they’re paying attention to the price of Bitcoin or the price of Ethereum or these other coins that they may hold. You know, I think the latest stat I saw recently was that there were 21,000 different crypto coins out there. And I was talking with a friend. My personal perspective just to get this started was that we’re going to end up with kind of five or ten really successful coins out of that 21,000 and that many of them will go away. But what’s your perspective right now on the coin marketplace, which has declined quite a lot, and what you expect for the kind of short term and long term there?

Breaux Walker: Well, I don’t know if the first part of your comment was a question about the regulation, but I really want to spend a bit of time on that because I find that’s really a major malfeasance on the part of our regulators. I mean, if people are not called, you know, in on their lack of, you know, without passing laws, but at least their direct kind of confrontation of what was obvious fraud or at least kind of obviously too good to be true kind of investment product offerings, you know, to U.S. investors, you know, then that’s really a bad thing. I mean, that’s just not a confidence builder for investors going forward. Whatever else happens to SBF or happens to the private entities involved, the fact that these guys have been able to plaster their advertisements all over sports arenas and whoever missed that in the government should be fired right away. I mean, you know, it’s one thing to let them kind of act under the radar and kind of around the edges and try and get some private investors from Canada or whatever. It’s another thing for them to advertise during the Super Bowl. And, on you know FTX, so the fact that they’re going after like Tom Brady and, you know, Steph Curry, whatever, yeah, that’s ridiculous in my mind. The guys in the government, the people in the government that allowed this to happen and allow those ads to go through and didn’t issue massive fines for people basically offering securities on national TV and Super Bowl halftime to widows and orphans and, you know, across the heartland. Yeah, that that’s just unexcusable. So that’s where the anger, the, you know, punishment definitely needs to be directed in my mind, because by any other standard in the FCC or any other regulatory regime, those are the people that are kind of in. The gatekeepers and need to be responsible. So I think that’s just a major problem that they’ve somehow like as politicians are good at doing it deflected this on everybody else. But whatever happens to all the other people and private entities, they’ve got to be held accountable for the way they let this get out of hand and out of control. To investors, all this, you know, they’re going to do whatever they can do to make money as long as it’s legal. And that’s another problem. There’s too much of this stuff is not illegal today. That’s a different but related problem. So I don’t know if that’s your question, but you triggered me kind of, John, with your first part of your question, because I just can’t believe the tough law that these regulators and government have and all of the vitriol and all of the anger and everything is directed at people who were self-interested and most of them doing nothing illegal at all. Well, is that their fault? Or the people who, you know, we pay and are sitting in places of power to protect us? You know, it’s misguided right now, in my view.

John Coleman: Well, let’s finish this topic then and come back to coins. You know, one of my perceptions and Jake, I would love your reflections is that part of the challenge here is just knowing who’s in charge of regulation right. Is that the SEC? Is that the Fed? Is that the IRS? You know, there are different agencies that are involved which causes confusion. Part of the challenge is the space is so new and rapidly evolving that regulators are having a tough time keeping up with it. And then there is a I’ll call it a reported or seeming conflict where certainly, you know, Sam Bankman-Fried was the second largest donor to one of America’s political parties last year. And his parents have worked very closely with certain key regulators, running agencies right now and things like that. And there’s just, I think, a whiff of impropriety over the whole thing where there has just been a lot of money flowing around the ecosystem in the sense that politicians have been complicit in this because of that money. I mean, Jake, you know, you’ve heard kind of Breaux’s comments. How do you think about regulation in this space? What’s the problem and what’s the path forward?

Jake Thompson: I think it’s everything that you mentioned, John. It’s so complex in a bunch of ways. And you look at some of these hearings of regulators even going after big tech companies. Right. And it’s obvious that there’s not a baseline understanding of technology, of basic terms, how it all fits together. So even the number of folks that want to go after figurehead and we’re talking about centralized finance here, it’s easy to point to SBF. But then you have other organizations that are totally decentralized, right, where the owners are, those that have the tokens and vote on governance and the rest. And it is truly decentralized, which maybe would have addressed the problems we’re talking about. But if the regulators going after saying, okay, we’re going to clamp down on this or what does that look like? Right. You are the foundation that helped the launch of token but is now distance itself is very hard to find what the head of some of those are. And I think for that reason you see the regulators really stepping in much after the fact. Right. Maybe there’ll be some movement on exchanges now. But what we are seeing is movement on the ICOs that were happening in 2017, 2018, right where now we’re seeing the fallout. It’s much easier to say here are the damages. And it is amazing. And Breaux, I agree with you. Investors are going to act in their self-interest. There is some finger pointing we can do to those who just made decisions that were not rooted in common sense. Right. The number of people who are coming back and saying, well, I lost all this money who insure this in the federal government, who is there an FDIC for crypto? Who is that again? Well, no, this has nothing like that. And so it’s just such a nation industry. It doesn’t help that, at least from my perception, the average age of those that are deeply involved in crypto, it’s they haven’t seen market cycles, they haven’t been in traditional finance, right. Sam Bankman-Fried I think is 27, 28 years old. And so there is a lot that is happening fresh as an industry. A lot of people, this is their only experience in it as is really hard to wrap your arms around it.

John Coleman: Well, and it’s one place where in traditional finance what has been the standard for some time even though it works very imperfectly as we’ve seen is self regulation. Is the financial institutions actually proposing ways in which their ecosystem should be restricted to help regulators come up with the right framework? And from my point of view, I feel like that’s almost got to be the next step where the binances of the world and the coin basis of the world and others actually begin to step up and offer more constructive recommendations on what limits the industry should place on itself and what regulators should do otherwise. You’re right, Jake, they’re either going to be hopelessly behind or they’re going to become hopelessly restrictive. Right. Which would be bad, I think, for all the participants in the ecosystem.

Jake Thompson: I think you see Gensler and others that are looking to have a pretty iron hand now and roll over this. We are starting to see this is a big encouragement to me, folks like Vitalik Buterin, who is one of the co-founders of Ethereum. Right, starting to work with another leader of Binance, the largest exchanges out there to say, what does it look like? Do you have an algorithm that can audit some of these things that we’re talking about so you can push the on button and say, Yep, your liabilities, write all the Bitcoin, say or there we can actually account for Unchained. So you’re good to go? I think it will take those who understand this with the push of the regulators, not necessarily the knowledge of the regulators to be able to put something constructive around the industry. As you noted John.

John Coleman: Well, maybe to circle back to our coined topic now, Breaux, if you don’t mind looking a lot of Bitcoin or Dogecoin. Am I in big trouble? What should I do?

Breaux Walker: No, I. I agree with your sentiment that there will be far fewer coins out there. You know, obviously, most of them have no utility or simply speculative kind of gambling tokens, put it that way. So I think the ICC, you know, it’s clear that most of them are securities. They have absolutely like I said no utility. They’re simply there for people to speculate on. So I think whether by market forces or by regulatory forces, most of them will go away and we’ll get down to a very small number over time that will grow as people find new utility for blockchain and actually do real projects that are invested in and regulated. But really, those bars are very, very high. And, you know, I think the regulators will wipe out thousands of them and whatever. So it’ll be a much smaller number and then from there will grow. I happen to be after a lot of thought over the summer when and Ethereum Maximalists and I feel like it’s good for the industry and people will like this. A lot of people and you know my wife’s company [solana] I hope that she doesn’t watch this or whatever, but I feel like that’s the bet. You know, for smart contracts, if Ethereum doesn’t survive and thrive and get stronger and faster and cheaper, although, I think the rest of the industry. Yeah. I don’t have much hope for the second and third and a quote unquote Ethereum killer by now. Three years later, you know, if you wanted to kill them, you had your chances. And it’s not now, you know, they made the POS transition and whatnot. And so I think that will have a lot of sort of projects under Ethereum and different utilities around. But I consider that to be sort of the world wide web standard of crypto going forward. And I say that because there will be there will be sort of tokens underneath and projects under that, but it will all be under ethereum or it should be in my mind.

John Coleman: Jake, what do you think this flight to quality and recovery looks like? I know you’re sitting on your board eight right now hoping for a dramatic recovery in the NFT space. What do you think is coming?

Jake Thompson: No No unfortunately, not at board eight you know, I’m encouraged by a number of projects that were seemingly strong but even had governance issues. And I’ll mention one called helium that got a whole lot of press, had incredible investors from coast to coast. And the short of it is there are hardware devices all over the country. I mean, there are a million of them now. And it creates a mesh network for 5G, for Internet access, for Internet of Things. Right. The scooter going by. And it was a really neat tokenomics model. Right. And that’s just how the tokens and the business model and all the stakeholders, how it all works together. But even that, right, a lot came out as this was starting to crumble as far as policy and advertisements, even just the amount of money that went to the founders. And I’m a believer in that project, so I say that with some grace, but I think even the excellent project like that, there was some issues, some frailties that we saw that are starting to be fixed now. I’m very encouraged by the corollary of VC, where what we used to be priced most is growth and now it’s more profitability, right? It’s more unit economics. I think we’re seeing that in the crypto space so that you will see a handful of those projects that will continue on to grow as point. Maybe some are under Ethereum, some are under tokens like Solana. I’m a big believer in that layer two space, right? Ethereum, there’s still a lot of issues in terms of making it cheaper to transact on it. And there are these solutions at all. Since you take it off the dream chain, do all the transactions needed and bring it back. I think if I were investing in a token, not investing advice, of course, but if I were investing in a token and checking out of space, I think that layer two is one of the more interesting right now. But I think the space in one year will look a whole lot cheaper than it is now. And I think that’s largely the result of a forest fire. Right. Which is painful to time. It turns out it’s healthier for the forest in the longer term.

John Coleman: So I want to pivot now. This is the Faith Driven Investor podcast and I know Breaux you have been particularly thoughtful about the crypto ecosystem and Web 3.0 as it relates to people of faith. Would you mind just touching on how does a person of faith approach this market, and what do you think is good about this for people of faith? And how should we be thinking about investing in and driving forward this ecosystem?

Breaux Walker: Well, again, another potentially very long answer, because I’ve thought about this a long time. And since I came into crypto in China, where I lived for many years in 2015, 2016. So, you know, I think there’s a huge benefit to peer to peer, you know, direct to your other Christians, let’s say, or even if they’re customers. But I think peer to peer technology has a ton of applications, you know, and I think the allure of that is part of what’s driven the crypto sort of, you know, craze and whatnot. And that is that people see the benefits, whether it’s a cost benefit or actually unlocking a relationship or transaction that wasn’t possible before because there was an intermediary that would have blocked out or made that transaction impossible. So I think, you know, there’s a lot of ways to do this. I think in developed countries, let’s say in the U.S., there’s definitely ways to use crypto and blockchain for churches, let’s say, or, you know, organizations of faith to, you know, better bond their membership and to better help their membership to exchange, you know, anything they want. I would say something of value because it doesn’t have to be monetary value, but it could be books, you know, it could be Christian books, it could be anything tickets to see, you know, a certain speaker. So I think there’s a loyalty slash community building mechanism here that is very strong. It’s very private. You know, obviously, people are worried about government. More and more people are making inroads into their lives and their privacy. And so there’s a privacy aspect here that is there that doesn’t exist, but it’s more of a, you know, the idea of tokenomics in building these coins. And you mentioned, you know, I think was it Shiba or Doge or whatever is really building a sense of community around something of value. You know, people laugh. In the beginning I laughed at Doge even. But you know, these communities feel that there’s a value or values that they share and the token was just a representation of that. So, you know, it’s like, you know, just going to Disney World or whatever, does that add some long term meaningful value or whatever in your life? It’s debatable, but people would say buying the coin and sharing the coin and sending the gift, they felt they benefited in some way from it. So there’s a lot of to be taken from the doge and that shiba coins for Christians and building communities and churches and whatnot. Same thing. Even if you’re a business owner in terms of like building loyalty with your customers, you can use loyalty in crypto and blockchain is actually a very suitable kind of application as well. Obviously talking about fintech and more of a cross-border, you know, getting funds to a minister in Venezuela, for example, I mean, in Cuba where I go a lot. So I did a lot of sort of Bible smuggling and things of that nature in my youth. And I think that was the first thing I thought about, you know, in China when I lived there, I didn’t really dare much to do stuff like that then because I had a lot more to lose as a adult with kids and stuff. But, you know, the Christians in China need our support, you know, really drastically and there are millions of them. So there’s a lot of ways to flow funds and not just funds, but Christian materials, books. They’re starving for all that, you know. So I see it as a the ability to kind of go around governments that are repressive to help people. I’ll say people, but it could be believers, nonbelievers or whatever. But that to me is very exciting.

John Coleman: Jake, I want you to weigh in on this, too. But I will say the first time I felt like I really understood the appeal of Bitcoin back when Bitcoin was the next thing, whatever point version of the web that was. Jake I’m not sure. Maybe it was 1.87 or something. Was someone from a developing market who explained, Look, Americans are going to be very slow to understand why crypto currencies and coins matter because you have a relatively just society, a stable legal system and a stable currency. And he said he was from Argentina and he said, look, with the way our currency moves and the government manipulates it, Bitcoin, as much as that it’s volatile, is still much safer than our local currency. And he said, if you speak to other people in developing markets, whether it’s because their currencies are unstable, whether it’s because they live in restrictive regimes, as you mentioned, like China, where the party has clamped down and so much of people’s lives, this ability to operate independent of them and to have a financial life independent of your government does enable greater freedom for people. And certainly, as you mentioned, enables greater. Support for ministries that might be excluded, for example. So I do tend to think there’s a very redemptive purpose for this marketplace. In addition to all the community building and everything else that you talked about, and hope it doesn’t become overshadowed by some of the challenges that we’re seeing now. But, Jake, maybe if you don’t mind wrapping us on this topic, because I know you’re thinking about this a lot.

Jake Thompson: Yeah. As Sovereign’s Capital we invest, we’ve got a thesis around inherent blockchain. Technology needs to solve a core problem. Right? And so we’ve got a whole framework for that. But I’ll mention three examples. One is exactly you guys are talking about where there’s not a trusted intermediary. Right. And you need to have something that’s truly trustless. Another one would be micro-transactions, right? Where it’s too expensive to send a certain amount across the traditional infrastructure, but crypto allows do that very easily. Third, want to be where creators are creating and can be involved in some of the upside of what they’re rather than platforms taking that like we see today and the subprime what you guys are saying about how we support the church in the body of Christ globally, I think uses all those in really compelling ways. But I’d say even more motivating for me is not necessarily specific uses because I think the space is going to grow so much over time. Right. Like any startup, you kind of invest in the people first because you don’t know what the company, what the industry is going to look like. And I just get really excited about followers of Christ who are entering the space to be a faithful presence in a place that has been defined probably more by greed and a very sincere desire to love and serve. Right, but not necessarily having a strong core of why we’re doing that, what that means, but also a naivete to and believers are going in there looking to love their neighbor, to understand what God has for his creation by being able to be in places like there’s an entire group of folks who are CEOs of household name projects within crypto. And there’s a WhatsApp group has hundreds of people that are in those types of positions that you wouldn’t always know. And I just get excited about that faithful presence being out there as a space of all. So I encourage anyone to get involved as they feel called to it.

John Coleman: Well, I want to wrap today. This has been a fascinating and vibrant discussion, Breaux. We always end by asking people just what God is teaching them in their lives right now through Scripture, and wanted to give you an opportunity just to let people know what’s in your heart from what God has been teaching you lately.

Breaux Walker: Yeah, that’s a great question. So I met with a couple of friends yesterday and I’m working on helping them also with some crypto advisory and whatnot. And we prayed, you know, after talking about all the crypto stuff or whatnot. And for me, you know, and not to tie this back into crypto because I know you didn’t ask that question directly, but I think it is direct as I told the Christians in crypto group as well, you know, I really want to leverage this technology and and whatnot to really spread God’s love and that could be sending blankets to communities or food or whatever. Again, back to what I did a lot of in my youth. And so for me, it’s like the God is love message and how can we use the crypto and blockchain to really spread that love? That’s kind of what I’m praying a ton about now is not just the message, but how to manifest that, how to use the tools at my disposal, at our disposal to try and turn that into action. You know, kind of what the Lord would do if he were here with crypto and blockchain is how does he use it to spread as much love and blessings to people in need? So that’s kind of what I’ve been focused on for the last few months.

John Coleman: That’s a good word, Breaux, and a good way to end the podcast. We’re really grateful to you for spending time with us, Jake. We’re mostly grateful to you for spending time with us as well.

Breaux Walker: [….].

John Coleman: I know you guys have done a phenomenal job helping to demystify what’s been a relatively confusing space today, and we’ll see how this continues to develop. But it is really exciting right now. It’s a really interesting space and we’re grateful that you came on and shared with our listeners how to navigate it. Thanks so much.

Episode 144 – Making and Measuring Impact with Shundrawn Thomas

Subscribe to the Podcast:

Christian investors are talking a lot about impact, but we’re often left with a tough question: how do you measure it?

Author and investor, Shundrawn Thomas has wrestled with this question in his career. Over the years, Shundrawn has run a trillion-dollar global fund and recently founded The Copia Group which offers a distinct approach to investing that marries the strategic investment of financial and relational capital with the holistic development of scalable business models.

In this episode, he opens up about how his firm makes and measures impact, the ways in which investing overlaps with pastoral work, and the Chicago food staple he likes best. If you like the content, give us a rating or share it with a friend and don’t forget to follow for new episodes every other week.


All opinions expressed on this podcast, including the team and guests, are solely their opinions. Host and guests may maintain positions in the companies and securities discussed. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as specific investment advice for any individual or organization.


Episode Transcript


Transcription is done by an AI software. While technology is an incredible tool to automate this process, there will be misspellings and typos that might accompany it. Please keep that in mind as you work through it.

John Coleman: Welcome back to the Faith Driven Investor podcast. This is John Coleman and I am here with my partner in crime, Luke Roush. Luke, how are you doing today?

Luke Roush: I’m doing great and looking forward to this conversation very much.

John Coleman: Well, we’re both looking forward to this conversation because we have an amazing guest, Shundrawn Thomas is with us today. I’ve had the privilege of knowing Shundrawn for several years now. He has an amazing personal story. He grew up in Chicago, wonderful parents that he may talk about, whom I’ve gotten to hear about just an extraordinary guy who’s bought and run different businesses and ended up running Northern Trust Asset Management out of Chicago, one of the biggest asset managers in the world before, and more recently breaking off to start his own firm, an impact investing firm called Copia Investment Group. And so Shundrawn is going to talk to us about that. In addition, he’s published multiple books, one of which I have here today. Shundrawn I tried to find your latest book, Discover Joy in Work, which is excellent. Instead, I found the 2006 version of Ridiculous Faith, which has a very youthful Shundrawn Thomas on the cover. But Shundrawn, we’re so grateful to have you today and to really benefit from your wisdom.

Shundrawn Thomas: John, it’s a pleasure to be here with both you and Luke, and good to see you both again.

John Coleman: Awesome. As we dig into this, you know, a lot of the listeners at Faith Driven Investor are interested in this idea of impact investing and how that ties to faith. Just to set the table. When people say impact investing, what are they talking about in your mind? Or how do you think about impact investing?

Shundrawn Thomas: Yeah, so I’ll start with I mean, just more so in the context of our business and then maybe briefly zoom out. So when you think about it in the context of our business, the business of investment management, when people say impact investment, we’re talking about investing that involves making investments with the intention of generating a positive, albeit also a measurable societal benefit. Now that societal benefit, as you know, can be environmental or it can be social, but you’re intentionally looking to generate this societal benefit alongside obviously delivering financial returns for the business. Now, zooming out, the thing contextually that I like to say is I think this is really important. Every single business makes an impact. That impact can be net positive or it can be net negative, right? And so one of the things to appreciate is that, you know, when we’re in the work of doing business, when we’re operating in the context of things that impact people and society, we’re always causing an impact. And so the real question oftentimes is what’s the nature of the impact that we’re generating?

John Coleman: And Shundrawn, a question for you because you’ve worked in very diverse investment environments. We like to say all investing is impact investing. We totally agree with your thesis that every business, every investment makes an impact, whether positive or negative. How did you come to that belief in your journey within this broader asset management world? Is that something you kind of knew from the beginning? Did you have an evolution to come to that belief? Talk to us about your journey towards that.

Shundrawn Thomas: Yeah, so I think the journey is integrated, but it’s two parts, right? It’s how do I think about my role as a business leader being in the profession, which I have for most of my career of investing. So a business leader in the area of professional investing. Right. And one of the things I would say is it’s an evolution that’s occurred for me over time, John, and it’s how I think about approaching business and leading. I would say, broadly speaking, my philosophy has evolved to where I believe that if you are running an enterprise at its best, there is a triple bottom line that you want to deliver. First and foremost, you want to deliver profit. It’s very fine to say companies have a profit motive, so think of that as income. But second impact, when you think about the fact that when you’re running an enterprise, right. First of all, it’s made up of people. It’s not only the people in your organization, but it’s the partners, the vendors that you work with, the communities that you do business in. And now you have, by virtue of your vision and mission and opportunity to have a positive impact. And it happens by result of either your intentional action or inaction. Now, the third part of that, which it’s complementary, it’s not one the same is inclusion. And one of the things is we work in a multicultural society. We work with people who are created to be wonderfully different. And if we run our businesses in such a way that we value and we respect, we acknowledge and we integrate the value of those differences, we create greater value. And so what I would say is the wonderful thing is it allows us to not only become better at producing profit, it allows us to be better professionals at our craft, but ultimately better people. So I would say that philosophy of just generating in my mind that triple bottom line ultimately informed increasingly how I thought about investing and then ultimately a focus on impact investing.

John Coleman: Yeah, we see that a lot in our work. You know, even just the types of businesses, types of people, there is such a diversity of ways that people can have impact, can create flourishing environments that might look different for an investment manager and a fire truck company or something of that nature. I want to pivot to Copia, and I know Luke wants to jump in with that before we do. Just a quick note. You know, most people associate impact with ESG now. I think ESG become such an omnipresent term for values based investing, at least in the mainstream world. How do you think about the difference or similarities between impact investing and ESG?

Shundrawn Thomas: Right. So I’ll start with this context, John. As you know, I had the great privilege when I led our global asset management business at Northern Trust is really focusing on sustainable investing and socially responsible investing. And if you look, there’s a continuum now there related when you talk about sustainable investing or ESG, you talk about socially responsible investing, you talk about impact investing. But specifically, when you talk about ESG investing in impact, it is important to acknowledge that there are differences, right? Impact investing. As I alluded to earlier, it involves making investments with the specific intent of generating positive and measurable societal benefits alongside those financial returns. And while again, you hear it interchangeable with ESG, one of the reasons it’s notably different is just because the inception. So, like you would know this well, because I know you’re a student of this ESG at its core is really a framework. And actually, if you look at the history, it was really ushered in really in the public sector because they wanted to say, are we considering right the factors of environmental, social or governance concerns? And is that going into the investment decision making? But to be clear, at that inception, that framework was principally about impacting the investment strategy right at its inception, If you think about impact investing, the very intent of it was to integrate into an approach, something that was going to deliver a measurable outcome. So in its inception, impact investing is by definition affirmative. Whereas in many respects, first and foremost, ESG was a framework that was used for measurement and to think about how you incorporated into the risk management. And ultimately it became integrated into various investment strategies. So not bad or good, but those differences are relevant. The last difference I would note, which you would know well, is generally speaking, most of what we see in ESG strategies are applied in the public markets. And interestingly enough, you see more of a prevalence of impact investing in the private markets.

Luke Roush: I’d love to just unpack a bit more. One of the things we talk a lot about with our managers is focus and sort of know what you know and then kind of keep going deeper in spaces that you understand, where you understand kind of what the opportunities are, what the risks are. All that thinking about Copia group and just what you’ve defined is like, All right, this is what we really want to go deeper in love to have you comment on some of the impact metrics, both inputs as well as outputs that you guys are thinking about.

Shundrawn Thomas: I appreciate you asking that Luke. And we are certainly cut from a similar cloth. Like one of my basic rules for myself and personal investing is, look, I don’t invest in anything. I can’t, you know, understand at basic level. But what I would say is this there are a couple of elements to our value proposition are very simple. The first and foremost is we believe in focus. And so to your point on that, Luke, we’ve decided that we want to focus on the lower middle market. When we think about the lower middle market, we’re talking about established companies. Generally, the sweet spot is revenue base from 5 million to 100 million in revenue there. Variety of reasons why we like that. You probably well know that market is increasingly underserved. Banks have pulled away from providing capital there. Many private investors have moved to the higher end of the private markets. And what we find is these companies, we have a true partnering orientation and they very much look for the value add that we want to provide being more than just a financial sponsor. So that’s a part of the focus. The second we talk about is our focus on impact investing. But even there, we’ve decided to focus even more Luke, now. I’m a believer in both the ability to have a positive impact from an environmental and a social standpoint, but we decided we wanted to specifically focus on social impact. And as you well know, if you look at the breadth of impact investing strategies today, they are predominantly focused on the environmental side. So one with impact investing as we know it more formally. It’s one of the few places an investment. Management where the developed world outside of the U.S. is leading the U.S. in terms of dollars invested in focus and the like. And it’s been a prevalence on environmental. And I think, to be frank with you, Luke, I think people look at social sometimes as too hard to solve where it’s the opportunity and sometimes the biggest need. And then the last thing and this is a compliment. We do fundamentally believe in economic inclusion. So again, we think there’s a huge opportunity. If you think about, you know, a simple statistic, like if you look across, you know, private markets, for example, I believe that all told, the amount of capital that is allocated to women and ethnically diverse entrepreneurs falls somewhere below 4% in these cohorts, make up over 70% of the population. So that tells me from a very basic sense, there is a huge mismatch in terms of talent, in energy, in innovation relative to access to capital. So what we say is we want to unlock that so we don’t invest exclusively in firms that are led or owned by women in ethnically diverse people. But we do say we want to target 50% or more of our investments there, because, again, we think there’s a huge opportunity [….] and a huge need.

Luke Roush: And just maybe one follow up, As you first started to wade into that kind of core focus, what were the behaviors as a firm that you adopted and encouraged amongst your team to try to really enable that flow of opportunities coming across your desk? Like what did you do that really triggered that strategy?

Shundrawn Thomas: Yeah, well, Luke, I know you and John can appreciate this from the work that you all do. The first thing that we had to really instill in our culture, and I believe in this, we have to be truly intellectually curious, because what happens is there’s a predominant way in which people invest, Right? And what we’re looking to do is to be different and to be more innovative. Right? It’s no different than how we might think about our role as believers. It says where to be in the world, but not of the world. It talks about when we read scripture, You know, your ways are not my ways. And so literally, there’s a transformation of our thinking that happens when we become believers. And I’m not trying to overstate this, Luke. There has to be a transformation sometimes of your thinking when you’re trying to innovate or you’re trying to approach the marketplace in a new way. So that’s the first thing. The second thing that we drive in our culture is before we can try to compel anybody else of our vision or our value proposition, we first have to believe. And so what I tell people is we’re not just looking for intellectually bright people in our culture. We’re not just looking for people with deep expertise. We are fundamentally seeking to find people that believe in the vision and the mission and the value proposition that we think we’re uniquely called to. And that’s important because it’s a hallmark of the culture. The last thing that I would point out is the way that you reinforce those beliefs is how you organize around a value. And so everybody has maybe differing values, but we think it’s important in a firm to have certain shared values, and those build a load bearing walls. And I think if you look over time, if you really want to have a really, truly great enterprise, culture is only one of the only competitive advantages that you actually have. And so we focus a lot on that Luke.

John Coleman: Shundrawn, I want to dig into something. So you touched on a little bit. Knowing you, you’re a person of deep faith. I think you’re your family are people of faith, and you’re really well grounded in that. You’ve written Christian books. I believe you’re also one of the assistant pastors at your church. If if memory serves. Talk, if you don’t mind, about the way in which your faith has informed your approach to this theme of diversity in particular, and how Christians should think about this and why that’s important to Christians.

Shundrawn Thomas: Yeah. So I love I’m a lover of words. I’m a student of many things and I love the word of God. And, you know, it truly does give us so much practical wisdom that influences if we allow it, every aspect of our lives. But I think including in especially many times how we approach our work. Right. And so, you know, one of the most fundamental and basic things that we know as followers of Christ, he doesn’t make it very complicated. He says, Follow me. Yeah. And that means that there is a blueprint. There is an example that he put forward. And so I’m very much a student of, you know, the life and times of Jesus Christ, right, the way in which he led. And I think it would be impossible for anybody to objectively look at the leadership of example of Christ and say anything short of that. He for sure was the most inclusive leader that you would ever see. Think about how he approached those not only in his immediate circle that were different from different backgrounds, from different ethnic or racial or however we want to characterize it. Right. And what’s always amazed me, if you really just with open eyes, look at it. Not only was he inclusive, he extended himself. He encouraged his followers not to just go with the status quo, to always think about the least of those. Right. And he had this amazing quality to see the unique value in every person. He unlike us in our fallen state, we see differences as ways to divide. But he saw things that were different as attributable value that could be brought into the whole to make the whole greater. And so to me, it’s just literally following that example. And I can tell you unequivocally, John, you know, when I joined our leadership team at Northern Trust, it happened to be the case. When I joined, we had 16 executives on the asset management leadership team. I was the only person of color and we had no women. I’m using that as one example. There are lots of characteristics of diversity. When I left, the team that I left was two thirds women in ethnically diverse. I can tell you without a hesitation that that wonderfully talented and diverse team that I work with over time that we got there on purpose, not an accident made me a better professional and a better person. So it’s not just something intellectually I know in my head. I know through my experience what the value of that is. I can also tell you, John, we had incredible success in the business in terms of increasing our innovation, our product development, our revenue growth. And so it tells me more than just something that’s a nice to do, that’s a philosophical good that there is real value in it.

John Coleman: Yeah, I mean, that’s such a good word. Shundrawn. And it is, you know, we’re watching just like everyone else. I feel like the Chosen right now and it helps bring to light you know this you get to picture actually the way that Jesus behaved in the people. I mean, it really is. It’s amazing just how open and inclusive he was of the least of these of the outcasts of those who had been pushed to the margins and how much he was ready to challenge existing power structures and things like that. And he did you know, he saw that in a way, we are all created with dignity. And it’s also practically just really reassuring to me that that example, to your point, can help us unify, not divide that in this understanding that each person has immense worth and dignity in God, that we’re all created equal and that we have an equal worth to God. If you truly believe that it’s impossible to devalue someone or to not want to appreciate them for who they are and when done well, obviously it hasn’t been done well at all points in history for Christians. But when done well, that’s such a and the way that Jesus did it, that’s such a liberating message.

Shundrawn Thomas: It is

Luke Roush: And maybe we go over to just how you think, talk about one KPI in terms of percent or more of capital put to work. Maybe just talk a little bit more on kind of intermediate KPIs right there, sort of this ultimate where does capital go? Yeah, as you think about deal flows, you think about team composition as you think about hiring and being able to source an appropriate candidate pool that maybe looks and thinks differently right, than the existing team. How do you think about what are the, you know, your current team and what do you have them focused on in terms of performance indicators for 2023 as the example?

Shundrawn Thomas: Yeah. So let me split that in two categories. I’ll start with how do we think about it from the fund standpoint? So we have those five themes diversity, equity, inclusion, equal opportunities, health and wellness, workforce development and quality education. The way that we think about it is like if you look at something like workforce development. And so we’re very much focused on the ability of companies to not only create gainful opportunities for work, but investing in the growth and development of those professionals. And so whether we look at metrics like job creation and certain value added roles, we can look at actually in a company from the time we invest how people’s income grows or tracks over time, how we’re moving people into more sustainable jobs. So the same sustainability of their employee, all of these things we can see in terms of dollars spent, that’s a particular KPI in terms of direct to the investment of the development of employees and their skills. So just in the area of just workforce development, there’s this rich set of things that you can look at in terms of KPIs and you can measure them on an absolute basis for that particular enterprise. And you can also measure it across, say, similar enterprises. The thing that we do from this is very important. Luke, we seek to be practical. So we don’t expect that a single company touches every theme. We say, where is the place, given their unique mission or of calling? They are making a meaningful difference. And then what we do is, you know, some people are just I say we got lots of critics in the world. We’re not coming alongside as a critic. We’re saying it looks like you have a great opportunity here. It’s important to you. Let us help you do that even more. And that’s how we’re adding value now within the company. What we say is we have to hold ourselves to the same standards. And so in the same way that we’re going to be delivering impact investment reports as part of our report, we’ll talk about things that we’re doing at our company. So whether it’s everything from the diversity of our or to our leadership team, whether it’s the investment that we make in our employees. Like, if we’re going to expect this at companies we invest in, we have to hold ourselves accountable for it. And one of the basic ways you hold yourself accountable for Luke is you’re transparent. And so you let people know what you’re doing along those lines.

Luke Roush: That’s good. That’s good word. I think the transparency is a really that’s a word that’s come up like three times in the last week. And, you know, when you shine a light on things, you build trust and you build credibility and you just build. I think there’s a with whether it’s with your limited partners, whether it’s with portfolio companies, CEOs, whether it’s with teammates, creating more visibility helps to establish a foundation for trust. And so I think it’s an important point. Yeah.

John Coleman: Can I ask you, Shundrawn, on, you know, a key topic here, obviously is in certain types of impact investing. There’s a belief that it’s going to be concessionary or there’s a stated fact that it’s going to be concessionary. A lot of the impact you’re talking about is going to be delivering both financial return as well as social impact. How do you see the interplay of those two things and are they mutually reinforcing or are you approaching them as a tradeoff?.

Shundrawn Thomas: Yeah, so for us, so I want to be clear on this one. I think that we need a range of different types of impact investing. I think you can have impact investing that is done more specifically, I would say, in the philanthropic space or by social enterprises, and that takes on a certain character. I think there are organizations that I think are wonderful organizations like, you know, lists that works to get capital to underserved communities. And I would say some of what they do, by its very definition, is concessionary. And we absolutely have a need or a role for that, particularly when you have a partnership between public and private enterprise, in my opinion. And then there’s an example of the work that we do. Our premise is that you can also invest in a way that drives impact that is not concessionary. Now, when I say that is not to say that I think there’s anything wrong with concessionary investments, it’s just that I’m saying that’s not what we’re doing in this context. And I think you need that as well, because you’re going to have instances where people will say, Look, from the perspective of my fiduciary responsibility, I need to have as a basis that I am delivering investments that are going to have competitive market returns. And as a starting point, we won’t say that there’s anything inherently bad with that. Right. But I think there are folks like us, certainly. I think I look at the work that you all do, John, where we can say you can do that and still drive impact. You can do that and still have values based leadership. You can do that and still have impact for the kingdom. So the premise that these things are by definition antithetical, That is the premise. I think that we also have to be able to attack.

John Coleman: Shundrawn that is such a good articulation as we dive even deeper into this kind of measurement in the way that you look at impact, you look at financial return in that spectrum. One of the things I know that you all have done is partnered with Sustainalytics on ways objectively measure as you think about that partnership. Just help us understand that and how that reinforces the work that you’re doing.

Shundrawn Thomas: Yeah, I appreciate you asking that question. So Sustainalytics, which is now owned by Morningstar. So Morningstar Sustainalytics is a global leader in sustainable research, and so they work with many types of enterprises to focus on this area of measurement. So there were two important reasons there, others that we really wanted to partner with. Sustainalytics. First of all, when you’re trying to innovate, you want to work with people who can bring value, add and perspective that is complementary and different to yours, to the table to drive the best. So when we were working on this proprietary framework, we said, Listen, who could we partner with to really help drive innovation in this area? The second thing I think it ties to something that Luke and I were discussing earlier. I think there is value to having someone your partner with that brings an independent lens to what you’re doing. So there are three things that Sustainalytics does as it pertains to our framework. First of all, they provide a wholly independent assessment of our framework so that you actually as an investor can know that this is a genuine and a well inform impact investment framework. The second thing that they’ll be doing as part of the framework, John, is they’ll provide an independent assessment of each individual deal that we do. And the third thing that they will do is they will work with us on both the pulling together of the reporting of those KPIs or metrics they look was referring to, and then packaging that in the impact report. And so I think that creates not only a partner, but I think something that’s really important, a sense of accountability to what we’re doing and what we’re committed to.

Luke Roush: So that’s actually fascinating. I’ve got a whole bunch of other questions around Sustainalytics that we can maybe follow up on another time, because it sounds like a really powerful tool that is relevant in the midst of a fair amount of criticism sometimes around, you know, particularly public company funds that are being greenwash, so to speak, rather than real commitment to environmental stewardship. This idea of inviting other partners in to kind of help to create visibility and accountability. I think it makes a ton of sense. Thank you for your comments on that. One thing I want to talk about, just switching gears before we go to the Lightning Round is how your role as a pastor in your church is equipping you to take action on a different mission field, which is really more tied to your day to day work as an investor? Love to have you just talk about the Venn diagram between those two parts of how God equipped you.

Shundrawn Thomas: So, you know, it’s interesting, you know, over time, you know, as I grew in my level of responsibility in the workplace and I went into, you know, senior and then executive management. I mean, nobody gives you the memo beforehand about how much time that you will spend on the people side and how fast. So you need to be in that. Now, one of the things sometimes you don’t see it where sometimes God is preparing you in certain ways that you under appreciate. I’ve always served in the church, got involved as a teaching pastor, and then as ultimately associate pastor. And you deal with life on life issues with people. And the starting point to do anything that you do as a pastor has to be that you care intimately and deeply about the people. And that’s important because if we’re really honest in the workplace, that is not generally the starting point. The starting point is the self-interest of the organization or the profit motive and those things. And so I find that that experience as a pastor helps reorient me to what is the most important thing many times, which is the nature of that relationship. Because a lot of what you’re doing when you’re trying to do things in a professional setting is only going to come by the effort, the innovation, the hard work, the commitment, the belief of people. And so you have to appreciate then a big part of your job is actually to sow into the people. A big part of your job is to help them flourish. And so if your professional life is not different than your personal life, if you just have one life, if what you do whenever you interact with people is have a focus that says I actually want them to flourish, I think it’s incredible in terms of enhancing your effectiveness as a leader.

John Coleman: Amen. Fantastic. I mean, I can’t echo that enough Shundrawn. And that’s what we see in the best business leaders that we’re fortunate to partner with is just this real love of and belief in people. Right. Which I do think is founded in faith. Everybody’s created by the same creator. Everybody’s got talent. I’ve got a friend who says talent is universal, opportunity is not right. And in workplaces that create that I think are important. Now, I am an occasional writer. It would be absolute professional malpractice of me if I didn’t let you talk about a book. Shundrawn, I know you’ve written many books. I would love to hear about your journey as a writer, although I’m probably nerding out more over that than anything else. But your latest book, I believe, is Discover Joy in Work. Talk to us about Discover Joy in Work. How can we discover joy in work? And why is that topic important to you?

Shundrawn Thomas: So, you know, it frankly ties a lot to lose questions. So one is both about personal experience and it’s about my experience and leading people. So two things very quickly. One, I found that I, over time got to work with these incredibly talented people. And when you got to build real relationship with them, I was literally shocked at how many people were so deeply unhappy in their jobs. And I’m not exaggerating the fact that I’m [….] state truly the majority of people. The second thing that really put a light on this is for me personally, I went through a period where I was just struggling with a deep despondency from the outside looking in. It was at a period of time where I was seeing this incredible quote unquote success professionally. And so between being someone who had a sense, for lack of better terms, look at the past of people in the workplace. In dealing with my own experience, I really had to step back and think about, like the experience of work. And what I realized is, again, there is a joy I believe that God wants us to experience at work. I mean, if we have more time. I talk about the very opening passages of the Bible and we find a God not at rest, but at work. And if you were to describe his attitude towards his work, I would say, how could you describe in any way but joyful? And so how do we experience that same thing? I think it’s three things that are simple, not necessarily easy. All of them involve changing our perspective. The first is changing our perspective to the workplace. I think many of us have the wrong perspective about the workplace, and by that I mean the people that we work with in the environment we work in. The second thing is about work ethic, and that comes down to realizing that there external motivators that principally drive us from work. But if you’re external motivators, money, recognition and respect, I call it three R’s. It’s remuneration, you know, respect. In recognition. If your desire for those is greater than your internal motivation, you have imbalances, not the right work ethic. So you have to change your perspective on work ethic. The last thing is really important. We’ve kind of been talking around this. I call it work life. I say it simply this way, John, we focus so much on our careers, but the reality is your work life has to fit in the context of your overall life. There’s a purpose for which we are called. That’s bigger than any job, any role, any paycheck we have. And when we can see that we don’t have a occupation, we have a vocation, we have a life’s calling.

John Coleman: Well, I’ll give a brief testimony to discover Joy in Work, which everyone on this podcast should buy. I’m pretty sure we can’t pitch securities on this podcast, but I think we can pitch books. You know, I did my own transition a couple of years ago when I joined Sovereigns and was writing a book called The HPR Guide to Crafting Your Purpose. And that was part of me switching to the type of firm I was in. And I actually got to interview Shundrawn for that book, and that turned me on to his writing. And one of the books I read through my own transition was Discover Joy in work in the frameworks that you laid out I thought were so thoughtful about crafting a life that was really aligned with your work and about the way in which you could orient yourself towards work. And that was super informative for me as I began my journey at Sovereigns. Luke still thinks my work ethic is a little bit not what it should be, but it’s improved at the very least. And I thought the book was just fantastic. So I do hope people will pick it up. It’s an important topic. Luke Maybe I’ll pitch it over to you.

Luke Roush: Yeah, I’d love to. Transition is recognizing that we’re short on time. One of my favorite parts of this podcast is we affectionately call the Lightning Round. And so I’m going to lead off and then we kind of go back ping pong, back and forth. Some of the questions are serious, some of them are less so. But the idea is that we just get kind of 30-60 seconds responses. And so we’re grateful for you playing the game with us. I’m going to start off Chicago native Shundrawn and we’re very, very curious about which is better. The Italian B sandwich or deep dish pizza?

Shundrawn Thomas: Yeah, well, I love them both. I have to go deep dish pizza. I have to go with deep dish pizza.

Luke Roush: Yeah.

John Coleman: All right. Shundrawn I’m pivot here a little bit. Chicago is known for its great sports teams that are maybe have a spotty performance track record, let’s say, other than the Chicago Bulls of the Chicago sports teams right now between the Cubs, the White Sox, the Bulls, the Bears, who are you most optimistic about winning a title over the next couple of years?

Shundrawn Thomas: Oh, my gosh. This is a tough one because I am a die hard and miserable Chicago sports fan. I think all of our major teams are really bad straits right now. So let me just tell you where my heart is because I’m a Cubs fan. Even though I grew up on the South Side, I am a Blackhawks and a Bulls fan, I’m going to go Bears, not because I think we’re anywhere close to sniffing a Super Bowl. It’s just that I’m such a Bears fan and hope springs eternal.

John Coleman: I love the optimism.

Luke Roush: Lot of history, Buddy Rich history there, coming back to discovering joy at work. I think a lot of people here discovering joy at work and they think about an operating company, But you’re an investor, so how would you encourage investors to better discover joy in their work?

Shundrawn Thomas: I think that’s a great question because I think one of the basic things I would encourage investors, one of the things that we can do is we can get so focused on the intellectual asset of the discipline of investing. We are all head and no heart. So my basic encouragement to investors is bring your heart alongside your head. There is nothing that is going to depreciate your ability as a great investor. If you also look for the things that you are passionate about and are meaningful for you. And I think taken together that will bring a level of joy in your work that maybe some have an experience here heretofore, because we all need that connection between your head and heart.

John Coleman: Shundrawn I think your dad is a pastor and not just a pastor, but perhaps your pastor.

Shundrawn Thomas: Yes.

John Coleman: What is the best piece of pastoral advice you’ve gotten about your career?

Shundrawn Thomas: Oh my gosh. You know, my father and my mother who founded our church, they’ve given so much great advice over the years. But I would say the piece of advice he gave me that it’s been so beneficial to me at work and at home is that he says, Look, son, you know, wherever you are, be there. And if you don’t pay attention, the depth of that can just get by you. But I think that what happens for so many of us, we live so much of our lives distracted. And some of the most important moments that we have are the engagement that we have with people. And I’ll tell to myself, you can look back over time and you can say, you know, I was there, but I wasn’t really there. I wasn’t locked in. I wasn’t focused on that. And I missed that special moment. And so I always hear his voice echoing in my mind, and it gives me a different level of engagement and focus, particularly with people. Wherever you are, be there.

Luke Roush: So I want to actually go outside of your work and outside of the church, maybe just another ministry or nonprofit that you’re personally excited about. You find joy through your engagement with them.

Shundrawn Thomas: Yeah, so I appreciate that question. Now, we’re very involved with a number of different nonprofits, and my wife and I are very charitably inclined. I would say one that is top of mind that’s doing some interesting work, particularly it impacts communities here in Chicago, but I think it’s an example for the nation. So I joined the board of Rush University Medical Center, and the thing that pulled me over the top because we’re very intentional about where we spend our time, is they do this innovative and groundbreaking work on health equity. I mean, it is truly an example for these. I mean, they focus on communities in particular on the west side of the city. These happen to be communities that are predominantly African-American and Hispanic, but predominantly African-American. A lot of these communities, when you see what happened over time, you have a lot of industry moving out of the city and so forth and so on. But your reality is what was left is communities where they are, among other things, not only banking and financial deserts, but health deserts. So providing expert health care, creating access. But then the last thing is they went even further. They start thinking about ways to engage the economic vitality of these communities. So they said, as a hospital, we’re not only giving care to people, but we are a business. So we can do business with and engage people in the community is such an innovative way to think about health equity in the fact they’re doing it out in the community. And so we’ve come alongside that. We give a lot to those particular initiatives and we serve in that capacity.

John Coleman: That is awesome Shundrawn. So one thing we love to know end on for every episode, given it’s the Faith Driven Investor podcast, is for our guests to just teach us one thing that they’re learning through Scripture right now that’s impacting your life. I know this is important to you, but what would you share with our audience about what you’re learning from Scripture right now?

Shundrawn Thomas: So it is going to be very timely and topical because one of the privileges I have of serving in our church is I said as an associate pastor, I serve as teaching pastor, a teaching pastor. And so what I always say whenever I have the privilege to teach, to deliver the homily or the sermon, it’s always impart things that God is working with me on, revealing to me, and I feel like there’s an importation you have to share. And so one of the things I’ve been focused on most recently, and I’m actually teaching a series of the church on it’s a three part series is focusing on the practical wisdom and the power of the Word of God. I think it’s so easy in times like this, you know, people’s hearts in some ways are failing them. Their confidence in political and governmental and business systems is shaken. We look at all the things going on in the world. And so where do we go to answers. But we have this incredible source, the word of God. And what I encourage in this service, in this series is understanding one, The word of God is active, right? It is continually working. It’s effective. It does exactly what it is intended to do. It’s time tested, it’s enduring. Right. And so there’s a source of this deep practical wisdom that we have that we can trust. And I think for me, that is such an encouragement, like all the things that are going around, to just refocus on that truth. And so that’s what’s been top of mind for me.

John Coleman: Shundrawn awesome look. We are grateful for you taking the time on the Faith Driven Investor podcast. We’re grateful for the witness that you are in the financial services world and your faith and how that’s reflecting on others and also for the great work that you’re doing in the community right now. And, and I think Luke and I would both agree that we’ve loved the conversation and we’re very hopeful about the work that you’re set out to do now and really appreciative that you’re sharing your story with the world. Thanks so much for joining us.